Advertisement

Defining Quality in Surgery

  • Justin B. DimickEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

With growing recognition of wide variations in surgical performance, demand for information on surgical quality is at an all time high. However, there is very little agreement about how to best assess performance in surgery. According to the widely used Donabedian paradigm, quality can be measured using various aspects of structure, process, or outcome. Recently, there is growing enthusiasm for composite (or “global”) measures of quality. In this chapter, we discuss the pros and cons of each measurement approach and make recommendations for choosing among them.

Selected Readings

  1. 1.
    Osborne NH, Nicholas LH, Ghaferi AA, et al. Do popular media and internet-based hospital quality ratings identify hospitals with better cardiovascular surgery outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:87–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosenthal MB, Dudley RA. Pay-for-performance: will the latest payment trend improve care? JAMA. 2007;297:740–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Birkmeyer JD, Shahian DM, Dimick JB, et al. Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:777–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dimick JB, Osborne NH, Nicholas L, et al. Identifying high-quality bariatric surgery centers: hospital volume or risk-adjusted outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:702–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ. Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:626–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dimick JB, Staiger DO, Baser O, et al. Composite measures for predicting surgical mortality in the hospital. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28:1189–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hawn MT. Surgical care improvement: should performance measures have performance measures. JAMA. 2010;303:2527–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stulberg JJ, Delaney CP, Neuhauser DV, et al. Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections. JAMA. 2010;303:2479–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neuman HB, Michelassi F, Turner JW, et al. Surrounded by quality metrics: what do surgeons think of ACS-NSQIP? Surgery. 2009;145:27–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson WG. The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Surg. 2002;137:20–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dimick JB, Welch HG. The zero mortality paradox in surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:13–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dimick JB, Welch HG, Birkmeyer JD. Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size. JAMA. 2004;292:847–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iezzoni LI. The risks of risk adjustment. JAMA. 1997;278:1600–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Brien SM, DeLong ER, Dokholyan RS, et al. Exploring the behavior of hospital composite performance measures: an example from coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. 2007;116:2969–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Staiger DO. Operative mortality and procedure volume as predictors of subsequent hospital performance. Ann Surg. 2006;243:411–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1368–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dimick JB, Osborne NH, Hall BL, et al. Risk adjustment for comparing hospital quality with surgery: how many variables are needed? J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:503–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tu JV, Sykora K, Naylor CD. Assessing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: how many risk factors are enough? Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1317–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dimick JB, Staiger DO, Birkmeyer JD. Ranking hospitals on surgical mortality: the importance of reliability adjustment. Health Serv Res. 2010;45:1614–29.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Staiger DO, Dimick JB, Baser O, et al. Empirically derived composite measures of surgical performance. Med Care. 2009;47:226–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations