Skip to main content

In Search of GE: Why We Have Not Documented a Gene–Social Environment Interaction Yet

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biosocial Foundations of Family Processes

Part of the book series: National Symposium on Family Issues ((NSFI))

Abstract

In this chapter, I argue that social science and genomics can be integrated – however, the way this marriage is currently occurring rests on spurious methods and assumptions and, as a result, will yield few lasting insights. Recent advances in both econometrics and developmental genomics provide scientists with a novel opportunity to understand how genes and (social) environment interact. Key to any causal inference about genetically heterogeneous effects of social conditions is that either genetics be exogenously manipulated while environment is held constant (and measured properly) and/or that environmental variation is exogenous in nature – i.e., experimental or arising from a natural experiment of sorts. Further, allele selection should be motivated by findings from genetic experiments in (model) animal studies linked to orthologous human genes. Likewise, genetic associations found in human population studies should then be tested through knock-out and overexpression studies in model organisms. Finally, epigenetic and gene expression analysis of corpse brains offers a potentially fruitful way to get at mechanisms by which social environment affects gene pathways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    However, a number of counter examples can be found where associational fishing expeditions have led to more tenuous findings that have not withstood the rigors of replication. One notable example can be found in the so-called “gay gene.” In 1993, Hamer et al. published an article in Science showing an association between a microsatellite on the X-chromosome (called Xq28) and homosexuality in men. The conclusion rested on the greater propensity of gay brothers to share genetic markers at this locus as well as pedigree analysis that showed a greater likelihood of gay men to have other gay male relatives on their maternal side (since the X that males receive always comes from their mother). Later work (see, Rice et al., 1999) failed to replicate the findings among a similar sample of Canadian brothers and a heated debate ensued. Hamer et al.’s study is among the better of the associational studies given its pedigree-based analysis, but like many others in the field it relies on a small, non-representative sample and purports to explain a complicated phenotype: stated sexual orientation. I underline “stated” for a reason: Even if the results could be routinely replicated, it may be the case that the Xq28 locus is associated with willingness to reveal homosexuality to survey takers rather than to homosexuality itself, given its sometimes stigmatizing status in North American culture.

References

  • Angrist, J. (1990). Lifetime earnings and the Vietnam era draft lottery: Evidence from social security administrative records. American Economic Review, 80(3), 313–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspi, A., et al. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297, 851–854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, D., & Glauber, R. (2006). Parental educational investment and children’s academic risk: Estimates of the impact of sibship size and birth order from exogenous variation in fertility, Journal of Human Resources, 41(4), 722–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, D., & Rauscher, E. (2010). Genetic Interactions with Prenatal Social Environment: Effects on Academic and Behavioral Outcomes. NBER Working Paper, W16026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, W., S. F. Lehrer, J. N. Rosenquist & Audrain-McGovern, J. (2009). “The Impact of Poor Health on Academic Performance: New Evidence Using Genetic Markers.” Journal of Health Economics, 28(3), 578–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., & Guo, G. (2011). Dopamine transporter genotype and freshman roommate assignment to a binge drinker. Research in progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, Arthur S. (1979). Heritability. Economica, 46(184): 327–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, G., & Stearns, E. (2002). The social influences on the realization of genetic potential for intellectual development. Social Forces, 80(3), 881–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer, D. H., Hu, S., Magnuson, V. L., Hu, N., & Pattatucci, A. M. (1993). Sexual orientation. Science, 261, 321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer, D. (2002). Rethinking Behavior Genetics. Science, 298(5591): 71–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Lawrence F., Jeffrey R. Kling, and Jeffrey B. Liebman. (2001). Moving to Opportunity in Boston: Early Results of a Randomized Mobility Experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics CXVI: 607–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowler, W. C., Williams, R. C., Pettit, D. J., & Steinberg, A. G. (1988). GM3;5,13,14 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus: An association in American Indians with genetic admixture. American Journal of Human Genetics, 43, 520–526.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, David S. (2008). Randomized Experiments from Non-random Selection in U.S. House Elections. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 675–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lleras-Muney, Adriana. (2005). The Relationship Between Education and Adult Mortality in the U.S. Review of Economic Studies, 72(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, P. O., Sasaki, A., Huang, T. C. T., Unterberger, A., Suderman, M., Ernst, C., Meany, M. J., Turecki, G., & Szyf, M. (2008). Promoter-wide hypermethylation of the ribsomomal RNA gene promoter in the suicide brain. PLoS One, 3(5), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, G., Anderson, C., Risch, N., & Ebers, G. (1999). Male homosexuality: Absence of linkage to microsatellite markers at Xq28. Science, 284, 665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, J.L., D.C. Rowe, & Buster, M. (1999). Nature, Nurture and First Sexual Intercourse in the USA: Fitting Behavioural Genetic Models to NLSY Kinship Data. Journal of Biosocial Science, 31, 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D.C., & Teachman, J. (2001). Behavioral genetic research designs and social policy studies. In A. Thornton (Ed.), The well-being of children and families: Research and data needs. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press: 157–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacerdote, Bruce. (2004). What Happens When We Randomly Assign Children to Families? NBER Working Paper No. 10894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, K. R., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). Controlling the false-positive rate in multilocus genome scans for selection. Genetics, 175, 737–750.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Klaauw, W. (2002). Estimating the effect of financial aid offers on college enrollment: A regression-discontinuity approach. International Economic Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver IC, Cervoni N, Champagne FA, D’Alessio AC, Sharma S, Seckl JR, Dymov S, Szyf M, & Meaney MJ. (2004). Epigeneitc programming by maternal behavior. Nat Neurosci. 7(8), 847–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalton Conley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Conley, D. (2011). In Search of GE: Why We Have Not Documented a Gene–Social Environment Interaction Yet. In: Booth, A., McHale, S., Landale, N. (eds) Biosocial Foundations of Family Processes. National Symposium on Family Issues. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7361-0_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics