The Legal Structure of Competition Policy in Turkey

Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to introduce readers to the basics of Turkish Antitrust Law and its enforcement practices. In this respect, the chapter is categorized into four parts. The first part covers the background and the sources of the Turkish Antitrust Law. After the legislative background is mentioned, the main legal sources of the law are specified. The second part is devoted to the main concepts prescribed in the Act such as the relevant market and the concept of undertaking. Substantive provisions are explained in the third part, and this part is organized under three headings. First, restrictive agreements are expounded along with the exemption rule. Subsequently, the monopoly provision is illustrated with some examples of abuse. And finally, the provision and the secondary legislation governing the concentrations are explained. Here, the procedural issues are of importance. Enforcement authorities and sanctions are discussed in the final part.

Keywords

Sugar Dioxide Shipping Marketing Turkey 

References

  1. Aksoy, N. (2004). Rekabetin Korunması Hakkında Kanun’a Aykırılığın Özel Hukuk Alanındaki Sonuçları. Ankara.Google Scholar
  2. Aslan, Y. (2007). Rekabet Hukuku. Bursa.Google Scholar
  3. Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs Competition Committee. (2010). Annual Report on Competition Policy Developments in Turkey.Google Scholar
  4. Erol, K. (2000). Rekabet Kurallarının Ülke Dışı Uygulanması. Rekabet Kurumu Yayını.Google Scholar
  5. Gürtler, O., Kräkel, M. (2009). HostileTakeover and Costly Merger Control.Google Scholar
  6. Gürzumar, O. B. (2002). 4054 Sayılı Rekabetin Korunması Hakkında Kanun’un 4. Maddesine Aykırı Sözleşmelerin Tabi Olduğu Geçersizlik Rejimi. Rekabet Dergisi, S.12, pp.  3–76.Google Scholar
  7. Gürzumar, O. B. (2005). Özel Hukuk Açısından 4054 Sayılı Kanun. 4054 Sayılı Rekabetin Korunması Hakkında Kanun ve Bu Kanun’da Değişiklik Yapılmasına İlişkin Taslak, Sempozyum, 7-8 Ekim 2005; Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayın No 426; Ankara, pp.  117–184.Google Scholar
  8. Güven, P. (2005). Rekabet Hukuku. Ankara.Google Scholar
  9. İnan, N. (2002). Rekabet Hukuku Uygulamasında Adliye Mahkemelerinin Rolü. Ankara Barosu Uluslar arası Hukuk Kurultayı, pp.  590–628.Google Scholar
  10. International Competition Network (ICN). (2009). Anti-Cartel Enforcement Template. Subgroup 2: Enforcement Techniques: Turkey.Google Scholar
  11. Jones, A., Sufrin, B. (2004). EC Competition Law: Text, Cases and Materials, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Monti, M. (2003). The Relationship Between CAP and Competition Policy. Does EU Competition Law Apply to Agriculture? COGECA Conference Helsinki Fair Trade.Google Scholar
  13. OECD. (2002). Competition Law and Policy in Turkey.Google Scholar
  14. OECD. (2005). Competition Law and Policy in Turkey.Google Scholar
  15. Özdemir, O. S. (2002). Sınai Haklara İlişkin Lisans Sözleşmeleri ve Rekabet Hukuku Düzenlemelerinin Lisans Sözleşmelerine Uygulanması. Istanbul.Google Scholar
  16. Sanlı, K. C. (2000). Rekabetin Korunması Hakkındaki Kanun’da Öngörülen Yasaklayıcı Hükümler ve Bu Hükümlere Aykırı Sözleşme ve Teşebbüs Birliği Kararlarının Geçersizliği.Google Scholar
  17. Sanlı, K. C. (2000b). Relabet Hukukunda Tekelci Fiyatlandırma, Perşembe Konferansları, S.10, Rekabet Kurumu Yayını Ankara, pp.  75–165.Google Scholar
  18. Sanlı, K. C. (2003). Rekabet Hukukunda Haksız Fiil Sorumluluğu. Rekabet Hukukunda Güncel Gelişmeler Sempozyumu I. Konferans Kitabı (editör Ayşe Odman Boztosun), Rekabet Kurumu Yayını, Ankara, pp.  211–277.Google Scholar
  19. Sanlı, K. C. (2007). Rekabetin Koruması Hakkında Kanun Tasarısı Taslağı’nın Özel Hukuk Hükümlerinin Değerlendirilmesi, pp.  30–72.Google Scholar
  20. Topçuoğlu, M. (2001). Rekabeti Kısıtlayan Teşebbüsler Arası İşbirliği Davranışları ve Hukuki Sonuçları. Ankara.Google Scholar
  21. Yolcu, İ. (2003). Assessment of the Investigation Procedures in the Act No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition and the Procedural Problems Arising from their Implementation in Comparison with the EC Law.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer New York 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Actecon Economic ConsultancyIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.The School of LawBilgi UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.The School of LawBilkent UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.Assistant Professor and Director of the Competition Law and Policy Research Center at IstanbulBilgi University Faculty of Law and Adjunct Professor at Bilkent University LL.M. ProgramIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations