Advertisement

Pathways to Better Water Quality

  • Lois Wright MortonEmail author
  • Susan S. Brown
Chapter

Abstract

Nonpoint source pollutants are the number one cause of impaired waters in the United States. In many regions, agriculture contributes excessive nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment to creeks, rivers and lakes creating unintended and severe negative consequences to our water bodies. Solutions to nonpoint source agricultural pollution must reach beyond ecological science and technical intervention to engage citizens and activate the public will to invest personal and public resources. In this introduction, we offer an overview of the theoretical pathways and scientific evidence chapters that follow.

Keywords

Watershed Management Total Maximum Daily Load Public Sociology Citizen Involvement Watershed Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Busch, L., W. B. Lacy, J. Buirkhardt, D. Hemken, J. Moraga-Rojel, T. Koponen, and J. de Souza Silva. 1995. Making Nature Shaping Culture. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  2. The Quality of Our Nation’s Water. http://www.epa.gov/305b/.
  3. http://www.epa.gov/305b; Sabatier, Paul A., W. Focht, M. Lubell, Z. Trachtenberg, A. Vedlitz, and M. Matlock (eds). 2005. Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management. Cambridge: The MIT Press; Morton, Lois Wright and Steven Padgitt. 2005. “Selecting Socio-Economic Metrics for Watershed Management.” Environmental Monitoring & Assessment 103:83–98; Morton, Lois Wright and Chih Yuan Weng. 2009. “Getting to Better Water Quality Outcomes: The Promise & Challenge of the Citizen Effect.” Agriculture and Human Values 26(1):83–94.Google Scholar
  4. Fischer, F. 1993; 2005. Citizens, Experts and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham: Duke University Press; Dietz, Thomas and Paul C. Sterns (eds). 2008. Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. National Research Council of the National Academies. Washington: The National Academies Press http://www.nap.edu
  5. National Water Quality Inventory Report to Congress, http://www.epa.gov/305b
  6. Alexander, Richard B., Richard A. Smith, Gregory E. Schwarz, Elizabeth W. Boyer, Jacqueline V. Nolan and John W. Brakebill. 2008. “Differences in Phosphorus and Nitrogen Delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin.” Environmental Science & Technology 42(3):822–830. Google Scholar
  7. USDA Natural Resource Inventory; USDA Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  8. Heinz Center. 2008. The State of the Nation’s Ecosystems 2008: Measuring the Lands, Waters, and Living Resources of the United States. The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economy, and the Environment. Washington: Island Press. Google Scholar
  9. Beierle, T. C. and J. Cayford. 2002. Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions, p. 3. Washington: Resources for the Future. Google Scholar
  10. Almond, G. and S. Verba. 1989. The Civic Culture Revisited. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; Putnam, R. D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  11. Morton, L. Wright. 2003. “Civic Structure.” pp. 179–182 in Encyclopedia of Community: From the Village to the Virtual World edited by Karen Christensen and David Levinson, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
  12. Weber, E. P. 2000. “A New Vanguard for the Environment: Grass-roots Ecosystem Management as a New Environmental Movement”. Society & Natural Resources 13:237.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations