The Hutchins–Schelleng Violin Octet After 50 Years

  • George Bissinger


Scientifically speaking, the Hutchins–Schelleng violin octet is the most interesting of all the bowed string instruments. We refer specifically to those instruments resulting from the first application of physics to the design of bowed string instruments, viz., the scientific resonance scaling process developed by John Schelleng to dimension the violin – certainly the most “successful” and mature bowed string instrument – to cover a 3½ octave range.


Cavity Mode Experimental Modal Analysis 2DOF Model Large Instrument Complete Scaling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



My contribution to violin octet research discussed here owes much to the active support of Carleen Hutchins who loaned me a complete octet for modal testing and the National Science Foundation who funded the materials-dynamics approach embodied in VIOCADEAS. I also want to acknowledge discussions with Robert Spear concerning the present and future status of the violin octet.


  1. Bissinger G (1992a) “Semiempirical relationships for A0 and A1 cavity mode frequencies for bowed string instruments of the violin, viola and cello family” Catgut Acoust. Soc. J. (series II) 2(1), 8–12.Google Scholar
  2. Bissinger G (1992b) “The effect of violin cavity volume (height) changes on the cavity modes below 2 kHz” Catgut Acoust. Soc. J. (series II) 2(2), 18–21.Google Scholar
  3. Bissinger G (1996). “Acoustic normal modes below 4 kHz for a rigid, closed violin-shaped cavity” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 1835–1840.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bissinger G (1998) “A0 and A1 coupling, arching, rib height, and f-hole geometry dependence in the 2-degree-of-freedom network model of violin cavity modes” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 3608–3615.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bissinger G (2003a) “Wall compliance and violin cavity modes” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 1718–1723.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bissinger G (2003b) “Modal analysis of a violin octet” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 2105–2113.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bissinger G (2005) “A unified materials – normal mode approach to violin acoustics” Acta Acustica/Acustica 91, 214–228.Google Scholar
  8. Bissinger G (2007) “Surprising regularity between plate modes 2 and 5 and the B1 corpus modes: Part I” J. Violin Soc. Am. VSA Papers 21, 83–101.Google Scholar
  9. Bissinger G, Hutchins CM (1988) “A1 cavity-mode-enhanced fundamental in bowed violin and viola sound” Catgut Acoust. Soc. J. (series II) 1(2), 11–13.Google Scholar
  10. Bissinger G, Rowe D (2007) “Three-dimensional normal mode vibration plus acoustic analysis of two exemplary old Italian violins (abstract)” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 3061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bissinger G, Williams EG, Valdivia N (2007) “Violin f-hole contribution to far-field radiation via patch near-field acoustical holography” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 3899–3906.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hutchins CM (1967) “Founding a family of fiddles” Phys. Today 20(2), 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hutchins CM (1976) “The Helmholtz air resonance of the cello and baritone” Catgut Acoust. Soc. Newsl. 26, 5–6.ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Hutchins CM (1986). “Free plate tuning frequencies for the violin octet instruments” J. Catgut Acoust. Soc. 45, 12–14.Google Scholar
  15. Hutchins CM (1992a) “A 30-year experiment in the acoustical and musical development of violin-family instruments” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 639–650.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hutchins CM (1992b). “The future of violin research” Catgut Acoust. Soc. J. (series II) 2(1), 1–7.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Hutchins CM, Schelleng JC (1967) “A new concert violin” J. Audio Eng. Soc. 15, 4–6.Google Scholar
  18. Jansson E (1973) “On higher air modes in the violin” Catgut Acoust. Soc. Newsl. 19, 13–15.Google Scholar
  19. Jansson E (1977) “Acoustical properties of complex cavities: prediction and measurements of resonance properties of violin-shaped and guitar-shaped cavities” Acustica 37, 211–221.Google Scholar
  20. Jansson E, Sundin H (1974) “A pilot study on coupling between top plate and air volume vibrations” Catgut Acoust. Soc. Newsl. 21, 11–15.Google Scholar
  21. Knott GA (1987) “A modal analysis of the violin using the MSC/NASTRAN and PATRAN”, MS thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.Google Scholar
  22. Marshall KD (1985) “Modal analysis of a violin” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 695–709.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saunders F (1953) “Recent work on violins” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 25, 491–498.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schelleng J (1963) “The violin as a circuit” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35, 326–338 (erratum, p. 1291).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schleske M (1996) “Eigenmodes of vibration in the working process of a violin” Catgut Acoust. Soc. J. (series II) 3(1), 2–8.Google Scholar
  26. Shaw EAG (1990) “Cavity resonance in the violin: network representation and the effect of damped and undamped rib holes” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 398–410.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Spear R (2003) “Influence of form on the signature modes of a second-generation new violin family quintet” Catgut Acoust. Soc. J. (series II) 4(8), 19–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Acoustics LaboratoryEast Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations