Dynamic Perspectives on the Control of Animal Disease: Merging Epidemiology and Economics

  • Richard D. Horan
  • Christopher A. Wolf
  • Eli P. Fenichel
Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 36)


The literature on managing animal diseases has its roots in mathematical epidemiology, which focuses on understanding the dynamics of infectious populations (Kermack and McKendrick 1927; Anderson and May 1979). Mathematical epidemiology models can be used to predict the conditions under which disease prevalence will diminish over time and eventually be eradicated from the animal system. Management in this context generally is viewed as a sequence of exogenous perturbations designed to produce the required conditions for prevalence decline and, when possible, eradication (Heesterbeek and Roberts 1995).


Supplemental Feeding Marginal Damage Bioeconomic Model Human Choice Tasmanian Devil 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anderson, RM, and RM May. 1979. Population Biology of Infectious Diseases: Part I. Nature 280: 361–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, RM, and RM May. 1986. The invasion, persistence, and spread of infectious disease within animal and plant communities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Science 314: 533–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow, N.D. “Critical Evaluation of Wildlife Disease Models”, in Ecology of Infectious Diseases in Natural Populations (eds. B.T. Grenfell & A.P. Dobson), Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. Barlow, ND, JM Kean, NP Caldwell, and TJ Ryan. 1998. Modelling the regional dynamics and management of bovine tuberculosis in New Zealand cattle herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 36(1): 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett, S, and M Hoel. 2007. Optimal disease eradication. Environmental and Development Economics 12: 627–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bicknell, KB, JE Wilen, and RE Howitt. 1999. Public policy and private incentives for livestock disease control. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 43: 501–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bienen, L, and G Tabor. 2006. Applying an ecosystem approach to brucellosis control: can an old conflict between wildlife and agriculture be successfully managed? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4: 319–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burrows, R. 1992. Rabies in Wild Dogs. Nature 359: 277–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burrows, R., H. Hofer, and M.L. East. 1994. Demography, Extinction and Intervention in a Small Population: the Case of the Serengeti Wild Dogs. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 256: 281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chowell, G. and F. Brauer 2009. The basic reproduction number of infectious diseases: computation and estimation using compartmental epidemic models, in Mathematical and Statistical Estimation Approaches in Epidemiology (G. Chowell et al., eds), Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, CW. 2005. Mathematical Bioeconomics Optimal Management of Renewable Resources Second Edition. Hoboken: Jon Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  12. Daszak, P, AA Cunningham, and AD Hyatt. 2000. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife-threats to biodiversity and human health. Science 287: 443–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diekmann, O, JAP Heesterbeek, and JAJ Metz. 1990. “On the definition and computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models of infectious disease in heterogeneous populations.” Journal of Mathematical Biology 28:365–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dobson, A. 2004. Population dynamics of pathogens with multiple hosts species. The American Naturalist 164: s64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dobson, A, and J. Foufopoulos. 2001. Emerging infectious pathogens of wildlife. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Science 356: 1001–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ewing, J. 2005. The Mesoamerican Biological Corridor: a bridge across the Americas. EcoWorld Magazine. Dec. 19. available at http://www.ecoworld.com/home/articles2.cfm?tid=377 (downloaded November 3, 2006).
  17. Fenichel, EP, and RD Horan. 2007a. “Gender-based harvesting in wildlife disease management”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89: 904–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fenichel, EP, and RD Horan. 2007b. Jointly-determined ecological thresholds and economic trade-offs in wildlife disease management. Natural Resource Modeling 20: 511–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fenichel, E.P., R.D. Horan, and G. Hickling. 2010. “Management of Infectious Wildlife Diseases: Bridging Conventional and Bioeconomic Approaches”, Ecological Applications, 20: 903–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fulford GR, MG Roberts, and JAP Heesterbeek. 2002. The metapopulation dynamics of an infectious disease: tuberculosis in possums. Theoretical Population Biology 61: 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gichohi, HW. 2003. Direct payments as a mechanism for conserving important wildlife corridor links between Nairobi National Park and its wider ecosystem: the Wildlife Conservation Lease program, Presented at Vth World Parks Congress, Sustainable Finance Stream, Durban South Africa.Google Scholar
  22. Gubbins, S., S. Carpenter, M. Baylis, J.L.N. Wood, and P.S. Mellor. 2008. Assessing the risk of bluetongue to UK livestock: uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of a temperature-dependent model for the basic reproduction number. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 5:363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hartup, BK, GV Kollias, and DH Ley. 2000. Mycoplasmal conjunctivitis in songbirds from New York. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 32: 257–64.Google Scholar
  24. Heesterbeek, JAP, and MG Roberts. 1995. Mathematical models for microparasites of wildlife. In Ecology of Infectious Diseases in Natural Populations. eds. BT Grenfell, AP Dobson. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Heffernan, JM, RJ Smith, and LM Wahl. 2005. Perspectives on the basic reproductive ratio. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2: 281–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hennessy, D.A. “Behavioral incentives, equilibrium endemic disease, and health management policy for farmed animals”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(2007a): 698–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hennessy, D.A. “Biosecurity and Spread of an Infectious Animal Disease”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(2007b): 1226–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hennessy, D.A., J. Roosen, and H.H. Jensen. “Infectious Disease, Productivity, and Scale in Open and Closed Animal Production Systems”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87(2005): 900–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hethcote, HW. 2000. The mathematics of infectious diseases. SIAM Review 42: 599–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holt, RD, AP Dobson, M Begon, RG Bowers, and EM Schauber. 2003. Parasite establishment in host communities. Ecology Letters 6: 837–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Horan, RD, and CA Wolf. 2005. The economics of managing infectious wildlife disease. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87: 537–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Horan, RD, CA Wolf, EP Fenichel, and KH Mathews Jr. 2005. Spatial management of wildlife disease. Review of Agricultural Economics 27: 483–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Horan, RD, CA Wolf, EP Fenichel, and KH Mathews Jr. 2008. Joint management of wildlife and livestock disease. Environmental and Resource Economics 41: 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaiser, J. 2001. Conservation biology: bold corridor project confronts reality. Science 21: 2196–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kermack, WO, and AG McKendrick. 1927. Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics, part I. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh A 115: 700–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lanfranchi, P, E Ferroglio, G Poglayen, and V Guberti. 2003. Wildlife vaccination, conservation and public health. Veterinary Research Communications 27:567–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leonard, D. and N. van Long. 1993. Optimal Control Theory and Static Optimization in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15: 237–40.Google Scholar
  39. Mahul, O., and B. Durand. “Simulated economic consequences of foot-and-mouth disease epidemics and their public control in France.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 47, no. 1-2(2000): 23–38.Google Scholar
  40. Mahul, O., and A. Gohin. “Irreversible decision making in contagious animal disease control under uncertainty: an illustration using FMD in Brittany.” European Review of Agriculture Economics 26 (1999): 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCallum, H, N Barlow, and J Hone. 2001. How Should Pathogen Transmission be Modelled? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McInerney, J.P., K.S. Howe, and J.A. Schepers. “A Framework for the Economic Analysis of Disease in Farm Livestock”, Preventive Veterinary Medicine 13(1992): 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Platt, J. 2009. New test creates hope for cancer-plagued Tasmanian devils. Scientific American April 3. Accessed October 27, 2009, available online at http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=new-test-creates-hope-for-cancer-pl-2009-04-03.
  44. Roberts, MG, and JAP Heesterbeek. 2003. A new method for estimating the effort required to control an infectious disease. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270:1359–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rowthorn, RE, R Laxminarayan, and CA Gilligan. 2009. Optimal control of epidemics in metapopulations. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 6: 1135–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sanchirico, JN, and JE Wilen. 1999. Bioeconomics of spatial exploitation in a patchy environment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37: 129–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Save the Tasmanian Devil (STTD). 2009. Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumor Disease. Online at: http://tassiedevil.com.au/disease.html. Accessed June 17, 2009.
  48. Schmitt, SM, DJ O’Brien, CS Bruning-Fann, and SD Fitzgerald. 2002. Bovine tuberculosis in Michigan wildlife and livestock. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 969: 262–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith, G.C., and C.L. Cheeseman. 2002. A Mathematical Model for the Control of Disease in Wildlife Populations: Culling, Vaccination and Fertility Control, Ecological Modeling 150: 45–53.Google Scholar
  50. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS). 2002. Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccine Factsheet, January.Google Scholar
  51. Watry, M.K., LL Wolfe, JG Powers, and M.A. Wild. 2004. Comparing Implementation of a Live Test-and-Cull Program for Chronic Wasting Disease in Wildland and Urban Settings. Proceedings: Health and Conservation of Free-Ranging Wildlife, Joint Conference of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians, American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians, and Wildlife Disease Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  52. Wirl, F. 1992. Cyclical strategies in two-dimensional optimal control models: necessary conditions and existence. Annals of Operations Research 37: 345–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wirl, F. 1995. The cyclical exploitation of renewable resource stocks may be optimal. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29:252–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wobeser, G. 2002. Disease management strategies for wildlife. Revue scientifique et technique Office International des Epizooties 21: 159–78.Google Scholar
  55. Wolfe,L.L., M.W. Miller, and E.S. Williams. 2004. Feasibility of “Test and Cull” for Managing Chronic Wasting Disease in Urban Mule Deer. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32: 500–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard D. Horan
    • 1
  • Christopher A. Wolf
    • 1
  • Eli P. Fenichel
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource EconomicsMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.School of Life Science and ecoServices GroupArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations