Abstract
Brazilian higher education institutions (HEIs) have been established since the first half of the nineteenth century under the format of colleges of medicine, law, or engineering. Brazilian universities (HEIs with a poly-disciplinary structure), however, were established more recently. The first university was created in 1920, in Rio de Janeiro, by the Federal Government and, in 1934, the State of São Paulo created its own university, which remains a Brazilian landmark of teaching and research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I, II Plan for Scientific and Technological Development (PBDCT), II National Development Plan (PND).
- 2.
In the Political Arena, this period coincided with the return to democracy most salient characteristics include indirect election although a civilian present on and the adoption of the new constitution in 1988.
- 3.
Automobile, pharmaceutical, capital goods and equipment and cement industries.
- 4.
Between 1980 and 1994 the annual rate was above 100% with rates greater than 1,000% per year between 1988 and 1994 and reaching 2,700% in 1993 (see http://www.ipea.gov.br/ipeadata, accessed 21/11/2006).
- 5.
According to Decree Law no. 719 of July 31, 1969
- 6.
Guimarães, 1995.
- 7.
PINTEC is the Brazilian Technological Innovation Survey.
- 8.
According to the Survey of Business (Cadastro Central de Empresas) by the IBGE, in 2004, Brazil had 5,371,291 active businesses; that is private businesses, government agencies and other private not-for-profit entities. Of this total, 9.2% correspond to transformation industries.
- 9.
Opinion no 977/65, C.E.Su, approved. December 3, 1965. Definitions of graduate courses published 03/12/1965.
- 10.
See Sinopse da Educação Superior – 2004 http://www.inep.gov.br/superior/censosuperior/default.asp e www.edudatabrasil.inep.gov.br.
- 11.
http://www.capes.goc.br: National Plan for Graduate Studies 2006–2010.
- 12.
A rate much lower than that of Germany which graduates an average of 30 PhDs per 100,000 population, South Korea with 13.6 or Japan with 12.1. In 2003, the number for South Korea was three times that of Brazil.
- 13.
The Government of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, was inaugurated in 2003 and reelected in 2006.
- 14.
Medida Provisória no. 213/2004 e Lei no. 11.096 January 13, 2005.
- 15.
The State University of Rio de Janeiro was one of the first to introduce reservation of places for black students.
- 16.
A multiplication of corporate universities established by major corporations or banks is also occurring.
- 17.
CAPES 2004b.
- 18.
At the University of São Carlos in the State of São Paulo and at the Federal University of Santa Catarina.
- 19.
USPTO – United States Patent and trademark Office.
- 20.
The same proportion of the beginning of the nineties.
- 21.
Law No. 10.973, enacted in December 2004.
- 22.
From the statement of reasons for the draft of Law 2001.
- 23.
FORPROEX – Public Universities Extension Pro-rectors Forum.
Referencems
Albuquerque, E., Sicsu, J. (2000). “Inovação institucional e estímulo ao investimento privado”. São Paulo Perspec. [Online]: vol. 14, no. 3, p. 108–114. Available at http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php in 04/10/06.
Bell, M., Pavitt, K. (1993). “Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts Between Developed and Developing Countries” Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 157–210.
Buarque, C. (2003). “The University at a crossroad”. Paper presented at the World Conference on Higher Education + 5 at UNESCO. Paris, 23–25 June.
CAPES (2004). “Plano Nacional de Pós-Graduação (PNPG) 2005–2010”. Brasília: CAPES/MEC.
Carvalho, P. (2006). “O papel da propriedade industrial no estímulo à inovação – a experiência da UNICAMP”. Seminário Transferência e Inovação Tecnológica. Curitiba: UFPR, 11/05/2006.
Cavalcante, C. (2005). “Educação e inovação: o papel e o desafio das engenharias na promoção do desenvolvimento industrial, científico e tecnológico”. Parcerias Estratégicas, no. 21, Brasília.
CNPq website, www.cnpq.br – in 20-31/01/2006
Etzkowitz, H., Mello, J.M.C., Alemida, M. (2005). “Toward “meta innovation” in Brazil. The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix”. Research Policy, vol. 34, no. 4, p. 411–424.
Guimarães, R. (1995). “FNDCT: uma nova missão”. In: Schwartzman, S. (coord.) “Ciência e Tecnologia no Brasil: Uma Nova Política para um Mundo Global” (II PADCT). Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas.
IBGE (2002). “Diretoria de Pesquisas Departamento de Indústria Pesquisa Industrial Inovação Tecnológica 2000”. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
IBGE (2004). “Pesquisa Nacional de por Amostra de Domicílios 2004”. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
IBGE (2005). “Diretoria de Pesquisas Coordenação de Indústria Pesquisa Industrial de Inovação Tecnológica 2003” Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
IBGE (2006). “Cadastro Central de Empresas 2004”. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
IBGE (2007). “Diretoria de Pesquisas Coordenação de Indústria Pesquisa de Inovação Tecnológica 2005” Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
IBGE (2008). “Síntese dos Indicadores Sociais”. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
INEP (2009). “Sinopse da Educação Superior – 2008”. Available at: www.inep.gov.br.
IPEADATA (online) http://www.ipeadata.gov.br in 22/11/2006 and 28/03/2008.
Maculan, A.M.D. (1996). “From research to innovation: the Brazilian experience with business incubators”. In: Universities and the global knowledge economy: A Triple Helix University-Industry-Government Relations, 1996, Amsterdam. Book of Abstracts. Universities and the global knowledge economy. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, vol. 1. p. 80–86.
Maculan, A.M.D. (2005) “Capacitação tecnológica e inovação nas empresas brasileiras: balanço e perspectives”. Rio de Janeiro. FGV Cadernos EBAPE. BR. Special edition Management of Innovation Technology in the context of Emerging Economies: The Experience of Companies in Brazil.
MCT (2008). “Brasil”: Alunos titulados nos cursos de mestrado e doulorado, 1987–2007.
MEC (2004). Anteprojeto de Lei – versao preliminar dezembro de 2004. Avaialble at: www.portal.mec.gov.br.
Rezende, S. (2005). “Ciência, tecnologia e inovação para o desenvolvimento nacional: o papel do MCT”. [s.l.]: Science, Technology and Innovation Conference, Brasília, November 18, 2005.
Viotti, E. (2002). “National learning systems: a new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea”. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, n. 69.
Viotti, E., Baessa, A., Koeller, P. (2005). “Perfil da Inovação na Indústria Brasileira – Uma Comparação Internacional”. cap. 16 in Salerno, M. and De Negri, João (eds.), “Inovação, padrões tecnológicos e desempenho das firmas industriais brasileiras”, Brasília, IPEA, 2005, p. 653–687.
Viotti (2006). “O crescimento da produção científica brasileira”. Brasília: (mimeo).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 International Development Research Centre
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Mello, J.M.C., Maculan, AM., Renault, T.B. (2011). Brazilian Universities and Their Contribution to Innovation and Development. In: Göransson, B., Brundenius, C. (eds) Universities in Transition. Insight and Innovation in International Development. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7509-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7509-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7508-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7509-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)