Methods and National Intellectual Capital Ranking of 40 Countries

Chapter

Abstract

As mentioned in the previous two chapters, the intellectual capital of a nation requires a comprehensive system of variables to help uncover and manage that nation’s invisible wealth; yet, measurement models of past studies have constraints for an on-going cross-country national intellectual capital (IC) comparison of a relatively large scale. This book proposes a moderate set of national intellectual capital indicators that is validated and can be easily replicated for follow-up trend analysis.

Keywords

Human Capital Market Capital Intellectual Capital Financial Capital Purchase Power Parity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Australia Department of Industry, Science and Resource Branch. 2000. Available at:http://www.innovation.gov.au/Documents/NEBTowardsKBEsummary.doc.
  2. Bontis, N. 2004c. National intellectual capital index: A United Nations initiative for the Arab region. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5(1): 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Commission of European Community. 2000. Available at: http://www.ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication1716_en.pdf.
  4. Malhotra, Y. 2000c. Knowledge assets in the global economy: Assessment of national intellectual capital. Journal of Global Information Management 8(3): 5–15.Google Scholar
  5. Malhotra, Y. 2002. Knowledge assets in the global economy: Assessment of national intellectual capital. In Advanced topics in global information management, ed. F. Tan, 329–345. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.Google Scholar
  6. Malhotra, Y. 2003. Managing and measuring knowledge assets in the public sector. Working paper, Syracuse University.Google Scholar
  7. OECD. 2000. International science and technology co-operation: Towards sustainable development. Proceedings of the OECD Seoul conference. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  8. Pomeda, J.R., C.M. Moreno, C.M. Rivera, and L.V. Martil. 2002. Towards an intellectual capital report of Madrid: New insights and developments. Presented at “The transparent enterprise. The value of intangibles”, Nov. 25–26, 2002, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  9. Singapore Department of Trade and Industry. 2001. Available at: http://app.mti.gov.sg/data/pages/507/doc/ERC_HUM_MainRepor.
  10. UK Department of Trade and Industry. 2000. Available at: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file11034.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationNational Chengchi UniversityTaipeiROC
  2. 2.Universal Networking Intellectual CapitalNorrtäljeSweden

Personalised recommendations