Advertisement

Composite Sampling of Soils and Sediments

  • Ganapati P. PatilEmail author
  • Sharad D. Gore
  • Charles Taillie*
Chapter
  • 908 Downloads
Part of the Environmental and Ecological Statistics book series (ENES, volume 4)

Abstract

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has set reporting requirements for polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) spills and views PCB spills as improper disposal of PCBs. The EPA has determined that PCB spills must be controlled and cleaned up. Components of the cleanup process may include, among other things, sampling and analysis to determine the materials spilled. The level of action required is dependent on the amount of spilled liquid, PCB concentration, spill area and dispersion potential, and potential human exposure. A sampling design is proposed by Boomer et al. (1985) for use by EPA enforcement staff. The proposed design involves sampling on a hexagonal grid which is centered on the spill site and extends just beyond its boundaries. Compositing strategies, in which several samples are pooled and analyzed together, are recommended.

Keywords

Composite Sample Individual Sample Hexagonal Grid Exhaustive Testing Grid Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Boomer, B. A., Erickson, M. D., Swanson, S. E., Kelso, G. L., Cox, D. C., and Schultz, B. D. (1985). Verification of PCB spill cleanup by sampling and analysis. EPA Contract No. 68-02-6938, TC 8501-A37.Google Scholar
  2. Boswell, M. T. and Patil, G.P. (1990). Composite sampling using spatial autocorrelation for Palmerton hazardous waste site: A preliminary report. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Superfund Hazardous Waste: Statistical Issues in Characterizing a Site: Protocols, Tools, and Research Needs, H. Lacayo, R. J. Nadeau, G. P. Patil, and L. Zaragoza, eds. USEPA Statistical Policy Branch, Washington DC. pp. 20–42.Google Scholar
  3. Elder, R. S., Thompson, W. O., and Myers, R. H. (1980). Properties of composite sampling procedures. Technometrics 22:179–186.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gore, S. D., Patil, G. P., and Taillie, C. (1992). Studies on the applications of composite sample techniques in hazardous waste site characterization and evaluation: II. Onsite surface soil sampling for PCB at the Armagh Site. 92–0305.Google Scholar
  5. Mason, B. J. (1982). Preparation of soil sampling protocol: techniques and strategies. ETHURA, McLean, VA, under subcontract to Environmental Research Center, University of Nevada, for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
  6. Matern, B. (1960). Spatial variation. Medd for Statens Skogsforskings Institut 49:1–144.Google Scholar
  7. Rohde, C. A. (1976). Composite sampling. Biometrics 32:273–282.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Rossmann, R. (1988). Estimation of trace metal storage in Lake St. Clair post-settlement sediments using composite samples. J. Great Lakes Res. 14:66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ganapati P. Patil
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sharad D. Gore
    • 2
  • Charles Taillie*
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental StatisticsPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsUniversity of PunePuneIndia
  3. 3.Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental StatisticsPenn State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations