The Enlightenment and Politics



The Enlightenment is a sort of political revolution in the broader sense of generalized Copernican cultural revolution or an intellectual movement with revolutionary and other relevant political, notably liberal-democratic, effects and legacies. In particular, these political outcomes comprise the French and American democratic revolutions usually considered, to a greater (the first) or lesser (the second) extent, what Pareto would call the “daughters” of the Enlightenment as their cultural foundation and prelude, specifically their intellectual rationale and herald. On account of its revolutionary influences and legacies, the Enlightenment turns out to be an indirect or “soft” (“velvet”) revolution in politics, notably democracy, as distinguished from direct or true (violent) political, including its own “daughters” the French and American, revolutions. At the minimum, the Enlightenment functions as the cultural functional equivalent or analog and proxy of modern political revolution, even if not as such in the strict sense. In Schumpeterian terms, it does so by virtue of originating as the project and functioning as the process of, like liberal modernity (Bauman 2001), “creative destruction” in politics through the cultural demolition of the old and the creation of new political structures.


Creative Destruction French Revolution Religious Freedom Modern Democracy American Revolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. ———. 2001. The Stars Down to Earth and Other Essays in the Irrational in Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Angel, Leonard. 1994. Enlightenment East and West. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  4. Archer, Robin. 2001. Secularism and Sectarianism in India and the West: What are the Real Lessons of American History? Economy and Society 30, 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arrow, Kenneth. 1950. A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare. Journal of Political Economy 58, 328–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Artz, Frederick. 1998 [1968]. The Enlightenment in France. Kent: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baldwin, Eric. 2006. The Devil Begins to Roar’: Opposition to Early Methodists in New England. Church History 75, 94–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bauman, Zygmunt. 1997. Postmodernity and its Discontents. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2000. Community. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2001. The Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. ——— (ed.) 2002. The Radical Right. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Bellamy, Richard. 1999. Liberalism and Pluralism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Berman, Morris. 2000. The Twilight of American Culture. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  14. Berry, Christopher. 1997. Social Theory of the Scottish Enlightenment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Biggart, Nicole and Richard Castanias. 2001. Collateralized Social Relations: The Social in Economic Calculation. American Journal of Economics & Sociology 60, 471–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blinkhorn, Martin. 2003. Fascists and Conservatives. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  17. Blomberg, Brock and Joseph Harrington. 2000. A Theory of Rigid Extremists and Flexible Moderates with an Application to the U.S. Congress. American Economic Review 90, 605–620.Google Scholar
  18. Borgers, Tilman. 2004. Costly Voting. American Economic Review 94, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ———. 1998. Acts of Resistance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Bremer, Francis. 1995. The Puritan Experiment. Hanover: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  21. Brink, Bert van den. 2000. The Tragedy of Liberalism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  22. Buchanan, James. 1991. The Economics and the Ethics of Constitutional Order. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  23. Buchanan, James and Gordon Tullock. 1962. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  24. Burns, Gene. 1990. The Politics of Ideology: The Papal Struggle with Liberalism. American Journal of Sociology 95, 1123–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Byrne, James. 1997. Religion and the Enlightenment. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  26. Cable, Sherry, Thomas Shriver and Tamara Mix. 2008. Risk Society and Contested Illness: The Case of Nuclear Weapons Workers. American Sociological Review 73, 380–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Champion, Justin. 1999. Willing to Suffer: Law and Religious Conscience in Seventeenth-Century England. In McLaren John and Coward Harold (eds.) Religious Conscience, the State, and the Law (pp. 13–28). Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  28. Clark, Elizabeth. 1999. Speech for the Soul: Religion, Conscience, and Free Speech in Antebellum America. In McLaren John and Harold Coward (eds.) Religious Conscience, the State, and the Law (pp. 62–76). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  29. Cochran, Augustus. 2001. Democracy Heading South. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  30. Cohen, Daniel. 2003. Our Modern Times. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Cole, Wade. 2005. Sovereignty Relinquished? Explaining Commitment to the International Human Rights Covenants, 1966–1999. American Sociological Review 70, 472–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Collins, Randall. 2000. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Precis. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30, 157–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. ———. 1979. Life Chances. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Davis, James. 2005. William Ames’s Calvinist Ambiguity Over Freedom of Conscience. Journal of Religious Ethics 33, 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dayton, Cornelia. 1999. Excommunicating the Governor’s Wife: Religious Dissent in the Puritan Colonies Before the Era of Rights Consciousness. In McLaren John and Harold Coward (eds.) Religious Conscience, the State, and the Law (pp. 29–45). Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  36. Delanty, Gerard. 2000. The Foundations of Social Theory: Origins and Trajectories. In Bryan Turner (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (pp. 21–46). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. Dombrowski, Daniel. 2001. Rawls and Religion. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  38. Dunn, Charles and David Woodard. 1996. The Conservative Tradition in America. Lanham: Rowan & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  39. Duverger, Maurice. 1972. De Janus. Paris: P.U.F.Google Scholar
  40. Eccleshall, Robert. 2002. The Doing of Conservatism. Journal of Political Ideologies 5, 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Edgell, Penny, Joseph Gerteis and Douglas Hartmann 2006. Atheists as Other: Moral Boundaries and Cultural Membership in American Society. American Sociological Review 71, 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Einolf, Christopher. 2007. The Fall and Rise of Torture: A Comparative and Historical Analysis. Sociological Theory 25, 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Eisenstadt, Shmuel. 1965. Transformation of Social Political, and Cultural Orders in Modernization. American Sociological Review 30, 659–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Evans, John and Michael Evans. 2008. Religion and Science: Beyond the Epistemological Conflict Narrative. Annual Review of Sociology 34, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fehler, Brian. 2005. Classicism and the Church: Nineteenth-Century Calvinism and the Rhetoric of Oratorical Culture. Rhetoric Review 24, 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Fitzpatrick, Martin. 1999. Enlightenment and Conscience. In McLaren John and Harold Coward (eds.) Religious Conscience, the State, and the Law (pp. 46–61). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  47. Foucault, Michel. 1996. What is Critique? In Schmidt James (ed.) What is Enlightenment? (pp. 382–398). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  48. Friedland, Roger. 2001. Religious Nationalism and the Problem of Collective Representation. Annual Review of Sociology 27, 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. ———. 2002. Money, Sex, and God: The Erotic Logic of Religious Nationalism. Sociological Theory 20, 381–425.Google Scholar
  50. Frijhoff, Willem. 2002. Religious Toleration in the United Provinces: From “Case” to “Model.” In Hsia Po-Chia and Henk van Nierop (eds.) Calvinism and Religious Toleration in the Dutch Golden Age (pp. 27–53). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Fromm, Erich. 1941. Escape from Freedom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  52. Fung, Archon. 2003. Associations and Democracy: Between Theories, Hopes, and Realities. Annual Review of Sociology 29, 515–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Garrard, Graeme. 2003. Rousseau’s Counter-Enlightenment. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  54. German, James. 1995. The Social Utility of Wicked Self-Love: Calvinism, Capitalism, and Public Policy in Revolutionary New England. Journal of American History 82, 965–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. ———. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  56. ———. 2000. The Third Way and its Critics. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  57. ———. 2000. The Mosaic Moment: An Early Modernist Critique of Modernist Theories of Nationalism. American Journal of Sociology 105, 1428–1468.Google Scholar
  58. ———. 2003. The Disciplinary Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  59. Gould, Philip. 1996. Covenant and Republic. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. ———. 1989a. The New Conservatism. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  61. ———. 2001. The Postnational Constellation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  62. Halliday, Terence and Pavel Osinsky. 2006. Globalization of Law. Annual Review of Sociology 32, 447–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Heller, Henry. 1986. The Conquest of Poverty. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  64. Heymann, Philip. 2003. Terrorism, Freedom, and Security. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  65. Hill, Steven. 2002. Fixing Elections. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Hinchman, Lewis. 1984. Hegel’s Critique of the Enlightenment. Gainesville: University Presses of Florida.Google Scholar
  67. Hirschman, Albert. 1977. The Passions and the Interests. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1999. Economics and Utopia. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Holton, R. J. 1987. The Idea of Crisis in Modern Society. British Journal of Sociology 38, 502–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hudson, Kenneth and Andrea Coukos. 2005. The Dark Side of the Protestant Ethic: A Comparative Analysis of Welfare Reform. Sociological Theory 23, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hull, Mary. 1999. Censorship in America. Boulder: NetLibrary.Google Scholar
  72. Inglehart, Ronald (ed.) 2004. Human Beliefs and Values. México: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  73. Inglehart, Ronald and Wayne Baker. 2000. Modernization, Cultural Change and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review 65, 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Jacobs, David, Jason Carmichael and Stephanie Kent. 2005. Vigilantism, Current Racial Threat, and Death Sentences. American Sociological Review 70, 656–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Jenness, Valerie. 2004. Explaining Criminalization: From Demography and Status Politics to Globalization and Modernization. Annual Review of Sociology 29, 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Juergensmeyer, Mark. 1994. The New Cold War? Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  77. ———. 2003. Terror in the Mind of God. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  78. Kaplan, Benjamin. 2002. “Dutch” Religious Tolerance: Celebration and Revision. In Hsia Po-Chia and Henk van Nierop (eds.) Calvinism and Religious Toleration in the Dutch Golden Age (pp. 8–27). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Kenshur, Oscar. 1993. Dilemmas of Enlightenment. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  80. Kloppenberg, James. 1998. The Virtues of Liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Langman, Lauren. 2005. From Virtual Public Spheres to Global Justice: A Critical Theory of Internetworked Social Movements. Sociological Theory 23, 42–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes and Andrei Shleifer. 2008. The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins. Journal of Economic Literature 46, 285–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. ———. 1999. The Might Have Been and Could be of Religion in Social Theory. Sociological Theory 17, 240–263.Google Scholar
  84. ———. 1994. Societal Taxonomies: Mapping the Social Universe. Annual Review of Sociology 20, 1–26.Google Scholar
  85. Lichterman, Paul. 2008. Religion and the Construction of Civic Identity. American Sociological Review 73, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lindsay, Michael. 2008. Evangelicals in the Power Elite: Elite Cohesion Advancing a Movement. American Sociological Review 73, 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Linton, Marisa. 2001. The Politics of Virtue in Enlightenment France. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  88. ———. 1996. American Exceptionalism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  89. Lipset, Seymour and Gary Marks. 2000. It Didn’t Happen Here. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  90. Mann, Michael. 1993. The Sources of Social Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. ———. 2005. The Dark Side of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  92. ———. 1986. Conservatism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  93. Mansbach, Richard. 2006. Calvinism as a Precedent for Islamic Radicalism. Brown Journal of World Affairs 12, 103–115.Google Scholar
  94. Mayway, Leon. 1984. In Defense of Modernity: Talcott Parsons and the Utilitarian Tradition. American Journal of Sociology 89, 1273–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. McLaren, John and Harold Coward (eds.) 1999. Religious Conscience, the State, and the Law. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  96. Means, Richard. 1966. Protestantism and Economic Institutions: Auxiliary Theories to Weber’s Protestant Ethic. Social Forces 44, 372–381.Google Scholar
  97. Merrill, Louis. 1945. The Puritan Policeman. American Sociological Review 10, 766–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Merton, Robert. 1939. Review of Ray Billington. The Protestant Crusade, 1800–1860. American Sociological Review 4, 436–438.Google Scholar
  99. ———. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  100. ———. 1995. The Thomas Theorem and the Matthew Effect. Social Forces 74, 379–422.Google Scholar
  101. Michels, Robert. 1968. Political Parties. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  102. Mises, Ludwig von. 1950. Socialism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  103. ———. 1957. Theory and History. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  104. Mokyr, Joel. 2009. Intellectual Property Rights, the Industrial Revolution, and the Beginnings of Modern Economic Growth. American Economic Review 99, 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Moore, Barrington. 1993. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  106. Mueller, Dennis (ed.) 1997. Perspectives on Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  107. ———. 2001. The Ethics of Modernity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  108. ———. 1966. The Sociological Tradition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  109. Nischan, Bodo. 1994. Prince, People, and Confession. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  110. ———. 1967a. The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  111. Patell, Cyrus. 2001. Negative Liberties. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  112. Phelps, Edmund. 2007. Macroeconomics for a Modern Economy. American Economic Review 97, 543–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Phillips, Kevin. 2006. American Theocracy. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  114. ———. 1973. The Open Society and its Enemies. Vol. 2. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  115. Samuelson, Paul. 1983. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  116. Schelling, Thomas. 2006. An Astonishing Sixty Years: The Legacy of Hiroshima. American Economic Review 96, 929–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Schmidt, James (ed.) (1996). What is Enlightenment?. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  118. Singh, Robert (ed.) 2002. American Politics and Society Today. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  119. Smelser, Neil. 1992. The Rational Choice Perspective: A Theoretical Assessment. Rationality and Society 4, 381–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. ———. 1997. Problematics of Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  121. Smith, Christian. 2000. Christian America? Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  122. Sorkin, David. 2005. Geneva’s Enlightened Orthodoxy: The Middle Way of Jacob Vernet (1698–1789). Church History 74, 286–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Symonds, Michael and Jason Pudsey. 2006. The Forms of Brotherly Love in Max Weber’s Sociology of Religion. Sociological Theory 24, 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Tilman, Rick. 2001. Ideology and Utopia in the Social Philosophy of the Libertarian Economists. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  125. Tiryakian, Edward. 2002. Review of Richard Munch. The Ethics of Modernity. American Journal of Sociology 107, 1629–1631.Google Scholar
  126. Turner, Bryan. 2002. Sovereignty and Emergency: Political Theology, Islam and American Conservatism. Theory, Culture & Society 19, 103–119.Google Scholar
  127. Wall, Steven. 1998. Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Walzer, Michael. 1963. Puritanism as a Revolutionary Ideology. History and Theory 3, 59–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Weisbrod, Carol. 1999. The Law and Reconstituted Christianity: The Case of the Mormons. In McLaren John and Harold Coward (eds.) Religious Conscience, the State, and the Law (pp. 136–153). Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  130. Young, Peyton. 1997. Group Choice and Individual Judgments. In Mueller Dennis (ed.) Perspectives on Public Choice (pp. 181–200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  131. Zaret, David. 1989. Religion and the Rise of Liberal-Democratic Ideology in 17th Century England. American Sociological Review 54, 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations