Advertisement

Expression and Functions of the Star Proteins Sam68 and t-star in Mammalian Spermatogenesis

  • Ingrid Ehrmann
  • David J. Elliott
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 693)

Abstract

Spermatogenesis is one of the few major developmental pathways which are still ongoing in the adult. In this chapter we review the properties of Sam68 and T-STAR, which are the STAR proteins functionally implicated in mammalian spermatogenesis. Sam68 is a ubiquitously expressed member of the STAR family, but has an essential role in spermatogenesis. Sam68 null mice are male infertile and at least in part this is due to a failure in important translational controls that operate during and after meiosis. The homologous T-STAR protein has a much more restricted anatomic expression pattern than Sam68, with highest levels seen in the testis and the developing brain. The focus of this chapter is the functional role of Sam68 and T-STAR proteins in male germ cell development. Since these proteins are known to have many cellular functions we extrapolate from other cell types and tissues to speculate on each of their likely functions within male germ cells, including control of alternative pre-mRNA splicing patterns in male germ cells.

Keywords

Male Germ Cell Round Spermatid Arginine Methylation Star Protein Splice Silencer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sassone-Corsi P. Stem cells of the germline: the specialized facets of their differentiation program. Cell Cycle 2008;7(22):3491–3492.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kierszenbaum AL. Apoptosis during spermatogenesis: the thrill of being alive. Mol Reprod Dev 2001;58(1):1–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wrobel G, Primig M. Mammalian male germ cells are fertile ground for expression profiling of sexual reproduction. Reproduction 2005;129(1):1–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paronetto MP, Sette C. Role of RNA-binding proteins in mammalian spermatogenesis. Int J Androl 2009.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kan Z, Garrett-Engele PW, Johnson JM et al. Evolutionarily conserved and diverged alternative splicing events show different expression and functional profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33(17):5659–5666.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dass B, Tardif S, Park JY et al. Loss of polyadenylation protein tauCstF-64 causes spermatogenic defects and male infertility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104(51):20374–20379.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu D, Brockman JM, Dass B et al. Systematic variation in mRNA 3′-processing signals during mouse spermatogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res 2 2007;35(1):234–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vernet C, Artzt K. STAR, a gene family involved in signal transduction and activation of RNA. Trends Genet 1997;13(12):479–484.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Venables JP, Dalgliesh C, Paronetto MP et al. SIAH1 targets the alternative splicing factor T-STAR for degradation by the proteasome. Hum Mol Genet 2004;13(14):1525–1534.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Venables JP, Vernet C, Chew SL et al. T-STAR/ETOILE: a novel relative of SAM68 that interacts with an RNA-binding protein implicated in spermatogenesis. Hum Mol Genet 1999;8(6):959–969.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paronetto MP, Zalfa F, Botti F et al. The nuclear RNA-binding protein Sam68 translocates to the cytoplasm and associates with the polysomes in mouse spermatocytes. Mol Biol Cell 2006;17(1):14–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paronetto MP, Messina V, Bianchi E et al. Sam68 regulates translation of target mRNAs in male germ cells, necessary for mouse spermatogenesis. J Cell Biol 2009;185(2):235–249.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richard S, Torabi N, Franco GV et al. Ablation of the Sam68 RNA binding protein protects mice from age-related bone loss. PLoS Genetics 2005;1(6):e74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lorenzetti D, Bishop CE, Justice MJ. Deletion of the Parkin co-regulated gene causes male sterility in the quaking(viable) mouse mutant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101(22):8402–8407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen T, Damaj BB, Herrera C et al. Self-association of the single-KH-domain family members Sam68, GRP33, GLD-1 and Qk1: role of the KH domain. Mol Cell Biol 1997;17(10):5707–5718.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cote J, Boisvert FM, Boulanger MC et al. Sam68 RNA binding protein is an in vivo substrate for protein arginine N-methyltransferase 1. Mol Biol Cell 2003;14(1):274–287.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rho J, Choi S, Jung CR et al. Arginine methylation of Sam68 and SLM proteins negatively regulates their poly(U) RNA binding activity. Arch Biochem Biophys 2007;466(1):49–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fumagalli S, Totty NF, Hsuan JJ et al. A target for Src in mitosis. Nature 1994;368(6474):871–874.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Richard S, Yu D, Blumer KJ et al. Association of p62, a multifunctional SH2-and SH3-domain-binding protein, with src family tyrosine kinases, Grb2 and phospholipase C gamma-1. Mol Cell Biol 1995;15(1):186–197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taylor SJ, Shalloway D. An RNA-binding protein associated with Src through its SH2 and SH3 domains in mitosis. Nature 1994;368(6474):867–871.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weng Z, Thomas SM, Rickles RJ et al. Identification of Src, Fyn and Lyn SH3-binding proteins: implications for a function of SH3 domains. Mol Cell Biol 1994;14(7):4509–4521.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matter N, Herrlich P, Konig H. Signal-dependent regulation of splicing via phosphorylation of Sam68. Nature 2002;420(6916):691–695.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Paronetto MP, Venables JP, Elliott DJ et al. Tr-kit promotes the formation of a multimolecular complex composed by Fyn, PLCgamma1 and Sam68. Oncogene 2003;22(54):8707–8715.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haegebarth A, Heap D, Bie W et al. The nuclear tyrosine kinase BRK/Sik phosphorylates and inhibits the RNA-binding activities of the Sam68-like mammalian proteins SLM-1 and SLM-2. J Biol Chem 2004;279(52):54398–54404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee J, Burr JG. Salpalpha and Salpbeta, growth-arresting homologs of Sam68. Gene 1999;240(1):133–147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bedford MT, Frankel A, Yaffe MB et al. Arginine methylation inhibits the binding of proline-rich ligands to Src homology 3, but not WW, domains. J Biol Chem 2000;275(21):16030–16036.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dickins RA, Frew IJ, House CM et al. The ubiquitin ligase component Siah1a is required for completion of meiosis I in male mice. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22(7):2294–2303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Manning J, Kumar S. NEDD1: function in microtubule nucleation, spindle assembly and beyond. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2007;39(1):7–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gastwirt RF, McAndrew CW, Donoghue DJ. Speedy/RINGO regulation of CDKs in cell cycle, checkpoint activation and apoptosis. Cell Cycle 2007;6(10):1188–1193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang Z, Kostetskii I, Tang W et al. Deficiency of SPAG16L causes male infertility associated with impaired sperm motility. Biol Reprod 2006;74(4):751–759.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pan Q, Shai O, Lee LJ et al. Deep surveying of alternative splicing complexity in the human transcriptome by high-throughput sequencing. Nat Genet 2008;40(12):1413–1415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang ET, Sandberg R, Luo S et al. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature 2008;456(7221):470–476.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chawla G, Lin CH, Han A et al. Sam68 regulates a set of alternatively spliced exons during neurogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 2009;29(1):201–213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stoss O, Olbrich M, Hartmann AM et al. The STAR/GSG family protein rSLM-2 regulates the selection of alternative splice sites. J Biol Chem 2001;276(12):8665–8673.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tisserant A, Konig H. Signal-regulated Pre-mRNA occupancy by the general splicing factor U2AF. PloS One 2008;3(1):e1418.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cheng C, Sharp PA. Regulation of CD44 alternative splicing by SRm160 and its potential role in tumor cell invasion. Mol Cell Biol 2006;26(1):362–370.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Batsche E, Yaniv M, Muchardt C. The human SWI/SNF subunit Brm is a regulator of alternative splicing. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2006;13(1):22–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Paronetto MP, Achsel T, Massiello A et al. The RNA-binding protein Sam68 modulates the alternative splicing of Bcl-x. J Cell Biol 2007;176(7):929–939.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Venables JP, Elliott DJ, Makarova OV et al. RBMY, a probable human spermatogenesis factor and other hnRNP G proteins interact with Tra2beta and affect splicing. Hum Mol Genet 2000;9(5):685–694.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Heinrich B, Zhang Z, Raitskin O et al. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein G regulates splice site selection by binding to CC(A/C)-rich regions in pre-mRNA. J Biol Chem 2009;284(21):14303–14315.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Liu Y, Bourgeois CF, Pang S et al. The germ cell nuclear proteins hnRNP G-T and RBMY activate a testis-specific exon. PLoS Genetics 2009;5(11):e1000707.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Elliott DJ, Millar MR, Oghene K et al. Expression of RBM in the nuclei of human germ cells is dependent on a critical region of the Y chromosome long arm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94(8):3848–3853.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Elliott DJ, Venables JP, Newton CS et al. An evolutionarily conserved germ cell-specific hnRNP is encoded by a retrotransposed gene. Hum Mol Genet 2000;9(14):2117–2124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ehrmann I, Dalgliesh C, Tsaousi A et al. Haploinsufficiency of the germ cell-specific nuclear RNA binding protein hnRNP G-T prevents functional spermatogenesis in the mouse. Hum Mol Genet 2008;17(18):2803–2818.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sergeant KA, Bourgeois CF, Dalgliesh C et al. Alternative RNA splicing complexes containing the scaffold attachment factor SAFB2. J Cell Sci 2007;120(Pt 2):309–319.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lukong KE, Richard S. Sam68, the KH domain-containing superSTAR. Biochim Biophys Acta 2003;1653(2):73–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Thornton JK, Dalgleish C, Venables JP et al. The tumour-suppressor protein ASPP1 is nuclear in human germ cells and can modulate ratios of CD44 exon V5 spliced isoforms in vivo. Oncogene 2006;25(22):3104–3112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sullivan A, Lu X. ASPP: a new family of oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes. Br J Cancer 2007;96(2):196–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Galarneau A, Richard S. The STAR RNA binding proteins GLD-1, QKI, SAM68 and SLM-2 bind bipartite RNA motifs. BMC Mol Biol 2009;10:47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lin Q, Taylor SJ, Shalloway D. Specificity and determinants of Sam68 RNA binding. Implications for the biological function of K homology domains. J Biol Chem 1997;272(43):27274–27280.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tremblay GA, Richard S. mRNAs associated with the Sam68 RNA binding protein. RNA Biol 2006;3(2):90–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Connolly CM, Dearth AT, Braun RE. Disruption of murine Tenr results in teratospermia and male infertility. Dev Biol 2005;278(1):13–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Varmuza S, Jurisicova A, Okano K et al. Spermiogenesis is impaired in mice bearing a targeted mutation in the protein phosphatase 1cgamma gene. Dev Biol 1999;205(1):98–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Klink VP, Wolniak SM. Centrin is necessary for the formation of the motile apparatus in spermatids of Marsilea. Mol Biol Cell 2001;12(3):761–776.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Chi SW, Zang JB, Mele A et al. Argonaute HITS-CLIP decodes microRNA-mRNA interaction maps. Nature 2009.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Licatalosi DD, Mele A, Fak JJ et al. HITS-CLIP yields genome-wide insights into brain alternative RNA processing. Nature 2008;456(7221):464–469.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ule J, Ule A, Spencer J et al. Nova regulates brain-specific splicing to shape the synapse. Nat Genet 2005;37(8):844–852.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hubbard TJ, Aken BL, Ayling S et al. Ensembl 2009. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37 (Database issue):D690–D697.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Di Fruscio M, Chen T, Richard S. Characterization of Sam68-like mammalian proteins SLM-1 and SLM-2: SLM-1 is a Src substrate during mitosis. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1999;96(6):2710–2715.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Human GeneticsNewcastle University, International Centre for Life, Central ParkwayNewcastleEngland

Personalised recommendations