Skip to main content

Brazilian Universities and Their Contribution to Innovation and Development

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Insight and Innovation in International Development ((IIID))

Abstract

Brazilian higher education institutions (HEIs) have been established since the first half of the nineteenth century under the format of colleges of medicine, law, or engineering. Brazilian universities (HEIs with a poly-disciplinary structure), however, were established more recently. The first university was created in 1920, in Rio de Janeiro, by the Federal Government and, in 1934, the State of São Paulo created its own university, which remains a Brazilian landmark of teaching and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I, II Plan for Scientific and Technological Development (PBDCT), II National Development Plan (PND).

  2. 2.

    In the Political Arena, this period coincided with the return to democracy most salient characteristics include indirect election although a civilian present on and the adoption of the new constitution in 1988.

  3. 3.

    Automobile, pharmaceutical, capital goods and equipment and cement industries.

  4. 4.

    Between 1980 and 1994 the annual rate was above 100% with rates greater than 1,000% per year between 1988 and 1994 and reaching 2,700% in 1993 (see http://www.ipea.gov.br/ipeadata, accessed 21/11/2006).

  5. 5.

    According to Decree Law no. 719 of July 31, 1969

  6. 6.

    Guimarães, 1995.

  7. 7.

    PINTEC is the Brazilian Technological Innovation Survey.

  8. 8.

    According to the Survey of Business (Cadastro Central de Empresas) by the IBGE, in 2004, Brazil had 5,371,291 active businesses; that is private businesses, government agencies and other private not-for-profit entities. Of this total, 9.2% correspond to transformation industries.

  9. 9.

    Opinion no 977/65, C.E.Su, approved. December 3, 1965. Definitions of graduate courses published 03/12/1965.

  10. 10.

    See Sinopse da Educação Superior – 2004 http://www.inep.gov.br/superior/censosuperior/default.asp e www.edudatabrasil.inep.gov.br.

  11. 11.

    http://www.capes.goc.br: National Plan for Graduate Studies 2006–2010.

  12. 12.

    A rate much lower than that of Germany which graduates an average of 30 PhDs per 100,000 population, South Korea with 13.6 or Japan with 12.1. In 2003, the number for South Korea was three times that of Brazil.

  13. 13.

    The Government of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, was inaugurated in 2003 and reelected in 2006.

  14. 14.

    Medida Provisória no. 213/2004 e Lei no. 11.096 January 13, 2005.

  15. 15.

    The State University of Rio de Janeiro was one of the first to introduce reservation of places for black students.

  16. 16.

    A multiplication of corporate universities established by major corporations or banks is also occurring.

  17. 17.

    CAPES 2004b.

  18. 18.

    At the University of São Carlos in the State of São Paulo and at the Federal University of Santa Catarina.

  19. 19.

    USPTO – United States Patent and trademark Office.

  20. 20.

    The same proportion of the beginning of the nineties.

  21. 21.

    Law No. 10.973, enacted in December 2004.

  22. 22.

    From the statement of reasons for the draft of Law 2001.

  23. 23.

    FORPROEX – Public Universities Extension Pro-rectors Forum.

Referencems

  • Albuquerque, E., Sicsu, J. (2000). “Inovação institucional e estímulo ao investimento privado”. São Paulo Perspec. [Online]: vol. 14, no. 3, p. 108–114. Available at http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php in 04/10/06.

  • Bell, M., Pavitt, K. (1993). “Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts Between Developed and Developing Countries” Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 157–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buarque, C. (2003). “The University at a crossroad”. Paper presented at the World Conference on Higher Education + 5 at UNESCO. Paris, 23–25 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAPES (2004). “Plano Nacional de Pós-Graduação (PNPG) 2005–2010”. Brasília: CAPES/MEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, P. (2006). “O papel da propriedade industrial no estímulo à inovação – a experiência da UNICAMP”. Seminário Transferência e Inovação Tecnológica. Curitiba: UFPR, 11/05/2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcante, C. (2005). “Educação e inovação: o papel e o desafio das engenharias na promoção do desenvolvimento industrial, científico e tecnológico”. Parcerias Estratégicas, no. 21, Brasília.

    Google Scholar 

  • CNPq website, www.cnpq.br – in 20-31/01/2006

  • Etzkowitz, H., Mello, J.M.C., Alemida, M. (2005). “Toward “meta innovation” in Brazil. The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix”. Research Policy, vol. 34, no. 4, p. 411–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães, R. (1995). “FNDCT: uma nova missão”. In: Schwartzman, S. (coord.) “Ciência e Tecnologia no Brasil: Uma Nova Política para um Mundo Global” (II PADCT). Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE (2002). “Diretoria de Pesquisas Departamento de Indústria Pesquisa Industrial Inovação Tecnológica 2000”. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE (2004). “Pesquisa Nacional de por Amostra de Domicílios 2004”. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE (2005). “Diretoria de Pesquisas Coordenação de Indústria Pesquisa Industrial de Inovação Tecnológica 2003” Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE (2006). “Cadastro Central de Empresas 2004”. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE (2007). “Diretoria de Pesquisas Coordenação de Indústria Pesquisa de Inovação Tecnológica 2005” Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBGE (2008). “Síntese dos Indicadores Sociais”. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEP (2009). “Sinopse da Educação Superior – 2008”. Available at: www.inep.gov.br.

  • IPEADATA (online) http://www.ipeadata.gov.br in 22/11/2006 and 28/03/2008.

  • Maculan, A.M.D. (1996). “From research to innovation: the Brazilian experience with business incubators”. In: Universities and the global knowledge economy: A Triple Helix University-Industry-Government Relations, 1996, Amsterdam. Book of Abstracts. Universities and the global knowledge economy. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, vol. 1. p. 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maculan, A.M.D. (2005) “Capacitação tecnológica e inovação nas empresas brasileiras: balanço e perspectives”. Rio de Janeiro. FGV Cadernos EBAPE. BR. Special edition Management of Innovation Technology in the context of Emerging Economies: The Experience of Companies in Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCT (2008). “Brasil”: Alunos titulados nos cursos de mestrado e doulorado, 1987–2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEC (2004). Anteprojeto de Lei – versao preliminar dezembro de 2004. Avaialble at: www.portal.mec.gov.br.

  • Rezende, S. (2005). “Ciência, tecnologia e inovação para o desenvolvimento nacional: o papel do MCT”. [s.l.]: Science, Technology and Innovation Conference, Brasília, November 18, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viotti, E. (2002). “National learning systems: a new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea”. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, n. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viotti, E., Baessa, A., Koeller, P. (2005). “Perfil da Inovação na Indústria Brasileira – Uma Comparação Internacional”. cap. 16 in Salerno, M. and De Negri, João (eds.), “Inovação, padrões tecnológicos e desempenho das firmas industriais brasileiras”, Brasília, IPEA, 2005, p. 653–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viotti (2006). “O crescimento da produção científica brasileira”. Brasília: (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Manoel Carvalho de Mello .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 International Development Research Centre

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Mello, J.M.C., Maculan, AM., Renault, T.B. (2011). Brazilian Universities and Their Contribution to Innovation and Development. In: Göransson, B., Brundenius, C. (eds) Universities in Transition. Insight and Innovation in International Development. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7509-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics