Advertisement

Introduction

  • Ganapati P. PatilEmail author
  • Sharad D. Gore
  • Charles Taillie*
Chapter
  • 927 Downloads
Part of the Environmental and Ecological Statistics book series (ENES, volume 4)

Abstract

Environmental problems often arise from a fear that things are changing for the worse. The fear can be about the air we breathe, the water we drink or the soil we tread on. It can be related to the health risk due to a municipal waste sit or a sewage treatment plant. It can be about the epidemic after heavy rains and floods, or about the residues of pesticides in groundwater. These and many other situations call for immediate attention from both the regulatory authority and the affected society. Both then look for solutions at a minimal effort, time and cost. It is therefore important to identify methods that achieve observational economy.

Keywords

Composite Sampling Individual Sample Sampling Unit Finite Population Primary Sampling Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Boswell, M. T. and Patil, G. P. (1987). A perspective of composite sampling. Commun. Stat. Theor. Methods 16:3069–3093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cline, S. M. and Severin, B. F. (1989). Volatile organic losses from a composite water sampler. Water Res. 23:407–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dorfman, R. (1943). The detection of defective members of large populations. Ann. Math. Stat. 14:436–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elder, R. S. (1977). Properties of composite sampling procedures. Ph.D. Dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar
  5. Elder, R. S., Thompson, W. O., and Myers, R. H. (1980). Properties of composite sampling procedures. Technometrics 22:179–186.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. EPA QAMS (1991). Data quality objective process. In Orientation to Quality Assurance Management, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Quality Assurance Management Staff (RD-680), 401  Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460.Google Scholar
  7. Garner, F. C., Stapanian, M. A., and Williams, L. R. (1988). Composite sampling for environmental monitoring. In Principles of Environmental Sampling, L. H. Keith, ed. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. pp. 363–374.Google Scholar
  8. Mack, G. A. and Robinson, P. E. (1985). Use of composited samples to increase the precision and probability of detection of toxic chemicals. In Environmental Applications of Chemometrics, J. J. Breen, and P. E. Robinson, eds. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. pp. 174–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Messner, M. J., Clayton, C. A., Michael, D. I., Neptune, M. D., and Brantley, E. P. (1990). Retrospective design solutions for a remedial investigation. (Supplement to: Quantitative decision making in superfund: A data quality objectives case study. Hazard. Mater. Control 3(3).Google Scholar
  10. Rohde, C. A. (1976). Composite sampling. Biometrics 32:273–282.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Rohde, C. A. (1979). Batch, bulk and composite sampling. In Sampling Biological Populations, R. M. Cormack, G. P. Patil, and D. S. Robson, eds. International Co-operative Publishing House, Fairland, MD. pp. 365–377.Google Scholar
  12. Schaeffer, D. J., Kerster, H. W., and Janardan, K. G. (1982). Monitoring toxics by group testing. Environ. Mgmt. 6:467–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Watson, M. A. (1936). Factors affecting the amount of infection obtained by aphis transmission of the virus Hy. III. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B. 226:457–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Williams, L. R. (1990). Cost-effective sampling and analytical strategies for Superfund—How do we implement them? MS.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ganapati P. Patil
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sharad D. Gore
    • 2
  • Charles Taillie*
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental StatisticsPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsUniversity of PunePuneIndia
  3. 3.Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental StatisticsPenn State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations