Skip to main content

Reporting and Modeling of Results Below the Limit of Detection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Total Diet Studies

Abstract

Conducting dietary exposure assessment (E) consists in combining deterministically or probabilistically food consumption figures (Q) with concentrations (C) of a given chemical substance in a number of foods or food categories. Occurrence data can be obtained either from control and monitoring programs or from a total diet Study (TDS). In both cases, data reported to be below the limit of detection (LOD), called “non-detects” or “left-censored data”, are likely to have a critical influence on the results of the assessment. Both the LOD and the limit of quantification (LOQ) are of special importance for exposure estimations in risk assessments as they determine the minimum value that can be detected and quantified, respectively.

The objective of TDS is to provide concentration data for dietary exposure assessment, which are analyzed in food as consumed and issued from composite samples expected to represent an average value for a food, food group of interest or even the whole diet. In theory, the dietary exposure to a chemical could, therefore, be based on a unique sample including a weighted mix of all food of the diet in which the chemical is expected to occur. At the other end of the spectrum of possibilities, a TDS can be based on each relevant food item, such as fish, or on a composite of various species available on the market. Finally composite samples can be prepared locally and repeated in various areas of a country or region and in various seasons to capture the variability of the contamination regarding these parameters.

This chapter covers the handling of non-detects in TDS studies. It is based on a review of the literature included in a recent report of the European Food Safety Authority dedicated to this topic. While none of these works were specific to the TDS, many were based on realistic datasets in the field of chemical occurrence in food.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Keith LH, Crummett W, Deegan J Jr, Libby RA, Taylor JK, Wentler G (1983) Principles of environmental analysis. Anal Chem 55(14):2210–2218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pennington JAT (1998) Dietary exposure models for nitrates and nitrites. Food Control 9(6):385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. EFSA. Management of left-censored data in dietary exposure assessment of chemical substances, European Food Safety Authority 2010. Access 17 March 2010. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/scdoc/1557.htm

  4. WHO-GEMS/Food-EURO. Reliable evaluation of low-level contamination of food. Report on a workshop in the frame of GEMS/Food-EURO, 26–27 May 1995, Kulmbach. Access 28 May 1995, updated January 2013. http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/chem/en/lowlevel_may1995.pdf

  5. El-Shaarawi AH, Esterby SR (1992) Replacement of censored observations by a constant: an evaluation. Water Res 26:835–844

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Helsel DR (2005) Nondetects and data analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. IPCS/WHO (2008) Uncertainty and data quality in exposure assessments, International Programme on Chemical Safety/World Health Organization: Geneva. http://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/methods/harmonization/exposure_assessment.pdf

  8. Hewett P, Ganser GH (2007) A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data. Ann Occup Hyg 51(7):611–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tressou J, Leblanc JC, Feinberg M, Bertail P (2004) Statistical methodology to evaluate food exposure to a contaminant and influence of sanitary limits: application to Ochratoxin A. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 40(3):252–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Antweiler RC and Taylor HE, 2008. Evaluation of statistical treatments of left-censored environmental data using coincident uncensored data sets: I. Summary statistics. Environmental science and technology, 42, 3732–3738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Paulo MJ, Van der Voet H, Jansen MJW, Ter Braak CJF, Van Klaveren JD (2005) Risk assessment of dietary exposure to pesticides using a Bayesian method. Pest Manag Sci 61:759–766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vlachonikolis IG, Marriott FHC (1995) Evaluation of censored contamination data. J Food Addit Contam 12:637–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hecht H, Honikel KO (1995) Assessment of data sets containing considerable values below the detection limits. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 201(6):592–597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brittan Y, Vlachonikolis IG (198) The impact of residual disability from illness and injury on the distribution of household income: a log normal approach, Working Paper No. 9. Centre for Socio-legal Studies

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aitchison J, Brown JAC (1969) The log normal distribution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Aerts Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aerts, M., Bakker, M.I., Ferrari, P., Fuerst, P., Tressou, J., Verger, P.JP. (2013). Reporting and Modeling of Results Below the Limit of Detection. In: Moy, G., Vannoort, R. (eds) Total Diet Studies. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7689-5_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics