Need- and Task-Based Design and Evaluation

  • Albert M. Cook
  • Jan Miller Polgar
  • Nigel J. Livingston
Chapter

Abstract

Unfortunately, device abandonment (by clients or caregivers) is a pervasive problem in the provision of assistive technology. This is not necessarily the result of poor design of the technology, but rather a failure to account for other factors or determinants. This issue can be successfully addressed by employing the human activity assistive technology (HAAT) model when considering potential solutions for clients. The model conceptualizes the consumer, their activities, environment, and assistive technology as an integrated system in which changing one element affects all other elements in the system. The model can be applied in the design, selection, and evaluation of technology for use by an individual, or as a conceptual model for exploring the influence of assistive technology on participation in daily activities. In this chapter, examples and explanations are given for both “successful” and “failed” technologies with specific reference to the HAAT model.

Keywords

Dementia Shoe Carol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blackstone S (2003) Social networks. Augmentative Communication News 15(1):1–16, http://www.augcominc.com/index.cfm/acn.htm
  2. 2.
    Cook AM, Polgar JM (2008) Cook and Hussey’s Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice, 3rd edn. Elsevier, MOGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Louise-Bender Pape T, Kim J, Weiner B (2002) The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: A review of personal factors. Disability and Rehabilitation 24(1–3):5–20Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Phillips B, Zhao H (1993) Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology 5(1):36–45Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scherer MJ, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, Cushman L, Scherer J (2005) Predictors of assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disability and Rehabilitation 27(21):1321–1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Townsend E, Stanton S, Law M, Polatajko M, Baptiste S, Thompson-Franson T, Kramer C, Swedlove F, Brintnell S, Campanile L (eds) (2002) Enabling Occupation: An Occupational Therapy Perspective. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, Ottawa, ON, http://www.caot.ca

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert M. Cook
    • 1
  • Jan Miller Polgar
    • 2
  • Nigel J. Livingston
    • 3
  1. 1.Audiology and Speech Pathology, Faculty of Rehabilitation MedicineUniversity of AlbertaAlbertaCanada
  2. 2.School of Occupational TherapyUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  3. 3.University of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations