Advertisement

Achieving Interoperability Through Base Registries for Governmental Services and Document Management

  • Yannis Charalabidis
  • Fenareti Lampathaki
  • Dimitris Askounis
Chapter

Abstract

As digital infrastructures increase their presence worldwide, following the efforts of governments to provide citizens and businesses with high-quality one-stop services, there is a growing need for the systematic management of those newly defined and constantly transforming processes and electronic documents. E-government Interoperability Frameworks usually cater to the technical standards of e-government systems interconnection, but do not address service composition and use by citizens, businesses, or other administrations.

An Interoperability Registry is a system devoted to the formal description, composition, and publishing of traditional or electronic services, together with the relevant document and process descriptions in an integrated schema. Through such a repository, the discovery of services by users or systems can be automated, resulting in an important tool for managing e-government transformation towards achieving interoperability.

The chapter goes beyond the methodology and tools used for developing such a system for the Greek government, to population with services and documents, application, and extraction of useful conclusions for electronic government transformation at the global level.

Keywords

Public Administration Service Composition Business Process Modeling Notation Electronic Service Metadata Schema 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. ALT09.
    Altova XML-Spy Authorware Tools, www.altova.com
  2. AUS09.
    Australian Government, National Archives of Australia, AGLS Metadata Standard, Version 1.3, 2009, http://www.naa.gov.au/records-management/publications/AGLS-Element.aspx (2009)
  3. BAR06.
    Barone A., Di Pietro P.: Semantic of e-Government Processes: A Formal Approach to Service Definition (Arianna), in Proceedings of eGovINTEROP 2006, Bordeaux, France (2006)Google Scholar
  4. BIT09.
    BIT. XRepository, Retrieved June 12, 2009, from https://www.xrepository.deutschland-online.de/ (2009)
  5. BOC08.
    BOC International, The ADONIS Modeling Tool, http://www.boc-group.com/ (2008)
  6. CEN09.
    CEN/ISSS Workshop on Discovery of and Access to e-Government Resources (CEN/ISSS WS/eGov-Share): Sharing e-Government resources: A practical approach for designers and developers, http://www.cen.eu/cenorm/businessdomains/businessdomains/isss/workshops/wsegovshare.asp (2009)
  7. CIA02.
    CIA World Fact Book, The Government type Ontology, http://reliant.teknowledge.com/DAML/Government.owl (2002)
  8. CHA07.
    Charalabidis Y., Lampathaki F., Stassis A.: “A Second-Generation e-Government Interoperability Framework” 5th Eastern European e|Gov Days 2007 in Prague, Austrian Computer Society (2007)Google Scholar
  9. CHA08a.
    Charalabidis, Y., Askounis, D.: Interoperability Registries in e-Government: Developing a Semantically Rich Repository for Electronic Services and Documents of the new Public Administration, in Proceedings of the 41st Hawaiian International Conference of System Sciences, HICCS-08, Hawaii (2008)Google Scholar
  10. CHA08b.
    Charalabidis, Y., Lampathaki, F., Askounis, D.: “Unified Data Modeling and Document Standardization Using Core Components Technical Specification for Electronic Government Applications”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 3(3), 38–51 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CHA09a.
    Charalabidis, Y., Lampathaki, F., Psarras, J.: Combination of Interoperability Registries with Process and Data Management Tools for Governmental Services Transformation, in Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaiian International Conference of System Sciences, HICCS-09, Hawaii (2009)Google Scholar
  12. CHA09b.
    Charalabidis, Y., Lampathaki, F., Askounis, D.: Metadata Sets for e-Government Resources: The Extended e-Government Metadata Schema (eGMS+), Lecture Notes on Computer Science, vol. 5693, pp. 341–352, in Proceedings of 8th EGOV Conference 2009, Linz Austria (2009)Google Scholar
  13. DAM01.
    DAML, The Government R&D Ontology, http://www.daml.org/projects/integration/projects-20010811 (2001)
  14. DAN09.
    Danish E-government Project, InfostructureBase, http://isb.oio.dk/info (2009)
  15. DIP04.
  16. DUB07.
    Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1, Retrieved January 25, 2007 from http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/ (2007)
  17. EST06.
    Estonian Government, Estonian Information Society Strategy 2013, ec.europa.eu/idabc/en/document/6811/254 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. EUR07.
    European Commission, The i2010 eGovernment Action Plan, http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doc?id=25286 (2007)
  19. FRA03.
    Fraser J., Adams N., Macintosh A., Mckay-Hubbard A., Lobo T.P., Pardo P.F., Martinez R.C., Vallecillo J.S.: “Knowledge Management Applied to E-Government Services: The Use of an Ontology”, Knowledge Management In Electronic Government, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2645, pp. 116–126, Springer, Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
  20. GON06.
    Gong R., Li Q., Ning K., Chen Y., O’Sullivan D.: “Business Process Collaboration Using Semantic Interoperability: Review and Framework”, in Semantic Web – ASWC 2006 Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin (2006)Google Scholar
  21. GRE07.
    Greek Government, The Greek Digital Strategy 2006–2013, http://www.infosoc.gr/infosoc/en-UK/sthnellada/committee/default1/top.htm (2007)
  22. GRE08.
    Greek Government, eGovernment Interoperability Framework, http://www.e-gif.gov.gr (2008)
  23. GUI07.
    Guijarro L.: “Interoperability Frameworks and Enterprise Architectures in E-Government Initiatives in Europe and the United States”, Government Information Quarterly 24(1): 89–101, Elsevier Inc. (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. IDA07.
    IDABC, European Interoperability Framework for pan-European e-Government Services, Version 1.0, Retrieved February 5, 2007 from http://europa.eu.int/idabc/en/document/3761 (2007)
  25. IDA08.
    IDABC European Interoperability Framework draft, Version 2.0, http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doc?id=31508 (2008)
  26. IDA09.
    IDABC Management Information Resources for e-Government, http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/en/document/3615/5585 (2009)
  27. LAM07.
    Lampathaki, F., Charalabidis, Y., Sarantis, D., Koussouris, S., Askounis, D.: E-Government Services Composition Using Multi-faceted Metadata Classification Structures, in Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, H.J., Grönlund, A. (eds.), Proceedings of 6th EGOV Conference 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4656, Springer, Berlin, pp. 116–126 (2007)Google Scholar
  28. OMG06.
    OMG Business Process Modelling Notation (BPMN) Specification, Final Adopted Specification http://www.bpmn.org/Documents/OMG%20Final%20Adopted%20BPMN%201-0%20Spec%2006-02-1.pdf (2006)
  29. PAL08.
    Palmonari, M., Viscusi, G., Batini, C.: “A Semantic Repository Approach to Improve the Government to Business Relationship”, Data & Knowledge Engineering, 65: 485–511 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. SEN07.
    Seng J.L., Lin W.: “An Ontology-Assisted Analysis in Aligning Business Process with E-Commerce Standards”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(3–4): 415–437, Emerald Group Publishing (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. SEM09.
    SEMIC.EU (Semantic Interoperability Centre Europe), http://www.semic.eu (2009)
  32. SOU08.
    Sourouni, A.-M., Lampathaki, F., Mouzakitis, S., Charalabidis, Y., Askounis, D.: Paving the Way to e-Government Transformation Interoperability Registry Infrastructure Development, in Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, H.J., Ferro, E. (eds.), Proceedings of 7th EGOV Conference 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5184, Springer, Berlin, pp. 340–351 (2008)Google Scholar
  33. STA09.
    State Services Commission, NZGLS Metadata Element Set, Version 2.1, http://www.e.govt.nz/standards/nzgls/standard/element-set-21/nzgls-element-set-2-1.pdf
  34. TAM05.
    Tambouris E., Tarabanis K.: “Overview of DC-based E-Driven eGovernment Service Architecture”, Electronic Government, in Proceedings Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3591: 237–248, Springer, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  35. UKC07.
    UK Cabinet Office – Office of the e-Envoy, e-Government Metadata Standard, Version 3.1, Retrieved February 5, 2007 from http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/documents/eGMS%20version%203_1.pdf (2007)
  36. UKC09.
    UK Cabinet Office, UK GovTalk Schema Library, http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/schemasstandards/schemalibrary.asp (2009)
  37. UN07.
    UN/CEFACT Core Components Technical Specification, Part 8 of the ebXML Framework, Version 2.01, Retrieved January 25, 2007 from http://www.unece.org/cefact/ebxml/CCTS_V2-01_Final.pdf (2007)
  38. WIM06.
    Wimmer, M.: “Implementing a Knowledge Portal for e-Government Based on Semantic Modeling: The e-Government Intelligent Portal (eip.at)”, in Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’06), Track 4, p. 82b (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer New York 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yannis Charalabidis
    • 1
  • Fenareti Lampathaki
  • Dimitris Askounis
  1. 1.Department of Information and Communication Systems EngineeringUniversity of the Aegean, School of SciencesKarlovassiGreece

Personalised recommendations