Access to terminological ontologies

  • Javier Lacasta
  • Javier Nogueras-Iso
  • Francisco Javier Zarazaga-Soria
Chapter
Part of the Semantic Web and Beyond book series (ADSW, volume 9)

Abstract

Typical information infrastructures manage different terminological ontologies with a very different levels of specificity, language coverage integrated in their systems (e.g., from monolingual lists of terms to multilingual thesauri covering more than 20 languages), formalization, (e.g., from simple glossaries to well-structured thesauri), or size, (e.g., AGROVOC thesaurus [126] contains more than 16,000 concepts).

Keywords

Europe Tate Editing Adapter Tocol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 8.
    ANSI/NISO (2003). Information Retrieval: Application Service Definition and Protocol Specification. Final draft for review Z39.50, Z39.50 Maintenance Agency. American National Standards Institute (ANSI). http://lcweb.loc.gov/z3950/agency/profiles/collections.html.
  2. 9.
    ANSI/NISO (2005). Guidelines for the Construction, Format, and Management of Monolingual Thesauri. ANSI/NISO Z39.19-2005, American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Revision of Z39.19-1983.Google Scholar
  3. 15.
    Batschi, W.-D., Felluga, B., Legat, R., Plini, P., Stallbaumer, H., and Zirm, K. L. (2002). SuperThes: A New Software for Construction, Maintenance and Visualisation of Multilingual Thesauri. In Proceedings of the Environmental Communication in the Information Society, Vienna.Google Scholar
  4. 19.
    Binding, C. and Tudhope, D. (2004). KOS at your Service: Programmatic Access to Knowledge Organisation Systems. Journal of Digital Information, 4 Issue 4. 26 pages.Google Scholar
  5. 36.
    d’Aquin, M., Baldassarre, C., Gridinoc, L., Sabou, M., Angeletou, S., and Motta, E. (2007). Watson: Supporting next generation semantic web applica- tions. In Proceedings of the WWW/Internet conference, Vila real, Spain.Google Scholar
  6. 39.
    Denny, M. (2002). Ontology building: a Survey of Editing tools. XML.com, November:1-4. http://xml.com/pub/a/2002/11/06/ontologies.html.
  7. 41.
    Ding, L., Finin, T., Joshi, A., Peng, Y., Cost, R. S., Sachs, J., Pan, R., Reddi- vari, P., and Doshi, V. (2004). Swoogle: A semantic web search and metadata engine. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.Google Scholar
  8. 50.
    Farquhar, A., Fikes, R., and Rice, J. (1996). The Ontolingua Server: A Tool for Collaborative Ontology Construction. Technical Report KSL 96-26, Stanford University, Knowledge Systems Laboratory.Google Scholar
  9. 82.
    International Organization for Standardization (2002). Codes for the represen- tation of names of languages. ISO 639, International Organization for Standard- ization (ISO). ISO/TC 37/SC 2.Google Scholar
  10. 96.
    Jan ée, G. and Frew, J. (2002). The ADEPT digital library architecture. In Proceedings of the second ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, pages 342 - 350, Portland, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
  11. 97.
    Jan ée, G., Ikeda, S., and Hill, L. L. (2003). The ADL Thesaurus Protocol. Technical report, Alexandria Digital Library Project.Google Scholar
  12. 105.
    Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B., Sirin, E., Cuenca-Grau, B., and Hendler, J. (2005). Swoop: A ’Web’ Ontology Editing Browser. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 4(2):144-153.Google Scholar
  13. 126.
    Lauser, B., Sini, M., Salokhe, G., Keizer, J., and Katz, S. (2006). Agrovoc Web Services: Improved, real-time access to an agricultural thesaurus. Quarterly Bulletin of the International Association of Agricultural Information Specialists (IAALD), 1019-9926(2):79-81.Google Scholar
  14. 130.
    Lieberman, J., editor (2003). OpenGIS Web Services Architecture, v0.3. Number 0.3 in OGC. Open Geospatial Consortium.Google Scholar
  15. 147.
    Nebert, D., editor (2004). Developing Spatial Data Infrastructures: The SDI Cookbook v.2.0. Global Spatial Data Infrastructure (GSDI), http://www.gsdi.org.
  16. 158.
    Noy, N. F., Fergerson, R. W., and Musen, M. A. (2000). Proceedings of the 12th European Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Manage- ment, volume 1937 of Lecture Notes In Computer Science, chapter The knowl- edge model of Prot ég é -2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility, pages 17-32. Springer-Verlag, Juan-les-Pins, France.Google Scholar
  17. 162.
    Palma, R., Haase, P., and In, A. G.-P. . . (2006). Oyster: sharing and re-using ontologies in a peer-to-peer community. In ACM Press, New York, N., editor, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 1009-1010, Edinburgh, Scotland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 180.
    Stock, K., editor (2009). OGC Catalogue Services OWL Application Profile of CSW. Version 0.3.0. Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC).Google Scholar
  19. 191.
    Tudhope, D. and Binding, C. (2005). Towards Terminology Services: ex- periences with a pilot web service thesaurus browser. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Aplications.Google Scholar
  20. 202.
    Volz, R., Oberle, D., Motik, B., and Staab, S. (2003). KAON SERVER - A Semantic Web Management System. In 12th World Wide Web, Alternate Tracks - Practice and Experience, Hungary, Budapest.Google Scholar
  21. 205.
    Whiteside, A., editor (2007). OGC Web Services Common Specification. Version 1.1.0. Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC).Google Scholar
  22. 206.
    Wielemaker, J., Schreiber, G., and Wielinga1, B. (2005). Using Triples for Implementation: The Triple20 Ontology-Manipulation Tool. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), 3729:773-785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Javier Lacasta
    • 1
  • Javier Nogueras-Iso
    • 1
  • Francisco Javier Zarazaga-Soria
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ZaragozaZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations