Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How to Study Group Cognition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Analyzing Interactions in CSCL

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series ((CULS,volume 12))

Abstract

Understanding how a collaborative group as a whole constructs ­knowledge through joint activity in a CSCL setting is what sets the research field of CSCL apart from other approaches to the study of learning. Successful collaboration involves not only the incorporation of contributions of individuals into the group discourse, but also the effort to make sure that participating individuals understand what is taking place at the group level. The contributions of individuals to the group and of understandings from the group to the individuals cannot be studied by analyses at the individual unit of analysis, but only by studying the interactions at the group level. The group knowledge construction process synthesizes innumerable resources from language, culture, the group’s own history, individual backgrounds, relevant contexts and the sequential unfolding of the group discourse in which the individuals participate. Although the group process is dependent upon contributions and understanding of individuals, their individual cognition is essentially situated in the group process. Group cognition is the science of cognitive processes at the group unit of analysis. These group processes—such as the sequential flow of proposals, questioning, building common ground, maintaining a joint problem space, establishing intersubjective meanings, positioning actors in evolving roles, building knowledge collaboratively and solving problems together—are not analyzable as individual behaviors. This chapter will describe how the Virtual Math Teams project was designed as a prototypical CSCL environment in which the relevant resources and interactions could be recorded for the micro-analytic study of group cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2008). The bounds of cognition. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cakır, M. P., Zemel, A., & Stahl, G. (2009). The joint organization of interaction within a multimodal CSCL medium. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 115–149. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9061-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çakir, M. P., Zemel, A., & Stahl, G. (2009). The joint organization of interaction within a multimodal CSCL medium. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 4(2), 115–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, E. S., & Shumar, W. (2009). Student and team agency in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 207–224). New York: Springer. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0228-3_11.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G., Lotan, R. A., Abram, P. L., Scarloss, B. A., & Schultz, S. E. (2002). Can groups learn? Teachers College Record, 104(6), 1045–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Y., Kumar, R., Chaudhuri, S., Gweon, G., & Rosé, C. P. (2009). Helping agents in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 335–354). New York: Springer. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0228-3_19.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Kosultit Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., & Toiviainen, H. (2009). Co-configurational design of learning instrumentalities: An activity-theoretical perspective. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning in social practices. ICT and new artifacts: Transformation of social and cultural practices. Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkens, G., & Janssen, J. (2008). Automatic coding of dialogue acts in collaboration protocols. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(4), 447–470. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9052-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1960/1988). Truth and method. New York: Crossroads.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). Elements of the theory of structuration. In The constitution of society (pp. 1–40). New York: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, W. (1992). The indexical ground of deictic reference. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 43–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Moghaddam, F. (2003). Introduction: The self and others in traditional psychology and in positioning theory. In R. Harré & F. Moghaddam (Eds.), The self and others (pp. 1–11). Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1927/1996). Being and time: A translation of Sein und Zeit (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. Available at http://lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/students/c-merkel/document4.HTM.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 1–23). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron, C., & Streeck, J. (2000). Gesture, knowledge and the world. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 118–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, E. (1995). An anthropology of reading. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3–11. Available at http://www.aera.net/pubs/er/pdf/vol33_02/2026-02_pp03-11.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medina, R., Suthers, D. D., & Vatrapu, R. (2009). Representational practices in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 185–205). New York: Springer. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0228-3_10.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., & Wegerif, R. (1999). Is “Exploratory talk” Productive talk? In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analyzing productive interaction (pp. 79–101). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mühlpfordt, M., & Stahl, G. (2007). The integration of synchronous communication across dual interaction spaces. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), The proceedings of CSCL 2007: Of mice, minds, and society (CSCL 2007). New Brunswick, NJ. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/vmtwiki/martin.pdf.

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibrium of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A. B., & Lai, F. F. (2009). Inscriptions, mathematical ideas and reasoning in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 237–259). New York: Springer. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0228-3_13.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, P., & Aydede, M. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosé, C., Wang, Y.-C., Cui, Y., Arguello, J., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., et al. (2008). Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(3), 237–271. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9034-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. Available at www.jstor.org.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmiento, J. (2007). Bridging: Interactional mechanisms used by online groups to sustain knowledge building over time. Paper presented at the international conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL ‘07), New Brunswick, NJ., Available at http://GerryStahl.net/vmtwiki/johann.pdf.

  • Sarmiento, J., & Stahl, G. (2008). Extending the joint problem space: Time and sequence as essential features of knowledge building. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2008), Utrecht, Netherlands. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/pub/icls2008johann.pdf.

  • Sarmiento-Klapper, J. W. (2009). Bridging mechanisms in team-based online problem solving: Continuity in building collaborative knowledge. Unpublished Dissertation, Ph.D., College of Information Science and Technology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. (1995). The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(3), 321–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses and mathematizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2002). Groupware goes to school. In J. H. J. Pino (Ed.), Groupware: Design, implementation and use: Proceedings of the 8th international workshop on groupware (CRIWG ‘02) (Vol. 2440, pp. 7–24) La Serena, Chile. Springer. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/cscl/papers/ch11.pdf.

  • Stahl, G. (2004a). Can community knowledge exceed its members’? ACM SigGroup Bulletin, 23(3), 1–13. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/publications/conferences/2003/group/workshop.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2004b). Mediation of group cognition. SigGroup Bulletin, 24(4), 13–17. Available athttp://GerryStahl.net/publications/journals/Mediation%20of%20Group%20Cognition.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition: The collaborative locus of agency in CSCL. Paper presented at the international conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL ‘05), Taipei, Taiwan (pp. 632–640). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/pub/cscl2005.pdf & http://GerryStahl.net/pub/cscl2005ppt.pdf.

  • Stahl, G. (2006a). Analyzing and designing the group cognitive experience. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems (IJCIS), 15, 157–178. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/pub/ijcis.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2006b). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/mit/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2006c). Supporting group cognition in an online math community: A cognitive tool for small-group referencing in text chat. Journal of Educational Computing Research (JECR) special issue on Cognitive tools for collaborative communities, 35(2), 103–122. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/pub/jecr.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2006d). Sustaining group cognition in a math chat environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning (RPTEL), 1(2), 85–113. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/pub/rptel.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2007). Meaning making in CSCL: Conditions and preconditions for cognitive processes by groups. Paper presented at the international conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL ‘07), New Brunswick, NJ: ISLS, Available at http://GerryStahl.net/pub/cscl07.pdf.

  • Stahl, G. (2008a). Book review: Exploring thinking as communicating in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(3), 361–368. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9046-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2008b). Human-human interaction and group learning. Paper presented at the Human-Computer Interaction Consortium, Frasier, CO, Available at http://GerryStahl.net/pub/hcic2008.pdf.

  • Stahl, G. (2009a). From individual representations to group cognition. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 57–73). New York: Springer. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0228-3_5.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2009b). Studying virtual math teams. New York: Springer. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/vmt/book.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G., & Herrmann, T. (1999). Intertwining perspectives and negotiation. Paper presented at the ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (Group ‘99), Phoenix, AZ (pp. 316–324). Available at http://GerryStahl.net/cscl/papers/ch07.pdf.

  • Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. J. (2004). The effect of functional roles on perceived group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 195–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos, J. W., & Stahl, G. (2007). Methodological issues in developing a multi-dimensional coding procedure for small group chat communication. Learning & Instruction. Special issue on measurement challenges in collaborative learning research, 17(4), 394–404. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/vmtwiki/jw.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasley, S. D., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229–258). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trausan-Matu, S., & Rebedea, T. (2009). Polyphonic inter-animation of voices in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 451–473). New York: Springer. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0228-3_24.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1930/1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wee, J. D., & Looi, C.-K. (2009). A model for analyzing math knowledge building in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 475–497). New York: Springer. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0228-3_25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, N. (2009). Question co-construction in VMT chats. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp. 141–159). New York: Springer. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0228-3_8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, N., Zemel, A., & Stahl, G. (2008). Questioning and responding in online small groups engaged in collaborative math problem solving. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2008), Utrecht, Netherlands. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/pub/icls2008nan.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Information Science and Technology, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut St, Philadelphia, USA

    Gerry Stahl

Authors
  1. Gerry Stahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerry Stahl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, W. Johnson Street 1025, Madison, 53706-1796, Wisconsin, USA

    Sadhana Puntambekar

  2. Dept. Educational Sciences, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht, 3584 CS, Netherlands

    Gijsbert Erkens

  3. Graduate School of Education, Rutgers University, Seminary Place 10, New Brunswick, 08901, New Jersey, USA

    Cindy Hmelo-Silver

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stahl, G. (2011). How to Study Group Cognition. In: Puntambekar, S., Erkens, G., Hmelo-Silver, C. (eds) Analyzing Interactions in CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7710-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation