The (Im)morality of War

Some Sociological Considerations
  • Edward A. Tiryakian
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)


Though long a subject of consideration by historians, philosophers, and political scientists, the topic of war has only recently become of theoretical concern to sociological analysis. Treating war as a complex interaction process, this essay analyzes three dimensions of war and its bearing to modernity.


Geneva Convention Occupied Territory Extreme Violence Modern Warfare Military Objective 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bar-Tal, D. 1997. “The Monopolization of Patriotism,” PP. 246–270 in Patriotism in the Lives of Individuals and Nations, edited by D. Bar-Tal, and E. Staub. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Billig, M. 1995. Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Bobbitt, P. 2008. Terror and Consent. The Just Wars for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
  4. Collins, J. 2008. For Love of a Soldier. Interviews with Military Families Taking Action Against the Iraq War. Lanham, MD: Lexington/ Rowman& Littlefield.Google Scholar
  5. Collins, R. 2008. Violence. A Micro-Sociological Theory. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Desmond, M. 2007. On the Fireline: Living and Dying with Wildland Firefighters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Friedrich, C. J. 1948. Inevitable Peace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gat, A. 2006. War in Human Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Greenberg, K. J., and J. L. Dratel, eds., Introduction by Anthony Lewis. 2005. The Torture Papers. The Road to Abu Ghraib. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. 1249 pagesGoogle Scholar
  10. Grossman, D. 1996. On Killing. The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  11. Jeffries, V., ed. 2009. Handbook of Public Sociology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  12. Joas, H. 1999. “The Modernity of War: Modernization Theory and the Problem of Violence,” International Sociology 14(4):457–472.Google Scholar
  13. Lankford, A. 2009. Human Killing Machines. Systematic Indoctrination in Iran, Nazi German, Al Qaeda, and Abu Ghraib. Lanham, MD: Lexington/Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  14. Lind, J. 2008. Sorry States. Apologies in International Politics. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Mann, M. 2005. The Dark Side of Democracy. Explaining Ethnic Cleansing.Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Marshall, S. L. A. 1978 (1947). Men Against Fire: the Problem of Battle Command in Future War. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
  17. Martin, A. W., J. D. McCarthy, and C. McPhail, 2009. “Collective Violence: Why Targets Matter,” American Sociological Review 74(5) (October):821–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mayer, J. 2008. The Dark Side. The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned Into a War on American Ideals. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  19. McKeogh, C. 2002. Innocent Civilians. The Morality of Killing in War. Houndmills, Hampshire (UK) and New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  20. Meehan, S. P., with Roger Thompson. 2009. Beyond Duty. Life on the Frontline in Iraq. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Milgram, S. 1974. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  22. Parsons, T., with Renée Fox and Victor Lidz. 1978. “‘The Gift of Life’ and Its Reciprocation,” PP. 264–299 in Action Theory and the Human Condition, edited by T. Parsons. New York: Free Press/Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Robbins, M. S., ed. 2008. Peace not Terror. Leaders of the Antiwar Movement Speak Out Against U.S. Foreign Policy Post 9/11. Lanham, MD: Lexington/Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  24. Sheehan-Miles, C. 2008. “What It Feels to Kill.” pp. 70–86 in Mary Susannah Robbins, Peace not Terror, op. cit. Google Scholar
  25. Slim, H. 2008.Killing Civilians. Method, Madness and Morality in War. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, P. 2005. Why War? The Cutlural Logic of Iraq, the Gulf War, and Suez. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Stiglitz, J., and L. J. Bilmes. 2008.The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  28. Tiryakian, E. A. 1999. “War: The Covered Side of Modernity.” International Sociology 14(4):473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tiryakian, E. A. 2005. “September 11 and the Actuality of Durkheim.” pp. 305–321 in Cambridge Companion of Durkheim, edited by J. Alexander, and P. Smith. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Turner, V. W. 1995 (1966). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  31. Van Emden, R. 2002. Last Man Standing. Norman Collins, The Memoirs of a Seaforth Highlander During the Great War. Barnsley, South Yorkshire (UK): Leo Cooper.Google Scholar
  32. Van Emden, R. 2006. Britain’s Last Tommies. Final Memories from Soldiers of the 1914–1918 War in Their Own Words. Barnsley, South Yorkshire (UK): Pen & Sword Military/Pen and Sword Books.Google Scholar
  33. Woehrle, L., P. G. Coy, and G. M. Maney, 2008. Contesting Patriotism. Culture, Power, and Strategy in the Peace Movement. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  34. Zimbardo, P. 2007. The Lucifer Effect. How Good People Turn Evil. London: Rider.Google Scholar
  35. Zinn, H. 2008. “What War Looks Like.” PP. 51–54 in Peace not Terror, edited by M. S. Robbins. op.cit. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations