Dynamic Perspectives on the Control of Animal Disease: Merging Epidemiology and Economics
The literature on managing animal diseases has its roots in mathematical epidemiology, which focuses on understanding the dynamics of infectious populations (Kermack and McKendrick 1927; Anderson and May 1979). Mathematical epidemiology models can be used to predict the conditions under which disease prevalence will diminish over time and eventually be eradicated from the animal system. Management in this context generally is viewed as a sequence of exogenous perturbations designed to produce the required conditions for prevalence decline and, when possible, eradication (Heesterbeek and Roberts 1995).
KeywordsSupplemental Feeding Marginal Damage Bioeconomic Model Human Choice Tasmanian Devil
- Barlow, N.D. “Critical Evaluation of Wildlife Disease Models”, in Ecology of Infectious Diseases in Natural Populations (eds. B.T. Grenfell & A.P. Dobson), Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
- Chowell, G. and F. Brauer 2009. The basic reproduction number of infectious diseases: computation and estimation using compartmental epidemic models, in Mathematical and Statistical Estimation Approaches in Epidemiology (G. Chowell et al., eds), Springer.Google Scholar
- Clark, CW. 2005. Mathematical Bioeconomics Optimal Management of Renewable Resources Second Edition. Hoboken: Jon Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Ewing, J. 2005. The Mesoamerican Biological Corridor: a bridge across the Americas. EcoWorld Magazine. Dec. 19. available at http://www.ecoworld.com/home/articles2.cfm?tid=377 (downloaded November 3, 2006).
- Gichohi, HW. 2003. Direct payments as a mechanism for conserving important wildlife corridor links between Nairobi National Park and its wider ecosystem: the Wildlife Conservation Lease program, Presented at Vth World Parks Congress, Sustainable Finance Stream, Durban South Africa.Google Scholar
- Gubbins, S., S. Carpenter, M. Baylis, J.L.N. Wood, and P.S. Mellor. 2008. Assessing the risk of bluetongue to UK livestock: uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of a temperature-dependent model for the basic reproduction number. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 5:363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hartup, BK, GV Kollias, and DH Ley. 2000. Mycoplasmal conjunctivitis in songbirds from New York. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 32: 257–64.Google Scholar
- Heesterbeek, JAP, and MG Roberts. 1995. Mathematical models for microparasites of wildlife. In Ecology of Infectious Diseases in Natural Populations. eds. BT Grenfell, AP Dobson. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Leonard, D. and N. van Long. 1993. Optimal Control Theory and Static Optimization in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15: 237–40.Google Scholar
- Mahul, O., and B. Durand. “Simulated economic consequences of foot-and-mouth disease epidemics and their public control in France.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 47, no. 1-2(2000): 23–38.Google Scholar
- Platt, J. 2009. New test creates hope for cancer-plagued Tasmanian devils. Scientific American April 3. Accessed October 27, 2009, available online at http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=new-test-creates-hope-for-cancer-pl-2009-04-03.
- Save the Tasmanian Devil (STTD). 2009. Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumor Disease. Online at: http://tassiedevil.com.au/disease.html. Accessed June 17, 2009.
- Smith, G.C., and C.L. Cheeseman. 2002. A Mathematical Model for the Control of Disease in Wildlife Populations: Culling, Vaccination and Fertility Control, Ecological Modeling 150: 45–53.Google Scholar
- United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS). 2002. Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccine Factsheet, January.Google Scholar
- Watry, M.K., LL Wolfe, JG Powers, and M.A. Wild. 2004. Comparing Implementation of a Live Test-and-Cull Program for Chronic Wasting Disease in Wildland and Urban Settings. Proceedings: Health and Conservation of Free-Ranging Wildlife, Joint Conference of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians, American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians, and Wildlife Disease Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
- Wobeser, G. 2002. Disease management strategies for wildlife. Revue scientifique et technique Office International des Epizooties 21: 159–78.Google Scholar