Abstract
Latvia is a small country with 2.3 million inhabitants located in the North-East Europe at the Eastern coast of the Baltic Sea. It is a catching-up economy, which in the 1990s underwent political and economic transformation from an authoritarian communist party rule and centrally planned socialist economy to a democratic multiparty government and liberal market economy. In 1991, Latvia regained its political independence from the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), which also largely implied breaking the economic ties with the ex-Soviet economic structures in which the Latvian economy had been deeply integrated during the previous 50 years.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Latvia became a Member State of the EU on 1 May 2004.
- 2.
Prestructural funds (for candidate countries) and structural funds (for member states) are funds allocated by the European Union allowing national governments to grant financial assistance to resolve structural economic and social problems.
- 3.
The Lisbon Strategy, also known as the Lisbon Agenda or Lisbon Process, is an action and development plan for the European Union. It was set out by the European Council in Lisbon on March 2000. According to this strategy, the EU set itself a new strategic goal for the next decade to become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, capable of sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs, and greater social cohesion by 2010. It was relaunched as the “Community Lisbon program” in 2005 with the new focus on growth and employment. Subsequently, each Member State had to elaborate its national reform plan in meeting the set goals.
- 4.
The ethnic composition of Latvian population is as follows: Latvians – 59.2%, Russians – 28%, Byelorussians – 3.6%, Ukrainians – 2.5%, Poles – 2.3%, Lithuanians – 1.3%, Jews – 0.4%, and other nationalities –2.7%.
- 5.
In 2007/2008, the share of students in HEIs funded by public resources made up only 25%, compared with 75% funded by private ones (CSB 2009, p. 7).
- 6.
Reforms included involvement of commercial banks in actual lending to students, while the government continued to provide a subsidized loan interest rate, grace period, loan forgiveness, and assumed its role as a second guarantor for 90% of loan amount to students (Kasa 2008, pp. 90–91).
- 7.
Reforms included involvement of commercial banks in actual lending to students, while the government continued to provide a subsidized loan interest rate, grace period, loan forgiveness, and assumed its role as a second guarantor for 90% of loan amount to students (Kasa 2008, pp. 90–91).
- 8.
It is difficult to obtain reliable data on exact share of working students. In their sample of undergraduate social science students, Auers et al. (2007, pp. 482–483) found that 44% of respondents are working. But as their survey was carried out before or after compulsory classes, they admit a risk that working students may be under-represented as they are less likely to attend classes. Auers et al. (2007, p. 481) cite results of the survey carried out by the Latvian Student’s Association, indicating that 54% of students were employed. Among graduate students, almost all are working.
- 9.
Following the example of Finland in the 1980s, the scientific community of Latvia advocated 0.1% increase for several years, while the current provision is based on more recent calculations of the Minister of Education and Science in order to reach 1% by 2010.
- 10.
LVL = 1.423 EUR = 1.721 USD (rate on 31 January 2006).
- 11.
On 30 May 2006, the Cabinet of Ministers approved nine thematic priorities for funding basic and applied research for 2006–2009: agrobiotechnology, biomedicine and pharmacy, energy, information technologies, Latvian studies, material science, forestry, health, and environmental science.
References
Adamsone-Fiskovica, A., Kristapsons, J., Ulnicane-Ozolina, I. (2008). INNO-policy trendchart – policy trends and appraisal report: Latvia. European Commission, Enterprise Directorate-General.
Adamsone-Fiskovica, A., Kristapsons, J., Lulle, A. (2009a). Erawatch analytical country report 2009: Latvia. analysis of policy mixes to foster R&D investment and to contribute to the ERA. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research.
Adamsone-Fiskovica, A., Kristapsons, J., Tjunina, E., Ulnicane-Ozolina, I. (2009b). “Moving beyond teaching and research: economic and social tasks of universities in Latvia.” Science and Public Policy, Vol. 36, No 2, March, pp. 133–137.
Auers, D., Rostoks, T., Smith, K. (2007). “Flipping burgers or flipping pages? Student employment and academic attainment in post-Soviet Latvia.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 40, pp. 477–491.
Balazs, K., Faulkner, W., Schimank, U. (eds.). (1995). “The research system in post-communist Central and Eastern Europe.” Social Studies of Science, Vol. 25, No 4, EASST Special Issue.
Bilinskis, I., Ekmanis, J., Jansons, J., Borzovs, J., Cvetkova, I., Aispurs, V., Elerts, M., Avotins, V., Tjuņina, E. (2005). Recommendations for funding research activity through the attraction of private sector investments (in Latvian). Riga: Ministry of Economics.
Brunner, J. J. (2003). Latvia higher education: changing conditions, problems, challenges and policy options. The World Bank Europe and Central Asia Human Development.
Bundule, M., Jansons, J. (2005). “International scientific cooperation.” In: Building knowledge society, Elmars Grens (ed.). Strategic Analysis Commission. Riga: Zinatne, pp. 70–92 (in Latvian).
Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia (2006). Research and development, and innovation statistics. Riga: Statistical Data Collection.
Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia (2008). Research and development, and innovation statistics. Riga: Statistical Data Collection.
Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia (2009). Educational institutions in Latvia in the beginning of the academic year 2008/2009. Bulletin, Riga (in Latvian).
Danish Research Councils (1992). Latvian research: an international evaluation. Copenhagen: Danish Research Councils.
Göransson, B., Naharajh, R., Schmoch, U. (2009). “New activities of universities in transfer and extension: multiple requirements and manifold solutions.” Science and Public Policy, Vol. 36, No 2, pp. 157–164.
Ekmanis, J. (2005). “Current trends of science development in Latvia. Toward building a knowledge-based society.” Proceedings of the Strategic Analysis Commission, Vol. 2, No 3, pp. 30–39. Riga: Zinatne Publishers (in Latvian).
Ekmanis, J. (2007). Opening speech of the president of the academy of sciences at the general meeting of the academy on 22 November, 2007. In: Yearbook 2006/2007 of the Latvian Academy of Sciences, pp. 177–179. Riga: Zinatne Publishers.
Etzkowitz, H. (2000). “Technology transfer and the East European transition.” Science and Public Policy, Vol. 27, No 4, pp. 230–234.
European Communities (2009). European innovation scoreboard 2008. Comparative analysis of innovation performance. PRO INNO Europe paper N°10. Belgium: European Commission, DG Enterprise and Industry.
Grens, E. (2005). “Building a knowledge society.” Proceedings of the Strategic Analysis Commission, Vol. 2, No 3, pp. 7–11. Riga: Zinatne Publishers (in Latvian).
Grens, E. (2007). “Science, research and innovation: advancing Latvia’s development.” Proceedings of the Strategic Analysis Commission, Vol. 3, No (14), pp. 7–9. Riga: Zinatne Publishers (in Latvian).
Gulans, P. (2005). Speech at the general meeting of the academy of sciences, April 14, 2005. Zinatnes Vestnesis, April (in Latvian).
Gunnes, H. (2009). NORBAL – statistics on awarded doctoral degrees and doctoral students in the Nordic and Baltic Countries: main findings – 2007. NIFU STEP.
Hirschhausen, C. von, Bitzer, J. (eds.) (2000). The globalisation of industry and innovation in Eastern Europe: from post-socialist restructuring to international competitiveness. Great Britain: Edward Elgar.
JIRD (Journal of International Relations and Development) (2002). Special issue In Search of growth strategies: innovation policy in EU accession countries, Vol. 5, No 4.
Kasa, R. (2008). “Aspects of fiscal federalism in higher education cost sharing in Latvia.” Peabody Journal of Education, Vol. 83, No 1, pp. 86–100.
Kristapsons, J., Martinson, H., Dagyte, I. (2003). Baltic R&D systems in transition: experiences and future prospects. Riga: Zinatne.
Kristapsons, J., Tjunina, E., Adamsone-Fiskovica, A. (2004). Latvian scientific publications, citation indices, patenting activity. Riga: Centre for Science and Technology Studies of the Latvian Academy of Sciences (in Latvian).
Kristapsons, J., Adamsone-Fiskovica, A., Ulnicane-Ozolina, I. (2009). ERAWATCH country report 2008 – an assessment of research system and policies: Latvia. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, European Commission, Directorate-General for Research.
Meske, W. (ed.) (2004). From system transformation to European integration: science and technology in central and Eastern Europe at the beginning of the 21st century: Münster LIT Verlag.
Meske, W., Mosoni-Fried, J., Etzkowitz, H., Nesvetailov, G. (eds.) (1998). Transforming science and technology systems – the endless transition? NATO Science Series 4: Science and Technology Policy, Vol. 23, Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Ministry of Economics (2008). Economic development in Latvia. December, Riga.
MoES (2005). R&D in Latvia, 3rd revised edition. Riga Ministry of Education and Science.
MoES (2008a). Latvia in EC 6th framework programme 2002–2006. Riga Ministry of Education and Science.
MoES (2008b). Report on higher education in Latvia in 2007 (figures, facts, trends). Riga: Department of Higher Education (in Latvian). Ministry of Education and Science.
MoES (2009). Draft guidelines for development of science and technology for 2009–2013. Riga. Ministry of Education and Science.
Muiznieks, I. (2005). “The future of universities and scientific activities.” In: Building knowledge society, Elmars Grens (ed.). Strategic Analysis Commission. Riga: Zinatne, pp. 93–120. (in Latvian).
Radosevic, S. (1999). “Transformation of science and technology systems into systems of innovation in Central and Eastern Europe: the emerging patterns and determinants.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 10, pp. 277–320.
RIS Latvia (2004). The Latvian innovation system: strategy and action plan 2005–2010. Available at: http://www.innovation.lv/ris/Latv/Dokum/RIS_Strategy_Latvia.pdf.
SCImago (2007). SJR – SCImago journal & country rank. Available at: http://www.scimagojr.com (Retrieved on 19 August 2009).
Stradins, J. (1982). Sketches on the history of Latvian science. Riga: Zinatne (in Latvian).
Stradins, J. (1998). Latvian academy of sciences – origin, history, transformation. Riga: Zinatne (in Latvian).
Stradins, J. (2000). “Science in Latvia – trends, topics, traditions”. In: Yearbook 1999, P. Kauranen (ed.). Helsinki: Finnish Academy of Science and Letters, pp. 63–73.
University of Latvia (2004). Development strategy of the university of Latvia. Riga. Available at: http://www.lu.lv/dokumenti/resursi/attistibas-strategija.doc (in Latvian).
Watkins, A., Agapitova, N. (2004). Creating a 21st century national innovation system for a 21st century Latvian economy. Policy Research Working Paper WPS3457. World Bank: Washington D.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 International Development Research Centre
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adamsone-Fiskovica, A., Kristapsons, J., Tjunina, E., Ulnicane-Ozolina, I. (2011). Latvia: Repositioning of Academic Institutions in a Catching-Up Country. In: Göransson, B., Brundenius, C. (eds) Universities in Transition. Insight and Innovation in International Development. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7509-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7509-6_11
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7508-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7509-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)