Abstract
Time to change tack. Theology cannot be dodged forever despite William James’ hopes. In the present case, I found one issue unavoidable and requiring discussion even if from a less systematically historical angle than the others, namely Theism. The existence or otherwise of God might, at first glance, strike one as an exclusively theological or philosophical issue rather than a Psychological one. Psychology surely only enters into the picture when we ask the rather different question as to the psychological reasons why people believe in God, the default assumption from an orthodox scientific view being that it is belief, rather than disbelief, which needs explaining. (Not a position which has always been held, atheism once being thought a form of insanity and, as we saw in Chap. 3, belief in God being thought by mental and moral philosophers to be the ‘normal’ outcome of healthy maturation.)
I leave aside in the chapter the most sophisticated version (or versions) of something like the Theism argument: the case proposed by some physicists that the universe is governed by an ‘anthropic principle’ which ensures both the emergence of humans and its comprehensibility by them. This is an awfully crude summary however. For those wishing to pursue the topic, J. D. Barrow and F. J. Tipler (1986) remains the most thorough review of the topic by an eminent physicist and an equally eminent astronomer. It gets very technical in places. Notably it largely leaves religious questions aside, though has some interesting discussion of the ontological argument for the existence of God.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
At least one mid-twentieth century work appeared adopting this position and casting unbelief as the problem rather than belief: H. C. Rümke (1952, from Dutch of 1949) The Psychology of Unbelief.
- 2.
One core problem is the meaning of ‘design’ and the criteria we use for ascribing it. Complexity as such is quite patently not a criterion (nobody denies that toothpicks are designed, but they are about as simple as it gets). The legitimate inference from finding a watch is not to a ‘designer’ but to the existence of an advanced technological culture. I could go on but will resist the temptation.
- 3.
At the very end of the final chapter, I have attempted to formulate my own position on the ‘God’ question.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Richards, G. (2011). The Theism Question. In: Psychology, Religion, and the Nature of the Soul. Library of the History of Psychological Theories. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7173-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7173-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7172-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7173-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)