Sequential Location Models

  • Hassan Younies
  • H. A. Eiselt
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 155)


Competitive location models have been discussed in the location literature since Hotelling’s (1929) seminal paper. As other location contributions, his model includes customers, who are located in some metric space and who have a demand for some good. This demand may be satisfied by firms that offer the product, given some pricing policy. The difference between standard location problems and competitive location models is that in the competitive case, there are at least two competing firms, who offer the same product. Depending on the complexity of the model under consideration, the differences between the firms may include their different locations, prices, pricing policies, or the attractiveness of their respective facilities.


Market Share Sequential Location Reaction Function Single Facility Leader Firm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The work of the second author was in part supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada. This support is much appreciated. Thanks are also due to Professor Vladimir Marianov for his careful reading of the manuscript and for many helpful suggestions.


  1. Anderson S (1987) Spatial competition and price leadership. Int J Ind Organ 5:369–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhadury J, Eiselt HA, Jaramillo JH (2003) An alternating heuristic for medianod and centroid problems in the plane. Comput Oper Res 30:553–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Choi SC, DeSarbo WS, Harker PT (1990) Product positioning under price competition. Manag Sci 36:175–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dempe S (2002) Foundations of bilevel programming. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. Drezner Z (1982) Competitive location strategies for two facilities. Reg Sci Urban Econ 12:485–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eiselt HA, Laporte G (1996) Sequential location problems. Eur J Oper Res 96:217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghosh A, Buchanan B (1988) Multiple outlets in a duopoly: a first entry paradox. Geogr Anal 20:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hakimi SL (1983) On locating new facilities in a competitive environment. Eur J Oper Res 12:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hakimi SL (1990) Locations with spatial interactions: competitive locations and games. In: Mirchandani PB, Francis RL (eds) Discrete location theory. Wiley, New York, pp 439–478Google Scholar
  10. Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econ J 39:41–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Macias MR, Perez MJ (1995) Competitive location with rectilinear distances. Eur J Oper Res 80:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lai FC (2001) Sequential locations in directional markets. Reg Sci Urban Econ 31:535–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Neven DJ (1987) Endogenous sequential entry in a spatial model. Int J Ind Organ 5:419–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nilssen T (1997) Sequential location when transportation costs are asymmetric. Econ Lett 54:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Plastria F (1997) Profit maximising single competitive facility location in the plane. Stud Locat Anal 11:115–126Google Scholar
  16. Plastria F (2001) Static competitive facility location: an overview of optimization approaches. Eur J Oper Res 129:461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prescott E, Visscher M (1977) Sequential location among firms with foresight. Bell J Econ 8:378–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ReVelle C (1986) The maximum capture or sphere of influence problem: Hotelling revisited on a network. J Reg Sci 26:343–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rothschild R (1976) A note on the effect of sequential entry on choice of location. J Ind Econ 24:313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. von Stackelberg H (1943) Grundlagen der theoretischen Volkswirtschaftslehre. Kohlhammer, Berlin. English edition: von Stackelberg (1952) The Theory of the Market Economy (trans. Peacock AT). W. Hodge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Teitz MB (1968) Locational strategies for competitive systems. J Reg Sci 8:135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Teraoka Y, Osumi S, Hohjo H (2003) Some Stackelberg type location game. Comput Math Applications 46:1147–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementNew York Institute of TechnologyAbu DhabiUnited Arab Emirates
  2. 2.Faculty of Business AdministrationUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations