Advertisement

Background of National Intellectual Capital

  • Carol Yeh-Yun Lin
  • Leif Edvinsson
Chapter

Abstract

Intellectual capital, the source of the competencies and capabilities deemed ­essential for national economic growth, human development, and quality of life (Malhotra 2003), have been attracting an increasing amount of attention. Particularly, the results of national level intellectual capital studies and ranking provide a direction for nations to benchmark and to make wise decisions in the effective investment of national intangible assets and their development in the era of the knowledge economy. This chapter first describes the motivation for writing and publishing this book and the national intellectual capital models that are currently in use; this is followed by the obstacles that hinder the measurement of national intellectual capital, and then a presentation of the measurement framework proposed in this book.

Keywords

Intellectual Capital Intangible Asset Micro Model Accounting Firm Knowledge Asset 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Weziak, D. 2007. Measurement of national intellectual capital application to EU countries. http://www.ceps.lu/pdf/11/art1294.pdf.
  2. Andriessen, D. 2004. Making sense of intellectual capital. Burlington: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
  3. Bontis, N., N.C. Dragonetti, K. Jacobsen, and G. Roos. 1999. The knowledge toolbox: A review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources. European Management Journal 17: 391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bontis, N. 2001b. Assessing knowledge assets: A review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews 3(1): 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bontis, N. 2004b. National intellectual capital index: A United Nations initiative for the Arab region. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5(1): 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bounfour, A. 2003b. The IC-dVal approach. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(3): 396–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr, N.G. 2003a. IT doesn’t matter. Harvard Business Review 81(5): 41–49.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, J. 2001a. Level 5 leadership: The triumph of humility and fierce resolve. Harvard Business Review 79(1): 7–76.Google Scholar
  9. Edvinsson, L., and M. Malone. 1997b. Intellectual capital. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  10. Klein, P.A. 2000a. National statistics, portrait of the value floor. Journal of Economy Issues 34: 445–452.Google Scholar
  11. Malhotra, Y. 2000b. Knowledge assets in the global economy: Assessment of national intellectual capital. Journal of Global Information Management 8(3): 5–15.Google Scholar
  12. Malhotra, Y. 2003. Managing and measuring knowledge assets in the public sector. Working paper, Syracuse University.Google Scholar
  13. OECD. 2001a. The wellbeing of nations: The role of human and social capital. Center for educational research and innovation research paper. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  14. Pasher, and Shachar. 2007. The intellectual capital of the sate of Israel: 60 years of achievement. http://www.moital.gov.il/ic.
  15. Pasher, E. 1999a. The intellectual capital of the state of Israel. Herzlia Pituach: Kal.Google Scholar
  16. Petty, R., and J. Guthrie. 2000. Intellectual capital literature overview: Measurement, reporting and management. Journal of Intellectual Capital 1(2): 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pomeda, J.R., C.M. Moreno, C.M. Rivera, and L.V. Martil. 2002. Towards an intellectual capital report of Madrid: New insights and developments. Presented at “The transparent enterprise. The value of intangibles”, Nov. 25–26, 2002, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  18. Rembe, A. 1999. The governmental invest in Sweden Agency – ISA: Report 1999. Halls Offset AB, Stockholm. Available at: http://www.isa.se.
  19. Stähle, P., and Pöyhönene, A. 2005. Intellectual capital and national competitiveness: a critical examination. Case Finland. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference of Knowledge Management (ECKM), University of Limerick, Limerick.Google Scholar
  20. Sveiby, K.E. 2002. Methods for measuring intangible assets. Available at: http://www.sveiby.com/articles/IntangibleMethods.htm.
  21. United National Development Programme (UNDP). 2000. Survey of economic and social development in the ESCWA region 1999–2000. United National Development Programme Research Paper. New York, NY.Google Scholar
  22. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 2003. Status of and trends in the development of e-government. New York, NY.Google Scholar
  23. World Bank. 2001a. World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  24. World Bank. 2002. The knowledge assessment methodology and scoreboards. Available from http://www1.worldbank.org.
  25. Bontis, N., W. Chua, and S. Richardson. 2000a. Intellectual capital and the nature of business in Malaysia. Journal of Intellectual Capital 1(1): 58–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationNational Chengchi UniversityTaipeiROC
  2. 2.Universal Networking Intellectual CapitalNorrtäljeSweden

Personalised recommendations