Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

TANF and EITC: A Literature Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
U.S. Social Welfare Reform

Part of the book series: International Series on Consumer Science ((ISCS))

Abstract

This chapter examines Aid to Families with Dependent Children/Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (AFDC/TANF) and Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) participation as AFDC transitioned into TANF over the study period. Figure 5.1 highlights the general trends in AFDC/TANF participation from the Reagan through G. W. Bush administrations and EITC participation, due to availability of data, from 1990 through the G. W. Bush administration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acs, G., & Loprest, P. (2007). Final Report: TANF caseload composition and leavers synthesis report. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411553_tanf_caseload.pdf.

  • Alfred, M. V. (2005). Does Wisconsin Works work? Perspectives of participating women and their employees. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 26(3), 345–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • As Economy Slides: More People Seek Assistance. (2008, December 17). The Washington Post, A10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bane, M. J. (1995). Reviewing the waiver process. Public Welfare, 53(1), 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. M. (2001). Declining caseloads/increased work: What can we conclude about the effects of welfare reform? Economic policy review – Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 7(2), 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. M., & Schmidt, L. (2001). Work, wages, and welfare. In R. M. Blank & R. Haskins (Eds.), The new world of welfare (pp. 70–102). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, D., Kemple, J. J., Morris, P., Scrivener, S., Verma, N., & Hendra, R. (2000). The family transition program: Final report on Florida’s initial time-limited welfare program. Washington, DC: MDRC. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.mdrc.org/publications/20/full.pdf.

  • Blumenthal, M., Erard, B., & Ho, C.-C. (2005). Participation and compliance with the earned income tax credit. National Tax Journal, 58(2), 189–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehnen, E., & Corbett, T. (1996). Welfare waivers: Some salient trends. Focus, 81(2), 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, M., & Simmons, L. (2002). Post-welfare reform, low-income families and the dissolution of the safety net. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23(3), 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, R. K. (2006). The earned income tax credit: A study of eligible participants and non-participants. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 33, 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, R. K. (2009). EITC & TANF participation among young adult low-income families. Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, 4(1), 136–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caputo, R. K. (2010). Prevalence and patterns of earned income tax credit use among EITC-eligible tax filing families: A panel study, 1995–2005. Families in Society, 1(1), 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code of Federal Regulations. (2008). Subpart D – How will we determine caseload reduction credit for minimum participation rates? 45 CFR Ch. 2 (October 1, 2008 edition), §261.40–§261.55. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_08/45cfr261_08.html.

  • Coffield, C. D. (2002). Welfare reform in Indiana: The political economy of restricting access to education and training. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23(3), 261–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, T. (1996). Understanding Wisconsin Works (W-2). Focus, 81(3), 53–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Economic Advisors. (1997). Technical report: Explaining the decline in welfare receipt, 1993–1996. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/EOP/CEA/Welfare/Technical_Report.html.

  • Council of Economic Advisors. (1999). Technical report: The effects of welfare policy and the economic expansion on welfare caseloads: An update. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/EOP/CEA/html/welfare/techv2.html.

  • Curtis, K. A. (2002). Financial penalties under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program: Policy discourse and strategies for reform. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23(3), 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, M., DeLeire, T., & Schwabish, J. (2009). Stepping stone or dead end? The effect of EITC on earnings growth. (Discussion Paper No. 1365-09.) Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson, C., & Klerman, J. A. (2008). Did welfare reform cause the caseload decline? Social Service Review, 82(4), 703–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D., & Smith, J. C. (2008). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2007. Current Population Reports, P60-235. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/p60-235.pdf.

  • DeParle, J. (2004). American dream: Three women, ten kids, and a nation’s drive to end welfare. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devere, C. (2001). Welfare reform research: What do we know about those who leave welfare? RL30882. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://digital.library.unt.edu/govdocs/crs/permalink/meta-crs-2069:1.

  • Devere, C., Falk, G., & Burk, V. (2000). Welfare reform research: What have we learned since the family support act of 1988? RL30724. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, T. (2005). Distinguishing between short-term and long-term recipients of the earned income tax credit. National Tax Journal, 58(4), 807–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eissa, N., & Liebman, J. B. (1996). Labor supply response to the earned income tax credit. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(2), 605–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, G., Gish, M., & Solomon-Fears, C. (2005). Welfare reauthorization: An overview of the issues. Updated December 21, 2005. Congressional Research Report for Congress. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://digital.library.unt.edu/govdocs/crs/permalink/meta-crs-8016:1.

  • Folk, K. F. (1996). Welfare reform under construction: Wisconsin Works (W-2). Focus, 81(3), 55–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, S., & Friedlander, D. (1995). The JOBS evaluation: Early findings on program impacts in three states. Executive summary. New York/Oakland, CA: MDRC. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.mdrc.org/publications/214/execsum.html.

  • Freedman S., Friedlander, D., Hamilton, G., Rock, J., Mitchell, M., Nudelman, J., et al. (2000). National evaluation of welfare-to-work strategies. Evaluating alternative welfare-to-work approaches: Two-year impacts for eleven programs. New York/Oakland, CA: MDRC. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.mdrc.org/publications/33/full.pdf.

  • Freedman, S., Friedlander, D., Lin, W., & Schweder, A. (1996). The GAIN evaluation: Five-year impacts on employment, earnings, and AFDC receipt (Working Paper 96.1). New York/Oakland, CA: MDRC. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.mdrc.org/publications/403/full.pdf.

  • Friedlander, D. (1988). Subgroup impacts and performance indicators for selected welfare employment programs. New York/Oakland, CA: MDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gais, T., & Nathan, R. (2001). Status report on the occasion of the 5th anniversary of the 1996 personal responsibility welfare-reform act. Albany, NY: The Rockefeller Institute of Government. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.rockinst.org/pdf/workforce_welfare_and_social_services/2001-08-17-status_report_on_the_occasion_of_the_5th_anniversary_of_the_1996_personal_responsibility_welfare-reform_act.pdf.

  • Gais, T. L., Nathan, R. P., Lurie, I., & Kaplan, T. (2001). Implementation of the personal responsibility act of 1996. In R. Blank & R. Haskins (Eds.), The new world of welfare (pp. 35–69). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N., & Gilbert, B. (1989). The enabling state: Modern welfare capitalism in America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, R. (2005). The earned income tax credit: Boosting employment, aiding the working poor. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.stateeitc.com/research/CBPP_EITC_071905_Report.pdf.

  • Grogger, J. (2003). The effects of time limits, the EITC, and other policy changes on welfare use, work, and income among female-headed families. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2), 394–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, J. L., & Lurie, I. (1992). How 10 states implemented JOBS. Public Welfare, 50(3), 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, J. L., & Lurie, I. (1994). Implementing JOBS: Progress and promise. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halter, A. P. (1994). The family support act: Reinventing the wheel? Families in Society, 39(5), 526–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, G., & Friedlander, D. (1989). Final report on the saturation work initiative model in San Diego. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskins, R. (2001). Effects of welfare reform on family income and poverty. In R. M. Blank & R. Haskins (Eds.), The new world of welfare (pp. 103–136). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskins, R. (2006). Work over welfare: The inside story of the 1996 welfare reform law. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotz, V. J., Mullin, C. H., & Scholz, J. K. (2006). Examining the effect of the earned income tax credit on the labor market participation of families on welfare (NBER Working Paper 11968). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karier, T. (1996). Job opportunities and basic skills: Perspectives from eight states. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy, Evergreen State College. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/rptfiles/JOBS.pdf.

  • Kasten, R. W. (1992). Wisconsin’s “Learnfare” and federal waivers: Do the waivers help or hinder? Public Welfare, 50(2), 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loprest, P. (1999). Families who left welfare: Who are they and how are they doing? Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Accessed March 14, 2009, from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/discussion99-02.pdf.

  • Lurie, I. (2006). At the front lines of the welfare system: A perspective on the decline in welfare caseloads. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maag, E. (2004, August 2). Tax preparation for low-income households, knowledge of the EITC. Tax Notes. Washington, DC: Tax Policy Center. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedPDF/1000676_TaxFacts_080204.pdf.

  • Maag, E. (2005, March 14). Disparities in knowledge of the EITC. Tax Notes. Washington, DC: Tax Policy Center. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/url.cfm?ID=1000752.

  • Mammen, S., & Lawrence, F. C. (2006). Use of the earned income tax credit by rural working families. Paper presented at the Eastern Family Economics and Resource Management Association 2006 Conference, February 23–25, 2006, Knoxville, TN. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://mrupured.myweb.uga.edu/conf/4.pdf.

  • Mead, L. M. (2001). The politics of conservative welfare reform. In R. M. Blank & R. Haskins (Eds.), The new world of welfare (pp. 201–220). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. D. (2007). The U.S. earned income tax credit, its effects, and possible reforms (Harris School Working Paper Series 07.20). Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://harrisschool.uchicago.edu/about/publications/working-papers/pdf/wp_07_20.pdf.

  • Meyer, B. D., & Rosenbaum, D. T. (2000). Making single mothers work: Recent tax and welfare policy and its effects. National Tax Journal, 53(4), 1027–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. D., & Rosenbaum, D. T. (2001). Welfare, the earned income tax credit, and the labor supply of single mothers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3), 1063–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D. P. (1992). Welfare is back in the news: What has changed since passage of the family support act? Public Welfare, 50(2), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, R. P., & Gais, T. L. (1999). Implementing the Personal Responsibility Act of 1996: A first look. Albany: The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, State University of New York. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.rockinst.org/pdf/federalism/1999-01-implementing_the_personal_responsibility_act_of_1996_a_first_look.pdf.

  • Offner, P. (1992). JOBS: How are we doing? Where are we going? Public Welfare, 50(3), 8. 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, H. (2008, January 21). Statement by Secretary Paulson on EITC awareness day. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/hp791.htm.

  • Paz-Fuchs, A. (2008). Welfare-to-work. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, K. R. (2001). Who knows about the earned income tax credit? Assessing the New Federalism (Policy Brief No. B-27). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/anf_b27.pdf.

  • Rector, R. (1993). Welfare reform, dependency reduction, and labor market entry. Journal of Labor Research, 14(3), 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers-Dillon, R. H. (2004). The welfare experiments: Politics and policy evaluation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, J. K. (1990). The participation rate of the earned income tax credit. Institute for Research on Poverty (Discussion Paper 928-90). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, J. K. (1994). The earned income tax credit: Participation, compliance, and antipoverty effectiveness. National Tax Journal, 47(1), 63–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Policy Development Project. (1999). Formal cash diversion programs: Treatment of payments. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.spdp.org/tanf/divover/divpymt.pdf.

  • Strawn, J. (1998). Beyond job search or basic education: Rethinking the role of skills in welfare reform. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.clasp.org/publications/beyond_job_search.pdf.

  • Strawn, J., Greenberg, M., & Savner, S. (2001). Improving employment outcomes under TANF. In R. M. Blank & R. Haskins (Eds.), The new world of welfare (pp. 223–244). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawn, J., & Martinson, K. (2000). Steady work and better jobs: How to help low-income parents sustain employment and advance in the workforce. New York: MDRC. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.mdrc.org/publications/17/full.pdf.

  • Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program (2006). Seventh annual report to congress. Appendix. Table 10.8. Temporary Assistance for Needy Famililies – Active Cases Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Ethnicity/Race FY 2003. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/data-reports/annualreport7/Appendix/TANF_7th_Report_Appendix.pdf.

  • Turner, J. A., & Main, T. (2001). Work experience under welfare reform. In R. M. Blank & R. Haskins (Eds.), The new world of welfare (pp. 291–310). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udesky, L. (1990, September 24). How workfare hurts kids: Welfare reform and its victims. The Nation, 251(9), 302–304, 306.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2009a). Table 10 Related children in female householder families as a proportion of all related children, by poverty status: 1959 to 2008. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/histpov/hstpov10.xls.

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2009b). Table 11 Related children as a proportion of the poverty population, by race and Hispanic origin: 1959 to 2008. Accessed January 26, 2010, from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/histpov/hstpov11.xls.

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2009c). Table 18 Workers as a proportion of all poor people: 1978 to 2008. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/histpov/hstpov18.xls.

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2009d). Table 22 Number and percent of people below 50 percent of poverty level: 1975 to 2008. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/histpov/hstpov22.xls.

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (1996a). Characteristics and financial circumstances of AFDC recipients FY 1996. Table 23. Percent distribution of AFDC female adult recipients by employment status October 1995-September 1996. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/character/FY96/AX23.PDF.

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (1996b). Characteristics and financial circumstances of AFDC recipients FY 1996. Table 26. Percent distribution of AFDC male adult recipients by employment status October 1995-September 1996. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/character/FY96/AX26.PDF.

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (1999, April 12). Temporary assistance for needy families (TANF) program; Final rule. Part II. Federal Register, 64(69), 12270–17768. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/law-reg/finalrule/regla1.pdf.

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (2002). Temporary assistance for needy families (TANF) program: fourth annual report to congress. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/data-reports/ar2001/chapter02.pdf.

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (2006). Temporary assistance for needy families (TANF) program: seventh annual report to congress. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/data-reports/annualreport7/TANF_7th_Report_Final_101006.pdf.

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (2007). TANF financial data. Overview of federal funds available and spent in FY 2006 by grant year. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofs/data/2006/overview.html.

  • U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.). Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servletSurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&seriesid=LNU0400&yearsoption=all_years&periods_option=specific_periods&periods=Annual+Data.

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. (1997). Earned income tax credit: Claimants’ credit participation and income patterns, tax years 1990 through 1994. Washington, DC: Author. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.gao.gov/archive/1997/gg97069.pdf.

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. (2001). Earned income tax credit eligibility and participation. Washington, DC: Author. Accessed April 26, 2010, from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02290r.pdf.

  • Ziliak, J. P., Figlio, D. N., Davis, E. E., & Connolly, L. S. (2000). Accounting for the decline in AFDC caseloads. Journal of Human Resources, 35(3), 570–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wurzweiler School of Social Work, Yeshiva University, Amsterdam Ave. 2495, 10033, New York, NY, USA

    Richard K. Caputo

Authors
  1. Richard K. Caputo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard K. Caputo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Caputo, R.K. (2011). TANF and EITC: A Literature Review. In: U.S. Social Welfare Reform. International Series on Consumer Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7674-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation