Abstract
Respiratory illnesses are commonly treated with drugs delivered to the lungs as an inhaled aerosol. The inhaled aerosol route sometimes offers advantages over other routes such as injection or oral delivery. These advantages include rapid and predictable onset of action of drug, decreased adverse reactions, as well as safe and convenient delivery. However, the design of a device and formulation for reliable delivery of a pharmaceutical compound as an inhaled aerosol is more difficult than most other delivery routes. This is because of the need to transform the active ingredient into an aerosol having particle sizes of a few micrometers in diameter that is then supplied to the patient’s mouth upon inhalation. Devices that can create sprays with particles in the micrometer size range, but which remain portable, inexpensive to manufacture, easy to use by patients, and are robust enough to withstand patient use, are relatively few in design. Indeed, at present only four basic spray production mechanisms are currently in use on the clinical market for drug delivery to the lungs: pressurized release of a volatile propellant, colliding liquid jets, air-blast atomization and high frequency vibration methods. While other methods have undergone development (e.g., Rayleigh breakup of an extruded liquid jet [1]; high voltage electrosprays [2]), they have not yet reached market release. In the following we consider the four clinically available methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ward, M. E., Woodhouse, A., Mather, L. E., Farr, S. J., Okikawa, J. K., Lloyd, P., Schuster, J. A., and Rubsamen, R. M. 1997. Morphine pharmacokinetics after pulmonary administration from a novel aerosol delivery system, Clin. Pharm. Ther. 62:596–609.
Meesters, G. M. H., Vercoulen, P. H. W., Marijnissen, J. C. M., and Scarlett, B. 1992. Generation of micron-sized droplets from the Taylor cone, J. Aerosol Sci. 23:37–49.
Finlay, W. H. 2001. Mechanics of Inhaled Pharmaceutical Aerosols: An Introduction. Academic. London
Versteeg, H. K., Hargrave, G. K., and Kirby, M. 2006. Internal flow and near-orifice spray visualisation of a model pharmaceutical pressurized metered dose inhaler, J. Phys. (Conf. Ser.) 45:207–213.
Crosland, B. M., Johnson, M. R. J., and Matida, E. A. 2009. Characterization of the spray velocities from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler, J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. Drug. Del. 22:85097.
Dunbar, C. A., Watkins, A. P., and Miller, J. F. 1997. An experimental investigation of the spray issued from a pMDI using laser diagnostic techniques, J. Aerosol Med. 10:351–268.
Clark, A. R. 1996. MDIs: physics of aerosol formation, J. Aerosol Med. 9S:19–26.
Kleinstreuer, C., Shi, H., and Zhang, Z. 2006. Computational analyses of a pressurized metered dose inhaler and a new drug-aerosol targeting methodology, J. Aerosol Med. 20:294–309.
Martin, A. R. and Finlay, W. H. The effect of humidity on particle sizing from metered-dose inhalers, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 39:283–289, 2005.
Domnick, J. and Durst, F. 1995. Measurement of bubble size, velocity and concentration in flashing flow behind a sudden constriction, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 21:1047–1062.
Dunbar, C. A., Watkins, A. P., and Miller, J. F. 1997. Theoretical investigation of the spray from a metered-dose inhaler. Atom. Sprays 7:417–436.
Zierenberg, B., Eicher, J., Dunne, S., and Freund, B. 1996. Boehringer Ingelheim nebulizer BINEB a new approach to inhalation therapy. In R. N. Dalby, P. R. Byron, and S. J. Farr, eds., Proceedings of Respiratory Drug Delivery V. Interpharm Press, Buffalo Grove, pp. 187–193.
Bartels, F., Bachtler, W., Dunne, S. T., Eicher, J., Freund, B., Hart, W. B., and Lessmoellmann, C. 1999. Atomizing nozzle and filter and spray generating device, US Patent 6007676.
Jaeger, J., Cirillo, P., Eicher, J., Geser, J., Freund, B., and Zierenberg, B. 2005. Device for producing high pressure in a fluid in miniature, US patent 69185467.
Zierenberg, B. 1999. Optimizing the in vitro performance of Respimat, J. Aerosol Med. 12:S19–S24.
Mercer, T. T., Tillery, M. I., and Chow, H. Y. 1968. Operating characteristics of some compressed-air nebulizers, Am. Ind. Hyg. J. 29:66–78.
Dessanges, J.-F. 2001. A history of nebulization, J. Aerosol Med. 14:65–71.
Niven, R. W., Speer, M., Schreier, H. 1991. Nebulization of liposomes II. The effects of size and modelling of solute release profiles, Pharm. Res. 8:217–221.
Lentz, Y. K., Worden, L. R., Anchordoquy, T. J., and Lengsfeld, C. S. 2005. Effect of jet nebulization on DNA: identifying the dominant degradation mechanism and mitigation methods, J. Aerosol Sci. 36:973–990.
Finlay, W. H., Lange, C. F., King, M., and Speert, D. 2000. Lung delivery of aerosolized dextran, Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care Med. 161:91–97.
Finlay, W. H., Stapleton, K. W., and Zuberbuhler, P. 1998. Variations in predicted regional lung deposition of salbutamol sulphate between 19 nebulizer models, J. Aerosol Med. 11:65–80.
Topp, M. 1973. Ultrasonic atomization – a photographic study of the mechanism of disintegration, J. Aerosol Sci. 4:17–25.
Cipolla, D. C., Clark, A. R., Chan, H. K., Gonda, I., and Shire, S. J. 1994. Assessment of aerosol delivery systems for recombinant human deoxyribonuclease, STP Pharm. Sci. 4:50–62.
Nikander, K., Turpeinen, M., and Wollmer, P. 1999. The conventional ultrasonic nebulizer proved inefficient in nebulizing a suspension, J. Aerosol Med. 12:47–53.
Ghazanfari, T., Elhissi, A. M. A., Ding, Z., and Taylor, K. M. G. 2007. The influence of fluid physicochemical properties on vibrating-mesh nebulization, Int. J. Pharm. 339:103–111.
Knoch, M. and Finlay, W. H. 2008. Nebulizer technologies. In Modified-Release Drug Delivery Technology, 2nd edn., ed. M. J. Rathbone, Marcel Dekker, pp. 613–622, Chap. 45.
Lass, J. S., Sant, A., and Knoch, M. 2006. New advances in aerosolised drug delivery: vibrating membrane nebuliser technology, Exp. Op. Drug Del. 3:693–702.
Zhang, G., Anand, D., and Wiedmann, T. S. 2007. Performance of the vibrating membrane aerosol generation device: aeroneb micropump nebulizer, J. Aerosol Med. 20:408–416.
Knoch, M. and Keller, M. 2005. The customised electronic nebuliser: a new category of liquid aerosol drug delivery systems, Exp. Op. Drug Del. 2:377–390.
Elhissi, A. M. A., Faizi, M., Naji, W. F., Gill, H. S., and Taylor, K. M. G. 2007. Physical stability and aerosol properties of liposomes delivered using an air-jet nebulizer and a novel micropump device with large mesh apertures, Int. J. Pharm. 334:62–70.
Rottier, B. L., van Erp, C. J. P., Sluyter, T. S., Heijerman, H. G. M., Frijlink, H. W. F., and de Boer, A. H. 2009. Changes in performance of the Pari eFlow® rapid and Pari LC Plus™ during 6 months use by CF patients, J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. Drug Del., ahead of print. doi:10.1089/jamp.2008.0712.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer US
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Finlay, W.H. (2011). Pharmaceutical Aerosol Sprays for Drug Delivery to the Lungs. In: Ashgriz, N. (eds) Handbook of Atomization and Sprays. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7264-4_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7264-4_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7263-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7264-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)