Integrated Circuit Qualification for Space and Ground-Level Applications: Accelerated Tests and Error-Rate Predictions

Part of the Frontiers in Electronic Testing book series (FRET, volume 41)


Integrated circuits (analog, digital or mixed) sensitivity evaluation to Single Event Effects (SEE) requires specific methodologies and dedicated tools. Indeed, such evaluation is based on data gathered from on-line tests performed in a suitable facility (cyclotron, linear accelerator, laser , etc.). The target circuit is exposed to particles fluxes having features (energy and range in Silicon) somewhat representative of the ones the circuit will encounter in its final environment. This chapter will describe and illustrate with experimental results, the methodologies and the hardware and software developments required for the evaluation of the sensitivity to SEE of integrated circuits. Those techniques will be applied to a SRAM-based FPGA and to a complex processor. In case of sequential circuits such as processors, the sensitivity to SEE will strongly depend on the executed program. Hardware/software fault-injection experiments, performed either on the circuit or on an available model, are proved as being complementary of radiation ground testing. Indeed, data issued from fault injection combined with data issued from radiation ground testing allow in accurately predicting the error rate of any program.


Fault Injection Soft Error Device Under Test Single Event Upset Single Event Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors would like to thank Robert Ecoffet and Michel Pignol from CNES for their significant contribution to these researches started in 1989 and Guy Berger, responsible of the HIF cyclotron where experiments were conducted, who offered a continuous support to this work.

They thank also Dominique Bellin, from e2v, and IROC Company who significantly contributed to the application of the test methods and tools developed at TIMA for the Power PC processor in the frame of the SCADRI project if Rhône-Alpes aeronautics & space Cluster.

Finally, the authors thank Joseph Foucard for his help in the redaction of this chapter.


  1. 1.
    E. Normand, “Single-event effects in avionics”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 43, No 2, pp. 461–474, Apr. 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Ma, P. Dressendorfer, “Ionizing Radiation Effects in MOS Devices and Circuits”, Wiley Eds., New York, 1989.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Faccio, “Design Hardening Methodologies for ASICs”, Radiation Effects on Embedded Systems, ISBN-10 1-4020-5645-1, Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Velazco, F. Faure, “Error Rate Prediction of Digital Architecture: Test Methodology and Tools”, Radiation Effects on Embedded Systems, ISBN-10 1-4020-5645-1, Springer, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bezerra F. et al, “Commercial Processor Single Event Tests”, 1997 RADECS Conference Data Workshop Record, pp. 41–46.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Velazco, S. Karoui, T. Chapuis, D. Benezech, L.H. Rosier, “Heavy ion tests for the 68020 Microprocessor and the 68882 Coprocessor”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 39, No 3, Dec. 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.H. Elder, J. Osborn, W.A. Kolasinsky, R. Koga, “A method for characterizing microprocessor’s vulnerability to SEU”, Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 35, No 6, pp. 1679–1681, Dec. 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Duzellier, G. Berger, “Test Facilities for SEE and Dose Testing”, Radiation Effects on Embedded Systems, ISBN-10 1-4020-5645-1, Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    JEDEC standard, “Measurement and Reporting of Alpha particles and Terrestrial Cosmic Ray-Induced Soft Errors in Semiconductor Devices”, JESD89 Aug. 2001.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Faure, P. Peronnard, R. Velazco, “Thesic+: A flexible system for see testing”, In Proceedings of RADECS, 2002.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Velazco, P. Cheynet, A. Bofill, R. Ecoffet, “THESIC: A testbed suitable for the qualification of integrated circuits devoted to operate in harsh environment”, In Proceedings of IEEE European Test Workshop, pp. 89–90, 1998.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gregory R. Allen, Gary M. Swift, “Single Event Effects Test Results for Advanced Field Programmable Gate Arrays”, IEEE Radiation Effects Data Workshop, July 2006.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Yui, G. Swift, C. Carmichael, “Single Event Upset Susceptibility Testing of the Xilinx Virtex II FPGA”, MAPLD, 2002.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Velazco, S. Rezgui, R. Ecoffet, “Predicting error rate for microprocessor-based digital architectures through C.E.U. (Code Emulating Upsets) injection”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 47, No 6, part 3, Dec. 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Lesea, S. Drimer, J. Fabula, C. Carmichael, P. Alfke, “The Rosetta experiment: Atmospheric soft error rate testing in differing technology FPGAs”, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability, Vol. 5, No 3, September 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Lesea, “Continuing Experiments of Atmospheric Neutron Effects on Deep Submicron Integrated Circuits”, Xilinx WP286, March 10, 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TIMA LabsGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations