Why Real-Time Transaction Processing Fails to Capture the Context Required for Decision Support

  • Fergal CartonEmail author
  • Frederic Adam
  • Patrick Brézillon
Part of the Annals of Information Systems book series (AOIS, volume 13)


This chapter considers the problems in providing real-time decision ­support to managers using our observations of the distribution process in a case study of a multinational manufacturing firm. This firm is characterised by its ­reliance on an ERP (enterprise resource planning) package for transaction ­processing, but is also known for its use of more complex technical architectures for ­decision support. Our observations reveal that, despite the existence of a ­standardised and centralised ERP architecture, aligning this real-time transaction processing system with the reality of doing business is subject to constraints arising from both the business and virtual context of the firm. We explain the gradual and inevitable emergence of gaps between the inflexible ERP system and the decision support needs of managers. On the basis of the case studied, we conclude with a theoretical framework for the relationship between real-time transaction processing and decision support, differentiating between an information processing level and a decision process level.


Real-time decision support ERP Transaction processing Case study Middle managers Impact of information systems. 


  1. Adam, F. and J.C. Pomerol, “Developing Practical Support Tools Using Dashboards of Information,” in F. Burstein and C. Holsapple (Eds), Handbook on Decision Support Systems, International Handbook on Information Systems Series. London: Springer, 2008, 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. André, S. and B. Roy, “Conception et mise en place d’un outil d’évaluation de la performance environnementale: le cas des raffineries de la société Total,” Journal of Decision Systems, 16, 3, 2007, 335–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brézillon, P. and J.C. Pomerol, “Contextual Knowledge Sharing and Cooperation in Intelligent Assistant Systems,” Le Travail Humain, 62, 3, 1999, 223–246.Google Scholar
  4. Carton, F. and F. Adam, “Investigating the Impact of ERP In Collaborative Decision Making – A Case Study in Distribution,” in P. Zaraté et al. (Eds), Collaborative Decision Making: Perspectives and Challenges. Amsterdam: IOS, 2008, 295–307.Google Scholar
  5. Dechow, N. and J. Mouristen, “Enterprise Resource Planning Systems, Management Control and the Quest for Integration,” Accounting, Organizations & Society, 7, 8, October 2005, 691–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Earl, M.J. and A.G. Hopwood, “From Management Information to Information Management,” in H. Lucas, F. Land, T. Lincoln and K. Supper (Eds), The Information Systems Environment. North-Holland: International Federal for Information Processing (IFIP), 1980, 133–143.Google Scholar
  7. Mason, R., “Basic Concepts for Designing Management Information Systems,” AIS research paper #8, October 1969.Google Scholar
  8. Pinsonneault, A. and K.L. Kraemer, “The Impact of Information Technology on Middle Managers,” MIS Quarterly, 17, 3, September 1993, 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pinsonneault, A. and S. Rivard, “Information Technology and the Nature of Managerial Work: From the Productivity Paradox to the Icarus Paradox?” MIS Quarterly, 22, 3, September 1998, 287–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pomerol, J.C. and F. Adam, “Understanding Human Decision Making – A Fundamental Step Towards Effective Intelligent Decision Support,” in G. Wren (Ed.), Intelligent Decision Making: An AI Based Approach. London: Springer, 2008, 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fergal Carton
    • 1
    Email author
  • Frederic Adam
    • 1
  • Patrick Brézillon
    • 2
  1. 1.Business Information SystemsUniversity College CorkCorkIreland
  2. 2.Laboratoire d’Informatique de Paris 6Université Pierre et Marie CurieParisFrance

Personalised recommendations