Skip to main content

Sensory Evaluation in Quality Control

  • Chapter
Sensory Evaluation of Food

Part of the book series: Food science text series ((FSTS))

  • 1408 Accesses

Abstract

It goes without saying that food and consumer product manufacturers are concerned with ensuring the quality of the products they sell. Lately, quality has become a corporate rallying cry. A whole industry of quality specialists has sprung up to introduce popular quality assurance programs with catchy names like “total quality management” Beyond the cheerleading, corporate buzz-words, and maze of consultants lies an honest concern with the delivery and appeal of finished products that will produce consumer satisfaction, brand loyalty, repurchase, and low incidence of consumer complaints.

Consumer researchers are well aware of the quality of products. The food industry constantly faces the demand to maintain both quality and profitability simultaneously. Quality, however, is an elusive concept and as such must be operationalized and measured in order for it to be maintained.”—H.R. Moskowitz (1995).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amerine, M.R., and Roessler, E.B. 1981. Wines, Their Sensory Evaluation, 2d ed. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amerine, M.R., Pangborn, R.M., and Roessler, E.B. 1965. Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Foods. Academic, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aust, L.B., Gacula, M.C., Beard, S.A., and Washam, R.W. 1985. Degree of difference test method in sensory evaluation of heterogeneous product types. Journal of Food Science, 50, 511–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, H.E., and Taubert, C. 1984. Why quality assurance is necessary and important to plant management. Food Technology, 38 (4), 101–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckley, J.P., and Kroll, D.R. 1996. Searching for sensory research excellence. Food Technology, 50 (2), 61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodyfelt, F.W., Tobias, J., and Trout, G.M. 1988. Sensory Evaluation of Dairy Products. Van Nostrand/AVI Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressan, L.P., and Behling, R.W. 1977. The selection and training of judges for discrimination testing. Food Technology, 31, 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardello, A.V. 1995. Food Quality: relativity, context and consumer expectations. Food Quality and Preference, 6, 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, D.K. 1985. Plant sensory evaluation within a multiplant international organization. Food Technology, 39 (11), 130–133, 142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethmers, A.E. 1979. Utilizing sensory evaluation to determine product shelf life. Food Technology, 33 (9), 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D.A. 1987. Competing on the eight dimensions of quality. Harvard Business Review, 65 (6), 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillette, M.H., and Beckley, J.H. 1992. In-plant sensory quality assurance. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting, Institute of Food Technologists, New Orleans, LA, June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldwyn, C., and Lawless, H. 1991. How to taste wine. ASTM Standardization News, 19 (3), 32–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, E., Dunkley, W, Bodyfelt, F., Larmond, E., and Lindsay, R. 1986. Report of the committee on sensory data to the journal management committee. Journal of Dairy Science, 69, 298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, H.T. 1995. Dimensions of quality: a critique. Food Quality and Preference, 6, 191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, H.T., and Claassen, M.R. 1993. Validity of descriptive and defect-oriented terminology systems for sensory analysis of fluid milk. Journal of Food Science, 58, 108–112, 119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y.F. 1994. Small panel wine hedonic and quality assessment. M. Sc. Thesis, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastrian, L.K. 1985. The sensory evaluation program within a small processing operation. Food Technology, 39 (11), 127–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, R.L., and Hall, C. 1979. Cheese grading versus consumer acceptability: an inevitable discrepancy. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology (June), 66–68

    Google Scholar 

  • McNutt, K. 1988. Consumer attitudes and the quality control function. Food Technology, 42 (12), 97, 98, 108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, H.R. 1995. Food Quality: conceptual and sensory aspects. Food Quality and Preference, 6, 157–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz, A.M., Civille, G.V., and Carr, B.T. 1992. Sensory Evaluation in Quality Control. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama, M., and Wessman, C. 1979. Application of sensory evaluation to the rou-tine maintenance of product quality. Food Technology, 33 (9), 38–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J., and Trout, G.M. 1964. Judging Dairy Products. AVI, Westport, CT. O’Mahony, M. 1981. Our industry today: psychophysical aspects of sensory analysis of dairy products: a critique. Journal of Dairy Science, 62, 1954–1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ough, C.S., and Baker, G.A. 1961. Small panel sensory evaluations of wines by scor-ing. Hilgardia, 30, 587–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pangborn, R.M., and Dunkley, W.L. 1964. Laboratory procedures for evaluating the sensory properties of milk. Dairy Science Abstracts, 26, 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reece, R.N. 1979. A quality assurance perspective on sensory evaluation. Food Technology, 33 (9), 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regenstein, J.M. 1983. What is fish quality? Infofish (June), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutenbeck, S.K. 1985. Initiating an in-plant quality control/sensory evaluation program. Food Technology, 39 (11), 124–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidel, J.L., Stone, H., and Bloomquist, J. 1981. Use and misuse of sensory evaluation in research and quality control. Journal of Dairy Science, 64, 2292–2302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, G.E.A. 1990. The psychology of novice and expert wine talk. American Journal of Psychology, 103, 495–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, S.G.,Vaisey-Genser, M., and Eskin, N.A.M. 1984. Quality control in the use of deep frying oils. Journal of the American Oil Chemist’s Society, 61, 1102–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, J.C. 1985. Coordinating sensory evaluation in a multiplant operation. Food Technology, 39 (11), 134–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R.H., and Pearson, A.M. 1977. Quantitative determination of 5 Androst16-en-3-one by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and its relationship to sex odor intensity of pork. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 25, 1241–1245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trant, A.S., Pangborn, R.M., and Little, A.C. 1981. Potential fallacy of correlating hedonic responses with physical and chemical measurements. Journal of Food Science, 46, 583–588.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, K.A. 1979. Use of reference standards for sensory evaluation of product quality. Food Technology, 33 (9), 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • York, R.K. 1995. Quality assessment in a regulatory environment. Food Quality and Preference, 6, 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lawless, H.T., Heymann, H. (1999). Sensory Evaluation in Quality Control. In: Sensory Evaluation of Food. Food science text series. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7452-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7452-5_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-6499-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7452-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics