Advertisement

Composite Sampling with Random Weights

  • Ganapati P. PatilEmail author
  • Sharad D. Gore
  • Charles Taillie*
Chapter
  • 886 Downloads
Part of the Environmental and Ecological Statistics book series (ENES, volume 4)

Abstract

Composite samples are formed by physically mixing aliquots of individual samples. If aliquots of equal volumes are used, then the composite sample values are simply the arithmetic averages of individual sample values. If aliquots are not equal in volume, then statistical techniques need to be adjusted to account for unequal volumes. In this case, the composite sample values are weighted averages of individual sample values. The weights associated with individual sample values are proportional to the volumes of aliquots of the respective individual samples. If volumes of the aliquots are known, so that the weights also are known, then they can be treated as constants. The statistical properties of the composite sample values follow rather easily from those of the individual sample values. However, it can be the case that the volumes of the aliquots are unknown because they have resulted from a random process. In such a case, the statistical properties of the composite sample values depend not only on those of the individual sample values but also on those of the volumes (or, equivalently, of the weights) and are affected by the interrelationships between the individual sample values and the volumes of the aliquots.

Keywords

Composite Sample Individual Sample Unbiased Estimator Dirichlet Distribution Random Weight 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Brown, G. H. and Fisher, N. I. (1972). Subsampling a mixture of sampled material. Technometrics 14:663–668.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cameron, D. R., Nyborg, M., Toogood, J. A., and Laverty, D. H. (1971). Accuracy of field sampling for soil tests. Can. J. Soil Sci. 51:165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carter, R. E. and Lowe, L. E. (1986). Lateral variability of forest floor properties under second-growth Douglas-fir stands and the usefulness of composite sampling techniques. Can. J. For. Res. 16:1128–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elder, R. S. (1977). Properties of composite sampling procedures. Ph.D. Dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar
  5. Elder, R. S., Thompson, W. O., and Myers, R. H. (1980). Properties of composite sampling procedures. Technometrics 22:179–186.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fabius, J. (1973). Two characterizations of the dirichlet distribution. Ann. Stat. 1:583–587.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Harris, D. J. and Keffer, W. J. (1974). Waste water sampling methodologies and flow measurement techniques. Technical Report 907/9-74-005, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  8. Huibregtse, K. R. and Moser, J. H. (1976). Handbook for sampling and sample preservation of water and wastewater. Technical Report Number 600/4-76-049, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  9. Kratochvil, B. and Taylor, J. K. (1981). Sampling for chemical analysis. Anal. Chem. 53:924–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rohde, C. A. (1976). Composite sampling. Biometrics 32:273–282.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Schaeffer, D. J., Kerster, H. W., Bauer, D. R., Rees, K., and McCormick, S. (1983). Composite samples overestimate waste loads. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 55:1387–1392.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ganapati P. Patil
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sharad D. Gore
    • 2
  • Charles Taillie*
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental StatisticsPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsUniversity of PunePuneIndia
  3. 3.Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental StatisticsPenn State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations