Advertisement

Autosomal Lyonization of Replication Domains During Early Mammalian Development

  • Ichiro Hiratani
  • David M. Gilbert
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 695)

Abstract

It has been exactly 50 years since it was discovered that duplication of the eukaryotic genome follows a defined temporal order as cells progress through S-phase. While the mechanism of this replication-timing program still remains a mystery, various correlations of this program with both static and dynamic properties of chromatin render it an attractive forum to explore previously impenetrable higher-order organization of chromosomes. Indeed, studies of DNA replication have provided a simple and straightforward approach to address physical organization of the genome, both along the length of the chromosome as well as in the context of the 3-dimensional space in the cell nucleus. In this chapter, we summarize the 50-years history of the pursuit for understanding the replication-timing program and its developmental regulation, primarily in mammalian cells. We begin with the discovery of the replication-timing program, discuss developmental regulation of this program during X-inactivation in females as well as on autosomes and then describe the recent findings from genome-wide dissection of this program, with special reference to what takes place during mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation. We make an attempt to interpret what these findings might represent and discuss their potential relevance to embryonic development. In doing so, we revive an old concept of “autosomal Lyonization” to describe “facultative heterochromatinization” and irreversible silencing of individual replication domains on autosomes reminiscent of the stable silencing of the inactive X chromosome, which takes place at a stage equivalent to the postimplantation epiblast in mice.

Keywords

Inner Cell Mass Replication Timing Nuclear Periphery Long Intersperse Nuclear Element Late Replication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hiratani I, Takebayashi S, Lu J et al. Replication timing and transcriptional control: beyond cause and effect—part II. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2009; 19:142–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Adzhubei I, Thurman RE et al. Human mutation rate associated with DNA replication timing. Nat Genet 2009; 41:393–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chang BH, Smith L, Huang J et al. Chromosomes with delayed replication timing lead to checkpoint activation, delayed recruitment of Aurora B and chromosome instability. Oncogene 2007; 26:1852–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tabancay AP Jr, Forsburg SL. Eukaryotic DNA replication in a chromatin context. Curr Top Dev Biol 2006; 76:129–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    MacAlpine DM, Bell SP. A genomic view of eukaryotic DNA replication. Chromosome Res 2005; 13:309–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morishima A, Grumbach MM, Taylor JH. Asynchronous duplication of human chromosomes and the origin of sex chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1962; 48:756–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hiratani I, Ryba T, Itoh M et al. Global reorganization of replication domains during embryonic stem cell differentiation. PLoS Biol 2008; 6:e245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hiratani I, Ryba T, Itoh M et al. Genome-Wide Dynamics of Replication Timing Revealed by In Vitro Models of Mouse Embryogenesis. Genome Res 2010; 20:155–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holmquist GP. Role of replication time in the control of tissue-specific gene expression. Am J Hum Genet 1987; 40:151–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pope BD, Hiratani I, Gilbert DM. Domain-Wide Regulation of DNA Replication Timing During Mammalian Development. Chromosome Research 2010; 18:127–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taylor JH. Intracellular localization of labeled nucleic acid determined by autoradiographs. Science 1953; 118:555–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meselson M, Stahl FW. The Replication of DNA in Escherichia Coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1958; 44:671–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taylor JH, Woods PS, Hughes WL. The Organization and Duplication of Chromosomes as Reveals by Autoradiographic Studies Using Tritium-Labeled Thymidine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1957; 43:122–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taylor JH. The mode of chromosome duplication in Crepis capillaris. Exp Cell Res 1958; 15:350–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taylor JH. Asynchronous duplication of chromosomes in cultured cells of Chinese hamster. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 1960; 7:455–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Latt SA. Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1973; 70:3395–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Latt SA. Fluorescent probes of chromosome structure and replication. Can J Genet Cytol 1977; 19:603–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stubblefield E. Analysis of the replication pattern of Chinese hamster chromosomes using 5-bromodeoxyuridine suppression of 33258 Hoechst fluorescence. Chromosoma 1975; 53:209–21.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Latt S A. Fluorescence analysis of late DNA replication in human metaphase chromosomes. Somatic Cell Genet 1975; 1:293–321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lima De Faria A. Incorporation of tritiated thymidine into meiotic chromosomes. Science 1959; 130:503–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Epplen JT, Siebers JW, Vogel W. DNA replication patterns of human chromosomes from fibroblasts and amniotic fluid cells revealed by a Giemsa staining technique. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1975; 15:177–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stambrook PJ, Flickinger RA. Changes in chromosomal DNA replication patterns in developing frog embryos. J Exp Zool 1970; 174:101–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barr ML, Bertram EG. A morphological distinction between neurones of the male and female and the behaviour of the nucleolar satellite during accelerated nucleoprotein synthesis. Nature 1949; 163:676.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lyon MF. Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). Nature 1961; 190:372–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heard E, Disteche CM. Dosage compensation in mammals: fine-tuning the expression of the X chromosome. Genes Dev 2006; 20:1848–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Deakin JE, Chaumeil J, Hore TA et al. Unravelling the evolutionary origins of X chromosome inactivation in mammals: insights from marsupials and monotremes. Chromosome Res 2009; 17:671–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ho KK, Deakin JE, Wright ML et al. Replication asynchrony and differential condensation of X chromosomes in female platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus). Reprod Fertil Dev 2009; 21:952–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Koina E, Chaumeil J, Greaves IK et al. Specific patterns of histone marks accompany X chromosome inactivation in a marsupial. Chromosome Res 2009; 17:115–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Takagi N, Sugawara O, Sasaki M. Regional and temporal changes in the pattern of X-chromosome replication during the early post-implantation development of the female mouse. Chromosoma 1982; 85:275–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lock LF, Takagi N, Martin GR. Methylation of the Hprt gene on the inactive X occurs after chromosome inactivation. Cell 1987; 48:39–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chow J, Heard E. X inactivation and the complexities of silencing a sex chromosome. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2009; 21:359–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Keohane AM, O’Neill LP, Belyaev ND, Lavender JS, Turner BM. X-Inactivation and histone H4 acetylation in embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol 1996; 180:618–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chaumeil J, Okamoto I, Guggiari M et al. Integrated kinetics of X chromosome inactivation in differentiating embryonic stem cells. Cytogenet Genome Res 2002; 99:75–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wutz A, Jaenisch R. A shift from reversible to irreversible X inactivation is triggered during ES cell differentiation. Mol Cell 2000; 5:695–705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sugawara O, Takagi N, Sasaki M. Correlation between X-chromosome inactivation and cell differentiation in female preimplantation mouse embryos. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1985; 39:210–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Snow MHL. Gastrulation in the mouse: growth and regionalization of the epiblast. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1977; 42:293–303.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Balazs I, Brown EH, Schildkraut CL. The temporal order of replication of some DNA cistrons. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1974; 38:239–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Burke W, Fangman WL. Temporal order in yeast chromosome replication. Cell 1975; 5:263–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hatton KS, Dhar V, Brown EH et al. Replication program of active and inactive multigene families in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 1988; 8:2149–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Goldman MA, Holmquist GP, Gray MC et al. Replication timing of genes and middle repetitive sequences. Science 1984; 224:686–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Epner E, Reik A, Cimbora D et al. The beta-globin LCR is not necessary for an open chromatin structure or developmentally regulated transcription of the native mouse beta-globin locus. Mol Cell 1998; 2:447–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Taljanidisz J, Popowski J, Sarkar N. Temporal order of gene replication in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mol Cell Biol 1989; 9:2881–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gilbert DM. Temporal order of replication of Xenopus laevis 5S ribosomal RNA genes in somatic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986; 83:2924–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hiratani I, Leskovar A, Gilbert DM. Differentiation-induced replication-timing changes are restricted to AT-rich/ long interspersed nuclear element (LINE)-rich isochores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:16861–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Perry P, Sauer S, Billon N et al. A dynamic switch in the replication timing of key regulator genes in embryonic stem cells upon neural induction. Cell Cycle 2004; 3:1645–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gilbert DM. Replication timing and transcriptional control: beyond cause and effect. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2002; 14:377–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Azuara V, Brown KE, Williams RR et al. Heritable gene silencing in lymphocytes delays chromatid resolution without affecting the timing of DNA replication. Nat Cell Biol 2003; 5:668–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Raghuraman MK, Winzeler EA, Collingwood D et al. Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 2001; 294:115–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hayashi M, Katou Y, Itoh T et al. Genome-wide localization of preRC sites and identification of replication origins in fission yeast. EMBO J 2007; 26:1327–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schubeler D, Scalzo D, Kooperberg C et al. Genome-wide DNA replication profile for Drosophila melanogaster: a link between transcription and replication timing. Nat Genet 2002; 32:438–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    MacAlpine DM, Rodriguez HK, Bell SP. Coordination of replication and transcription along a Drosophila chromosome. Genes Dev 2004; 18:3094–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Woodfine K, Fiegler H, Beare DM et al. Replication timing of the human genome. Hum Mol Genet 2004; 13:191–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    White EJ, Emanuelsson O, Scalzo D et al. DNA replication-timing analysis of human chromosome 22 at high resolution and different developmental states. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:17771–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Jeon Y, Bekiranov S, Karnani N et al. Temporal profile of replication of human chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:6419–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Karnani N, Taylor C, Malhotra A et al. Pan-S replication patterns and chromosomal domains defined by genome-tiling arrays of ENCODE genomic areas. Genome Res 2007; 17:865–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Farkash-Amar S, Lipson D, Polten A et al. Global organization of replication time zones of the mouse genome. Genome Res 2008; 18:1562–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Schwaiger M, Stadler MB, Bell O et al. Chromatin state marks cell-type-and gender-specific replication of the Drosophila genome. Genes Dev 2009; 23:589–601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Desprat R, Thierry-Mieg D, Lailler N et al. Predictable Dynamic Program of Timing of DNA Replication in Human Cells. Genome Res 2009; 19:2288–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gilbert DM. Replication timing and metazoan evolution. Nat Genet 2002; 32:336–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Schmegner C, Hameister H, Vogel W et al. Isochores and replication time zones: a perfect match. Cytogenet Genome Res 2007; 116:167–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Grasser F, Neusser M, Fiegler H et al. Replication-timing-correlated spatial chromatin arrangements in cancer and in primate interphase nuclei. J Cell Sci 2008; 121:1876–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Costantini M, Bernardi G. Replication timing, chromosomal bands and isochores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:3433–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Brons IG, Smithers LE, Trotter MW et al. Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 2007; 448:191–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tesar PJ, Chenoweth JG, Brook FA et al. New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature 2007; 448:196–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Aladjem MI. Replication in context: dynamic regulation of DNA replication patterns in metazoans. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8:588–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Wu J-R, Gilbert DM. A distinct G1 step required to specify the chinese hamster DHFR replication origin. Science 1996; 271:1270–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Dimitrova DS, Gilbert DM. The spatial position and replication timing of chromosomal domains are both established in early G1-phase. Mol Cell 1999; 4:983–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Li F, Chen J, Solessio E et al. Spatial distribution and specification of mammalian replication origins during G1 phase. J Cell Biol 2003; 161:257–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Dimitrova DS, Prokhorova TA, Blow JJ et al. Mammalian nuclei become licensed for DNA replication during late telophase. J Cell Sci 2002; 115:51–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Yokochi T, Poduch K, Ryba T et al. G9a Selectively Represses a Class of Late-Replicating Genes at the Nuclear Periphery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19363–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Wu R, Singh PB, Gilbert DM. Uncoupling global and fine-tuning replication timing determinants for mouse pericentric heterochromatin. J Cell Biol 2006; 174:185–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Jorgensen HF, Azuara V, Amoils S et al. The impact of chromatin modifiers on the timing of locus replication in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genome Biol 2007; 8:R169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Hayashi MT, Takahashi TS, Nakagawa T et al. The heterochromatin protein Swi6/HP1 activates replication origins at the pericentromeric region and silent mating-type locus. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11:357–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Flickinger R. Replication timing and cell differentiation. Differentiation 2001; 69:18–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Panning MM, Gilbert DM. Spatio-temporal organization of DNA replication in murine embryonic stem, primary and immortalized cells. J Cell Biochem 2005; 95:74–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Wu R, Terry AV, Singh PB et al. Differential subnuclear localization and replication timing of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation states. Mol Biol Cell 2005; 16:2872–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Gilbert DM, Gasser SM. Nuclear Structure and DNA Replication. In: DePamphilis ML, ed. DNA Replication and Human Disease. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Berezney R, Dubey DD, Huberman JA. Heterogeneity of eukaryotic replicons, replicon clusters and replication foci. Chromosoma 2000; 108:471–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Williams RR, Azuara V, Perry P et al. Neural induction promotes large-scale chromatin reorganisation of the Mash1 locus. J Cell Sci 2006; 119:132–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L et al. Comprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding Principles of the Human Genome. Science 2009; 326:289–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Bazett-Jones DP, Li R, Fussner E et al. Elucidating chromatin and nuclear domain architecture with electron spectroscopic imaging. Chromosome Res 2008; 16:397–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Jaenisch R, Young R. Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Cell 2008; 132:567–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Rathjen J, Lake JA, Bettess MD et al. Formation of a primitive ectoderm like cell population, EPL cells, from ES cells in response to biologically derived factors. J Cell Sci 1999; 112 (Pt 5):601–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Gardner RL, Brook FA. Reflections on the biology of embryonic stem (ES) cells. Int J Dev Biol 1997; 41:235–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Pfister S, Steiner KA, Tam PP. Gene expression pattern and progression of embryogenesis in the immediate post-implantation period of mouse development. Gene Expr Patterns 2007; 7:558–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Guo G, Yang J, Nichols J et al. Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency. Development 2009; 136:1063–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Lyon MF, Rastan S. Parental source of chromosome imprinting and its relevance for X chromosome inactivation. Differentiation 1984; 26:63–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Maherali N, Sridharan R, Xie W et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 2007; 1:55–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Sridharan R, Tchieu J, Mason MJ et al. Role of the murine reprogramming factors in the induction of pluripotency. Cell 2009; 136:364–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Li F, Chen J, Izumi M et al. The replication timing program of the Chinese hamster beta-globin locus is established coincident with its repositioning near peripheral heterochromatin in early G1 phase. J Cell Biol 2001; 154:283–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Raghuraman M, Brewer B, Fangman W. Cell cycle-dependent establishment of a late replication program. Science 1997; 276:806–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Walter J, Schermelleh L, Cremer M et al. Chromosome order in HeLa cells changes during mitosis and early G1, but is stably maintained during subsequent interphase stages. J Cell Biol 2003; 160:685–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Thomson I, Gilchrist S, Bickmore WA et al. The radial positioning of chromatin is not inherited through mitosis but is established de novo in early G1. Curr Biol 2004; 14:166–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Kumaran RI, Spector DL. A genetic locus targeted to the nuclear periphery in living cells maintains its transcriptional competence. J Cell Biol 2008; 180:51–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Reddy KL, Zullo JM, Bertolino E et al. Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature 2008; 452:243–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Zhang J, Xu F, Hashimshony T et al. Establishment of transcriptional competence in early and late S phase. Nature 2002; 420:198–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Gilbert DM, Cohen SN. Bovine papilloma virus plasmids replicate randomly in mouse fibroblasts throughout S-phase of the cell cycle. Cell 1987; 50:59–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Lande-Diner L, Zhang J, Cedar H. Shifts in replication timing actively affect histone acetylation during nucleosome reassembly. Mol Cell 2009; 34:767–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Versini G, Comet I, Wu M et al. The yeast Sgs1 helicase is differentially required for genomic and ribosomal DNA replication. EMBO J 2003; 22:1939–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    McCune HJ, Danielson LS, Alvino GM et al. The Temporal Program of Chromosome Replication: Genomewide Replication in clb5{Delta} Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2008; 180:1833–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Hiratani I, Gilbert DM. Replication timing as an epigenetic mark. Epigenetics 2009; 4:93–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Gilbert DM. Temporal order of DNA replication in eukaryotic cells: it’s relationship to gene expression. Genetics. Stanford: Stanford University, 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological ScienceFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations