Advertisement

Social Network Analysis: History, Concepts, and Research

  • Mingxin Zhang
Chapter

Abstract

Social network analysis (SNA), in essence, is not a formal theory in social science, but rather an approach for investigating social structures, which is why SNA is often referred to as structural analysis [1]. The most important difference between social network analysis and the traditional or classic social research approach is that the contexts of the social actor, or the relationships between actors are the first considerations of the former, while the latter focuses on individual properties. A social network is a group of collaborating, and/or competing individuals or entities that are related to each other. It may be presented as a graph, or a multi-graph; each participant in the collaboration or competition is called an actor and depicted as a node in the graph theory. Valued relations between actors are depicted as links, or ties, either directed or undirected, between the corresponding nodes. Actors can be persons, organizations, or groups – any set of related entities. As such, SNA may be used on different levels, ranging from individuals, web pages, families, small groups, to large organizations, parties, and even to nations.

Keywords

Social Network Social Capital Network Data Social Network Analysis Network Member 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    B. Wellman and S. D. Berkowitz (Eds). “Social Structures: A Network Approach.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. C. Freeman. “What is Social Network Analysis?” Last Update Friday, 08-Feb-2008, Available at: http://www.insna.org/sna/what.html
  3. 3.
    S. Wasserman and K. Faust. “Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. A. Boorman and H. C. White. “Social Structure from Multiple Networks. II. Role Structures.” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 81, No. 6, 1976, pp. 1384–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. J. Watts. “Networks, Dynamics, and the Small-World Phenomenon.” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 105, No. 2, 1999, pp. 493–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. J. H. Zhu. “Opportunities and Challenges for Network Analysis of Social and Behavioral Data.” Seminar Series on Chaos, Control and Complex Networks City University of Hong Kong, Poly U University of Hong Kong & IEEE Hong Kong R&A/CS Joint Chapter, 2007.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. D. White, B. Wellman, and N. Nazer. “Does Citation Reflect Social Structure? Longitudinal Evidence from the ‘Globenet’ Interdisciplinary Research Group.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2004, pp. 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. C. Freeman. “The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in The Sociology of Science.” Canada: Empirical Press Vancouver, 2004.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Wetherell, A. Plakans, and B. Wellman. “Social Networks, Kinship, and Community in Eastern Europe.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1994, pp. 639–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Hawe, C. Webster, and A. Shiell. “A Glossary of Terms for Navigating the Field of Social Network Analysis.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Vol. 58, 2004, pp. 971–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Granovetter. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, 1973, pp. 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. X. Zhang. “Co-citation Network and the Structure of Paradigms in the Research Field of Media Economics: 1999–2008.” Unpublished manuscript, 2011.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Simmel. “On Individuality and Social Forms.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1908/1971.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Scott. “Social Network Analysis: A Handbook.” London: Sage Publications, 1987.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Granovetter. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embedded-ness.” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3, 1985, pp. 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Plickert, R. Côté, and B. Wellman. “It’s Not Who You Know. It’s How You Know Them: Who Exchanges What with Whom?” Social Networks, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2007, pp. 405–429.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Liu. “An Introduction to Social Network Analysis (In Chinese).” Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. X. Zhang. “Exploring Adolescent Peer Relationships Online and Offline: An Empirical and Social Network Analysis.” Proceedings of 2009 WRI International Conference on Communications and Mobile Computing, Vol. 3, 2009, pp. 268–272.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. Wellman. “The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers.” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 84, 1979, pp. 1201–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Marin and B. Wellman. “Social Network Analysis: An Introduction.” In: P. Carrington and J. Scott (Eds). Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: Sage, 2010.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. Gibson. “Concurrency and Commitment: Network Scheduling and Its Consequences for Diffusion.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2005, pp. 295–323.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    R. Gould. “Insurgent Identities: Class, Community and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    L. Wei and M. X. Zhang. “The Adoption and Use of Mobile Phone in Rural China: A Case Study of Hubei, China.” Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2008, pp. 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Wei and M. X. Zhang. “The Impacts of Internet Knowledge on College Students’ Intention to Continue to Use the Internet.” Information Research, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2008, paper 348. Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/13--3/paper348.html
  25. 25.
    J. J. H. Zhu and Z. He. “Perceived Characteristics, Perceived Needs, and Perceived Popularity: Adoption and Use of the Internet in China.” Communication Research, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2002, pp. 466–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Y. J. Bian. “Bringing Strong Ties Back in: Indirect Ties, Network Bridges, and Job Searches in China.” American Sociological Review, Vol. 62, No. 3, 1997, pp. 366–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    N. Lin, K. Cook, and R. Burt (Eds). “Social Capital: Theory and Research.” New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    N. Lin. “Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action.” NewYork: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    S. Borgatti, M. Everett, and L. Freeman. “Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis.” Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies, 2002.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    R. Hanneman. “Introduction to Social Network Methods.” 2002, Available at: www.faculty.ucr.edu/,hanneman/
  31. 31.
    R. Mickenberg and J. Dugan. “Taxi Driver Wisdom.” San Francisco: Chronicle, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Journalism and CommunicationWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations