Skip to main content

A representation framework for terminological ontologies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 787 Accesses

Part of the book series: Semantic Web and Beyond ((ADSW,volume 9))

Abstract

From the different types of ontology models, terminological ontologies are intensively used by libraries, archives, museums and any other registry of information to facilitate the location of stored resources (classification and information retrieval). Historically, terminological models were printed and used as thematic indexes to locate associated resources. The development of new applications have translated them into the computers and made them to evolve quickly. They are domain or application models that contain the terminology required in an area of knowledge for a specific application and along the years, they have proven to be a useful tool to deal with ambiguity problems, providing inter-relation structure and semantics to the terminology used in these systems. Nowadays, there is a great deal of terminological models covering every area of interest and they have become a crucial part of the information retrieval systems of digital libraries, catalogues and any other system where information is searched or presented thematically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agirre, E. and Rigau, G. (1996). Word Sense Disambiguation using Conceptual Density. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling’96), pages 16-22, Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ANSI/NISO (2003). Information Retrieval: Application Service Definition and Protocol Specification. Final draft for review Z39.50, Z39.50 Maintenance Agency. American National Standards Institute (ANSI). http://lcweb.loc.gov/z3950/agency/profiles/collections.html.

  3. ANSI/NISO (2005). Guidelines for the Construction, Format, and Management of Monolingual Thesauri. ANSI/NISO Z39.19-2005, American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Revision of Z39.19-1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. British Standards Institute (1985). Guide to establishment and development of multilingual thesauri. BS 6723, British Standards Institute (BSI).

    Google Scholar 

  5. British Standards Institute (1987). Guide to establishment and development of monolingual thesauri. BS 5723, British Standards Institute (BSI).

    Google Scholar 

  6. British Standards Institute (2007). Structured vocabularies for information retrieval. Guide. BS 8723, British Standards Institute (BSI).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cross, P., Brickley, D., and Koch, T. (2001). RDF Thesaurus Specification. Technical Report 1011, Intitute for Learning and Research Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dewey, M. (1876). A Classification and Subject Index for Cataloguing and Ar- ranging the Books and Pamphlets of a Library (Dewey Decimal Classification). Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Doerr, M. (2001). Semantic Problems of Thesaurus Mapping. Journal of Digital Information, 1, Issue 8(52):1-25.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Ehrig, M. (2007). Ontology Aligment: Bridging the Semantic Gap. Semantic Web and Beyond: Computing for Human Experience. Springer, 1 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heery, R., Johnston, P., Beckett, D., and Rogers, N. (2005). JISC metadata schema registry. In 5th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, page 381.

    Google Scholar 

  12. International Organization for Standardization (1985). Guidelines for the es- tablishment and development of multilingual thesauri. ISO 5964, International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

    Google Scholar 

  13. International Organization for Standardization (1986). Guidelines for the es- tablishment and development of monolingual thesauri. ISO 2788, International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

    Google Scholar 

  14. International Organization for Standardization (2002). Codes for the represen- tation of names of languages. ISO 639, International Organization for Standard- ization (ISO). ISO/TC 37/SC 2.

    Google Scholar 

  15. International Organization for Standardization (2003a). Computer applica- tions in terminology - terminological markup framework. ISO/DIS 16642, Inter- national Organization for Standardization (ISO).

    Google Scholar 

  16. International Organization for Standardization (2003b). Geographic informa- tion - Metadata. ISO 19115:2003, International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

    Google Scholar 

  17. International Organization for Standardization (2003c). Information and doc- umentation - The Dublin Core metadata element set. ISO 15836:2003, Interna- tional Organization for Standardization (ISO).

    Google Scholar 

  18. International Organization for Standardization (2008a). Language resource management lexical markup framework (lmf). ISO FDIS 24613, International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

    Google Scholar 

  19. International Organization for Standardization (2008b). Terminology and other language and content resources computer applications in terminology termbase exchange format specification (tbx). ISO/DIS 30042.2, International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

    Google Scholar 

  20. International Terminology Working Group (1996). Guidelines for Forming Language Equivalents: A Model Based on the Art&Architecture Thesaurus. Technical report, Getty Information Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Isaac, A. and Summers, E., editors (2009). SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Primer. W3C Candidate Recommendation. W3C. http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-primer/.

  22. Jan ée, G., Ikeda, S., and Hill, L. L. (2003). The ADL Thesaurus Protocol. Technical report, Alexandria Digital Library Project.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Matthews, B. M., Wilson, M. D., Miller, K., and Ryssevik, J. (2001). Inter- nationalising data access through LIMBER. In Third international workshop on internationalisation of products and systems.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McIlwaine, I. C. (1998). The Universal Decimal Classification: Some factors concerning its origins, development, and influence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(4):331-339.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McIlwaine, I. C. (2000). The Universal Decimal Classification: A guide to its use. Number P035 in UDC Publication. UDC Publication, 3rd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Miles, A. and Bechhofer, S., editors (2009). SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference. W3C Candidate Recommendation. W3C. http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/.

  27. Miles, A. and Brickley, D., editors (2004). SKOS Mapping Vocabulary Specification. W3C. http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/mapping/spec/2004-11-11.html.

  28. Miles, A., Matthews, B., and Wilson, M. (2005). SKOS Core: Simple Knowl- edge organization for the WEB. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, pages 5-13, Madrid, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nogueras-Iso, J., Zarazaga-Soria, F. J., and Muro-Medrano, P. R. (2005). Ge- ographic Information Metadata for Spatial Data Infrastructures - Resources, In- teroperability and Information Retrieval. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pepper, S., Moore, G. (eds.) (2001). XML Topic Maps (XTM) 1.0. Technical report, http://www.topicmaps.org.

  31. Resnik, P. (1995). Disambiguating noun groupings with respect to WordNet senses. In Proc. of the 3rd Workshop on Very Large Corpora. MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sussna, M. (1993). Word sense disambiguation for free-text indexing using a massive semantic network. In Proc. of the Second International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM-93), Arlington, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tolosana-Calasanz, R., Nogueras-Iso, J., B éjar, R., Muro-Medrano, P. R., and Zarazaga-Soria, F. J. (2006b). Semantic interoperability based on Dublin Core hierarchical one-to-one mappings. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 1(3):183-188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Lacasta .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lacasta, J., Nogueras-Iso, J., Zarazaga-Soria, F.J. (2010). A representation framework for terminological ontologies. In: Terminological Ontologies. Semantic Web and Beyond, vol 9. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6981-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6981-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6980-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6981-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics