Ensuring that Reproductive Laboratories Provide High-Quality Services
Several tests and procedures under reproductive laboratory (RL) scope of activities are complex and not easy to standardize. As a consequence, results can vary widely within and between laboratories which may ultimately impact on health-care decisions and treatment outcome. In order to ensure that results are accurate, precise, and reproducible, and that results from one laboratory can be compared with those provided by others, every RL, regardless of its location, complexity, and size, should implement a quality management (QM) program as a solution for the lack of standardization of actions and procedures.
KeywordsProficiency Testing Sperm Retrieval Antisperm Antibody Reproductive Laboratory Quality Management Program
- 1.Athayde K, Varghese A, Agarwal A. Quality management of the andrology laboratory. In: Rao K, Agarwal A, Srinivas MS, editors. Andrology laboratory manual. 1st ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Pvt Ltd.; 2010. p. 165–72.Google Scholar
- 2.College of American Pathologists. Standards for reproductive laboratories Accreditation, 2009 edition. http://www.cap.org/apps/docs/laboratory_accreditation/build/pdf/standards_repro.pdf. Accessed 20 Sep 2011.
- 3.Commission of the European Parliament (2004). Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32004L0023:EN:NOT. Accessed 14 Feb 2012.
- 4.Ministry of Health. Brazilian National Agency for Sanitary Survaillance (2006). Resolução no. 33 da Diretoria Colegiada da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (amended by RDC23 of 27 May 2011 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells). http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/anvisa/2011/res0023_27_05_2011.html. Accessed 14 Feb 2012.
- 8.World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen: quality assurance. 5th ed. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2010. p. 179–202.Google Scholar
- 9.Boone WR, Higdon III L, Johnson JE. Quality management issues in the assisted reproduction laboratory. J Reprod Stem Cell Biotechnol. 2010;1:30–107.Google Scholar
- 10.College of American Pathologists. Reproductive laboratory checklist, 2007 edition. http://www.cap.org/apps/docs/laboratory_accreditation/checklists/reproductive_laboratory_sep07.pdf. Accessed 6 March 2012.
- 12.American Association of Bioanalysts: proficiency testing services. http://www.aab-pts.org. Accessed 27 Jan 2012.
- 13.European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology. Special Interest Group in Andrology: External quality control. http://www.eshre.eu/ESHRE/English/Specialty-Groups/SIG/Andrology/External-Quality-Control/page.aspx/104. Accessed 27 Jan 2012.
- 15.Esteves SC, Couto M. Classificação ISO 5 em laboratório de fertilização in vitro. Rev Soc Bras Contr Contam. 2005;20:8–10.Google Scholar
- 16.Esteves SC, Verza Jr S, Gomes AP. Comparison between international standard organization (ISO) type 5 and type 6 cleanrooms combined with volatile organic compounds filtration system for micromanipulation and embryo culture in severe male factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 2006;86 Suppl 2:S353–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Verza Jr S, Esteves SC. Microsurgical versus conventional single-biopsy testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia: a prospective controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(Suppl):S5.Google Scholar