Advertisement

Implementation of Acoustic Dosimeters With Recoverable Month-Long GPS/TDR Tags to Interpret Controlled-Exposure Experiments for Large Whales

  • Bruce R. MateEmail author
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 730)

Abstract

Obtaining extended and detailed information from instrumented whales is important for understanding whale behavior and interpreting responses to anthropogenic noise but has been difficult to achieve with tags because of short attachment times, poor spatial/temporal resolution, or lack of adequate acoustic data. In 2007–2008, sperm whales were tagged in the Gulf of California with Wildlife Computers TDR-PAT-MK-10 tags. While attached, the tags sent Fastloc-GPS locations and summary dive data (shape, duration, and depth) via ARGOS after dives >10 min and >10 m. Tags released from the whales floated to the surface and were recovered. Downloaded data revealed high-resolution time-depth recorder (TDR; 1-s and 2-m dive-depth increments) and GPS data within 60 m (Mate 2008). The tags provided insights into resting, foraging, and traveling behaviors, diving to depths over 1,200 m for periods of up to 28 days. Fast zigzag patterns during dives likely represented foraging attempts on Humboldt squids. Despite coordinated travels, whales in the same social unit did not usually dive synchronously or to the same depth and displayed considerable variability at the same position and time.

Keywords

Noise Exposure Acoustic Event Sperm Whale Dive Behavior Geographic Information System Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bailey H, Mate BR, Palacios DM, Irvine L, Bograd SJ, Costa DP (2010) Behavioural estimation of blue whale movements in the Northeast Pacific from state-space model analysis of satellite tracks. Endang Species Res 10:93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berman-Kowalewski M, Gulland F, Wilkin S, Calambokidis J, Mate BR, Cordaro J, Rotstein D, St. Leger J, Collins P, Fahy K, Dover S (2010) Association between blue whale mortality and ship strikes along the California coast. Aquat Mamm 36:59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cotte C, Guinet C, Taupeir-Letage I, Mate B, Petiau E (2009) Scale-dependent habitat use by a large free-ranging predator, the Mediterranean fin whale. Deep-Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap 56:801–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mate BR (2008) Technical instrumentation issues related to the design and execution of a controlled-exposure experiment for larger cetaceans to assess possible behavioural responses and potential impacts. Bioacoustics 17:334–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mate B, Mesecar R, Lagerquist B (2007) The evolution of satellite-monitored radio tags for large whales: One laboratory’s experience. Deep-Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr 54:224–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine Mammal Institute, Department of Fisheries and WildlifeOregon State UniversityNewportUSA

Personalised recommendations