Physical and Geometrical Motivation

  • Gregory L. Naber
Part of the Texts in Applied Mathematics book series (TAM, volume 25)


It sometimes transpires that mathematics and physics, pursuing quite different agendas, find that their intellectual wanderings have converged upon the same fundamental idea and that, once it is recognized that this has occurred, each breathes new life into the other. The classic example is the symbiosis between General Relativity and amply attest, the results of such an interaction can be spectacular. The story we have to tell is of another such confluence of ideas, more recent and perhaps even more profound. Our purpose in this preliminary chapter is to trace the physical and geometrical origins of the notion of a “gauge field” (known to mathematicians as a “connection on a principal bundle”). We will not be much concerned yet with rigorously defining the terms we use, nor will we bother to prove most of our assertions. Indeed, much of the remainder of the book is devoted to these very tasks. We hope only to offer something in the way of motivation.


Vector Potential Stereographic Projection Principal Bundle Magnetic Monopole Solid Torus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. N2.
    Naber, G.L., Spacetime and Singularities, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1988.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Dir1.
    Dirac, P.A.M., “Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field”, Proc. Roy. Soc., A133(1931), 60–72.Google Scholar
  3. Dir2.
    Dirac, P.A.M., “The theory of magnetic poles”, Phys. Rev., 74(1948), 817–830.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. AB.
    Aharonov, Y. and D. Bohm, “Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory”, Phys. Rev., 115(1959), 485–491.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hopf.
    Hopf, H., “Über die abbildungen der 3-sphere auf die kugelfläache”, Math. Annalen, 104(1931), 637–665.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehr.
    Ehresmann, C., “Les connexions infinitésimales dans un espace fibré différentiable”, in Colloque de Topologie, Bruxelles (1950), 29–55, Masson, Paris, 1951.Google Scholar
  7. YM.
    Yang, C.N. and R.L. Mills, “Conservation of isotopic spin and isotopic gauge invariance”, Phys. Rev., 96(1954), 191–195.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Don.
    Donaldson, S.K., “An application of gauge theory to four dimensional topology”, J. Diff. Geo., 18(1983), 279–315.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. BPST.
    Belavin, A., A. Polyakov, A. Schwartz and Y. Tyupkin, “Pseudoparticle solutions of the Yang-Mills equations”, Phys. Lett., 59B(1975), 85–87.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Uhl.
    Uhlenbeck, K., “Removable singularities in Yang-Mills fields”, Comm. Math. Phys., 83(1982), 11–30.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. AHS.
    Atiyah, M.F., N.J. Hitchin and I.M. Singer, “Self duality in four dimensional Riemannian geometry”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., A362(1978), 425–461.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory L. Naber
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations