Advertisement

Future Directions

  • John Rombeau
  • Amy Goldberg
  • Catherine Loveland-Jones
Chapter

Abstract

Multiple forces are catalyzing change in the traditional model of surgical mentoring. Surgical mentoring will increasingly occur during simulation sessions. Telementoring will be used for surgical mentoring over long distances. Personal computers will provide a 24-7 virtual surgical university. Mentees will have multiple mentors, each with a specific role. Assessment of technical skill will become more objective, allowing for competency-based training.

Keywords

Operating Room Virtual Reality Technical Skill Surgical Training Deliberate Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Bridges M, Diamond D (1999) The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room. Am J Surg 177:28–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gaba DM (2004) The future vision of simulation in healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care 13(Suppl 1):i2–i10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gaba DM, DeAnda A (1988) A comprehensive anesthesia simulation environment: re-creating the operating room for research and training. Anesthesiology 69:387–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kapadia MR, DaRosa DA, MacRae HM, Dunnington GL (2007) Current assessment and future directions of surgical skills laboratories. J Surg Educ 64:260–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A et al (2006) Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 243:291–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sturm LP, Windsor JA, Cosman PH, Cregan P, Hewett PJ, Maddern GJ (2008) A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training. Ann Surg 248:166–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cundiff GW (1997) Analysis of the effectiveness of an endoscopy education program in improving residents’ laparoscopic skills. Obstet Gynecol 90:854–859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J et al (2009) Use of simulation-based education to reduce catheter-related bloodstream infections. Arch Int Med 169:1420–1423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ericcson KA (2005) Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 79(Suppl 10):S70–S81Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee JT, Qiu M, Teshome M et al (2009) The utility of endovascular simulation to improve technical performance and stimulate continued interest of preclinical medical students in vascular surgery. J Surg Educ 66:367–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leach DC (2005) Simulation: it’s about respect. ACGME Bull Dec:2–3Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jensen AR, Milner R, Achildi O et al (2008) Effective instruction of vascular anastomosis in the surgical skills laboratory. Am J Surg 195:189–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hassan I, Maschuw K, Rothmund M et al (2006) Novices in surgery are the target group of a virtual reality training laboratory. Eur Surg Res 38:109–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anastakis DJ, Regehr G, Reznick RK et al (1999) Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model. Am J Surg 177:167–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dubrowski A, MacRae H (2006) Randomized, controlled study investigating the optimal instructor:student ratios for teaching suturing skills. Med Educ 40:59–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Metalis S (1985) Effects of massed versus distributed practice on acquisition of video game skill. Percept Motor Skills 61:457–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rogers DA, Regehr G, Yeh KA et al (1998) Computer-assisted learning versus a lecture and feedback seminar for teaching a basic surgical technical skill. Am J Surg 175:508–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jensen AR, Wright AS, Levy A et al (2009) Acquiring basic surgical skills: is a faculty mentor really needed? Am J Surg 197:82–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jensen AR, Milner R, Gaughan J et al (2005) An inexpensive ex-vivo porcine laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication training model. JSLS 9:322–327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC et al (2010) Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room – a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 199:115–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Satava RM (1993) Virtual reality surgical simulator: the first steps. Surg Endosc 7:203–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seymour N, Gallagher AG, Roman SA et al (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236:458–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aggarwal R, Ward J, Balasundaram I et al (2007) Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 246:771–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hamilton EC, Scott DJ, Fleming JB et al (2002) Comparison of a video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 16:406–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K et al (2004) Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surg Endosc 18:485–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Haque S, Srinivasan S (2006) A meta-analysis of the training effectiveness of virtual reality simulators. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 10:51–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sedlack RE, Kolars JC (2004) Computer simulator training enhances the competency of gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy: results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 99:33–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Challacombe B, Kavoussi L, Patriciu A et al (2006) Technology insight: telementoring and telesurgery in urology. Nat Clin Pract Urol 3:611–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Allen D, Bowersox J, Jones GG (1997) Current status of telesurgery. Telemedicine Today [serial online] June 1997Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rosser JC, Wood M, Payne JH et al (1997) Telementoring: a practical option in surgical training. Surg Endosc 11:852–855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Panait L, Rafiq A, Tomulescu V et al (2006) Telementoring versus on-site mentoring in virtual reality-based surgical training. Surg Endosc 20:113–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sebajang H, Trudeau P, Dougall A et al (2006) The role of telementoring and telerobotic assistance in the provision of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in rural areas. Surg Endosc 20:1389–1393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Anvari M (2007) Telesurgery: remote knowledge translation in clinical surgery. World J Surg 31:1545–1550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schlachta CM, Kenta SA, Lefebvre KL et al (2008) A model for longitudinal mentoring and telementoring of laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1634–1638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Morahan PS, Richman RC (2001) Career obstacles for women in medicine. Med Educ 35:97–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Singletary SE (2005) Society of Surgical Oncology. Presidential address: mentoring surgeons for the 21st century. Ann Surg Oncol 12:848–860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fried GM, Feldman LS (2008) Objective assessment of technical performance. World J Surg 32:156–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R et al (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84:273–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Larson JL, Williams RG, Ketchum J et al (2005) Feasibility, reliability and validity of an operative performance rating system for evaluating surgery residents. Surgery 138:640–647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wohaibi EM, Earle DB, Ansanitis FE et al (2007) A new web-based operative skills assessment tool effectively tracks progression in surgical resident performance. J Surg Educ 64:333–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chang L, Satava RM, Pellegrini CA et al (2003) Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurements of skill. Surg Endosc 17:1744–1748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Moorthy K et al (2007) An evaluation of the feasibility, validity, and reliability of laparoscopic skills assessment in the operating room. Ann Surg 245:992–999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Rombeau
    • 1
  • Amy Goldberg
    • 1
  • Catherine Loveland-Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryTemple University HospitalPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations