Current Perspectives in Nanotechnology Terminology and Nomenclature

Chapter
Part of the Nanostructure Science and Technology book series (NST)

Abstract

At the time of writing this chapter, early in 2010, several reports have been issued that differ in definitions used for nanotechnology, which is not unusual considering the large number of conferences, reports, papers and presentations given each year on this subject. It is in fact very difficult to follow developments in this field, and the multidisciplinary nature of nanotechnology almost invites a similar multiplicity of definitions as each specialty (or scientific discipline) adjusts to the new findings of what is a dynamic research effort. However, the same dynamism leads to ambiguity in meanings and to uncertainty in the overall impact this field will have when products are commercialized. In this chapter, we will be visiting the several dimensions, societal, governmental and technical, and thereby highlighting the challenges facing terminology and nomenclature efforts.

Keywords

TiO2 Titanium Porosity Toxicity SiO2 

References

  1. 1.
    House of Lords Science and Technology Committee: Nanotechnologies and Food, vol. I and II. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200910/ldselect/ldsctech/22/22i.pdf (2010). Accessed 16 Feb 2010
  2. 2.
    Kuhn, T.S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1970). EnlargedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Webster’s New International Dictionary, Unabridged. G. & C. Merriam Co., Springfield (1954)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Organization of Standardization: Nanotechnologies – Terminology and Definitions for Nano-Objects, ISO/TS 27687:2008(E). ISO, Geneva, Switzerland (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ASTM International: E 2456-06 Terminology for Nanotechnology. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Royal Society and The Royal Academy of Engineering: Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. The Royal Society, London. http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm (2004). Accessed 16 Feb 2010
  7. 7.
    EC Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) to the European Commission: Opinion on the scientific aspects of the existing and proposed definitions relating to products of nanoscience and nanotechnologies. http://www.ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_012.pdf (2007). Accessed 16 Feb 2010
  8. 8.
    EC Scientific Committee on Consumer Products to the European Commission: Opinion on safety of nanomaterials in consumer products. http://www.ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_o_123.pdf (2007). Accessed 16 Feb 2010
  9. 9.
    ETC Group: A tiny primer on nano-scale technologies and The Little Bang Theory. ETC Group. http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/55/01/tinyprimer_english.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2010
  10. 10.
    Hette, A.: Nanotechnology small matter, many unknowns. Swiss Reinsurance Company. http://www.swissre.com/pws/research%20publications/risk%20and%20expertise/risk%20perception/nanotechnology_small_matter_many_unknowns_pdf_page.html (2004). Accessed 16 Feb 2010
  11. 11.
    Soil Association: Nanotechnologies and food evidence to House of Lords Science and Technology Select Committee. http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/st136SoilAssociation.pdf (2009). Accessed 15 Feb 2010
  12. 12.
    Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs: UK voluntary reporting scheme for engineered nanoscale materials. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/nanotech/documents/vrs-nanoscale.pdf (2006). Accessed 16 Feb 2010
  13. 13.
    Breggin, L., Falkner, R., Jaspers, N., Pendergrass, J., Porter, R.: Securing the promise of nanotechnologies – towards transatlantic cooperation. Chatham House (The Royal Institute of International Affairs), London. http://www.elistore.org/reports_detail.asp?ID=11116 (2009). Accessed 16 Feb 2010
  14. 14.
    Miller, G., Senjen, R.: Out of the laboratory and on to our plates, 2nd edn. Friends of the Earth, Australia. http://www.foe.org/out-laboratory-and-our-plates (2008). Accessed 16 Feb 2010
  15. 15.
    Swiss Federal Office of Public Health and Swiss Federal Office for the Environment: Precautionary matrix for synthetic nanomaterials, version 1.0. http://www.bag.admin.ch/themen/chemikalien/00228/00510/05626/index.html?lang=en (2008). Accessed 16 Feb 2010
  16. 16.
    Auffan, M., Rose, J., Bottero, J.-Y., Lowry, G.V., Jolivet, J.-P., Wiesner, M.R.: Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 634–641 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Powell, J.J., Thoree, V., Pele, L.C.: Dietary microparticles and their impact on tolerance and immune responsiveness of the gastrointestinal tract. Br. J. Nutr. 98(Suppl. 1), S59–S63 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ostrowski, A.D., Martin, T., Conti, J., Hurt, I., Herr Harthorn, B.: Nanotoxicology: characterizing the scientific literature, 2000–2007. J. Nanopart. Res. 11, 251–257 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sanguansri, P., Augustin, M.A.: Nanoscale materials development – a food industry perspective. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 17, 547–556 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chemical Selection Working Group, U.S. Food & Drug Administration: Nanoscale materials [no specified CAS]; nomination and review of toxicological literature. http://www.ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/Chem_Background/ExSumPdf/Nanoscale_materials.pdf (2006). Accessed 16 Feb 2010
  21. 21.
    caNanoLab glossary. https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/ICR/caNanoLab. Accessed 20 Feb 2010
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    No. Cion 5431/08 DENLEG 6 CODEC 59: proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council on novel foods and amending regulation. http://www.register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/09/st10/st10754-ad01.en09.pdf. Accessed 17 Feb 2010
  24. 24.
    EPA Scientific Panel (Heringa et alia): Evaluation of the hazard and exosure associated with nanosilver and other nanometal pesticide products, SAP minutes no. 2010-01. http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/meetings/2009/november/110309ameetingminutes.pdf (2010). Accessed 16 Feb 2010
  25. 25.
    EFSA Scientific Panel (Barlow et alia): The potential risks arising from nanoscience and nanotechnologies on food and feed safety. EFSA J. 958, 1–39. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/doc/sc_op_ej958_nano_en,3.pdf (2009). Accessed 16 Feb 2010
  26. 26.
    TC 229 scope statement. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_technical_committee?commid=381983. Accessed 18 Feb 2010
  27. 27.
    TSCA inventory status of nanoscale substances – general approach (USEPA). http://www.epa.gov/oppt/nano/nmsp-inventorypaper.pdf. Accessed Mar 2010
  28. 28.
    Yang, D., Qi, L., Ma, J.: Eggshell membrane templating of hierarchically ordered macroporous networks composed of TiO2 tubes. Adv. Mater. 14, 1543–1546 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Long, J.C., Criscione, J.M.: Carbon survey. In: Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, vol. 4, p. 733. Wiley, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lagow, R.J.: Synthesis of linear acetylenic carbon: the ‘sp’ carbon allotrope. Science 267, 362–367 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    IUPAC: Compendium of Chemical Terminology (the “Gold Book”), 2nd edn, Compiled by McNaught, A.D., Wilkinson, A. Blackwell, Oxford. http://www.goldbook.iupac.org/ (1997). Accessed Mar 2010
  32. 32.
    IUPAC red book at IR-11.7 (“polymorphism”) and the “IUPAC compendium of chemical terminology”. http://www.iupac.org/publications/compendium/index.html (updated, online version of Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd edn. Blackwell, 1990)
  33. 33.
    IUPAC gold book, “diamond”Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rode, A., Gamaly, E.G., Christy, A.G., Fitz Gerald, J.G., Hyde, S.T., Elliman, R.G., Luther-Davies, B., Veinger, A.I., Androulakis, J., Giapintzakis, J.: Unconventional magnetism in all-carbon nanofoam. Phys. Rev. B 70, 054407 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shigley, J.: Diamond, natural. In: Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, vol. 8, p. 519. Wiley, Hoboken (2002)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wentorf Jr., H.: Diamond, synthetic. In: Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, vol. 8, p. 530. Wiley, Hoboken (1992)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    IUPAC gold book, “graphite,” “graphene layer,” and “rhombohedral graphite”Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    IUPAC red book 2004 at IR-3.5.3 (crystalline allotropic modifications of elements)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kalyoncu, R.S., Taylor Jr., H.A.: Natural graphite. In: Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, vol. 12, p. 771. Wiley, Hoboken (2002)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Horn, F.H.: Spiral growth on graphite. Nature 170, 581 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Taylor, R.: Fullerenes. In: Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, vol. 12, p. 228. Wiley, Hoboken (2002)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Leshchev, D.V., Kozyrev, S.V.: Grouping of carbon clusters and new structures. Fullerenes Nanotubes Carbon Nanostruct. 14, 533–536 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    IUPAC gold book, “amorphous carbon”Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    IUPAC red book 2004 at IR-3.4.1 (name of an element of infinite or indefinite molecular formula or structure)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Crane, E.J.: Chemical nomenclature in the United States. In: Chemical Nomenclature: A Collection of Papers Comprising the Symposium on Chemical Nomenclature Presented at the Diamond Jubilee of the American Chemical Society, September 1951, vol. 8, pp. 55–64. American Chemical Society, Washington (1953)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    ISO TC-229, JWG 1, PG 11: Nomenclature framework project for nano-objects (2009)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Section 3(2) (A) of the Act (15 U.S.C. §2602(2)(A))Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). http://www.iupac.org/. Accessed Mar 2010
  49. 49.
    Powell, W.H., Cozzi, F., Moss, G.P., Thilgen, C., Hwu, R.J.-R., Yerin, A.: Nomenclature for the C60-Ih and C70–D5h(6) fullerenes. Pure Appl. Chem. 74, 629–695 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cozzi, F., Powell, W.H., Thilgen, C.: Numbering of fullerenes (IUPAC recommendations 2005). Pure Appl. Chem. 77, 843–923 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chemical Abstracts Service: About CAS. http://www.cas.org/
  52. 52.
    Chemical Abstracts Service: CAS registry and CAS registry numbers. http://www.cas.org/
  53. 53.
    Introduction: Chemical Abstract Services Chemical Name Selection Manual, vol. I. American Chemical Society, Washington (1982)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Principles of general index nomenclature: CAS Name Selection Manual at A-005, vol. IGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    CAS Name Selection Manual at A-006, vol. IGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    CAS Name Selection Manual, vol. III at IN-1Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Nomenclature of inorganic chemistry, provisional recommendations 2004 at IR-1.3Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Preamble: A Guide to IUPAC Nomenclature of Organic Compounds (Recommendations). Blackwell (1993) (Blue Book)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    IUPAC red book 2004 at IR-1.4 (functions of chemical nomenclature)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    IUPAC Red Book 2004 at IR-1.5.2 (name construction)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Gentleman, D., Chan, W.: A systematic nomenclature for codifying engineered nanostructures. Small 5, 426–431 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Letter from Henry Lau to John Lewinson, Degussa Corporation, Dec 21, 1990 (IC-3070); Letter from Henry P. Lau, EPA, to Daniel C. Hakes, 3M (Nov 19, 1993) (IC-4482)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sellers, K.: Nanoscale materials: definition and properties. In: Sellers, K., Mackay, C., Bergeson, L.L., Clough, S.R., Hoyt, M., Chen, J., Henry, K., Hamblen, J. (eds.) Nanotechnology and the Environment. CRC, Boca Raton (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pennsylvania Bio Nano Systems, LLCDoylestownUSA

Personalised recommendations