Abstract
I am pretty widely characterized (by others) as a “post-processual” archaeologist, more specifically (an identification I actually agree with), as a feminist archaeologist. So what am I doing, enthusiastically endorsing the idea that the future of archaeology requires us to integrate archaeological science even more fully into our practice and explanations than we have been doing in recent decades in archaeology? Without obscuring my actual lack of direct experience in the application of XRF, which I still admit to treating like a kind of magic, I want to make two arguments in this chapter, explaining why archaeologists like me should encourage the cultivation of expertise in archaeological science, and why archaeological scientists should find what I personally prefer to call “social archaeology,” a congenial place to spend time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bauer, A. (2002), Is What You See What You Get? Recognizing Meaning in Archaeology. Journal of Social Archaeology 2, 37–52.
Demattè, P. (2006), The Chinese Jade Age: Between Antiquarianism and Archaeology. Journal of Social Archaeology 6, 202–226.
Haslam, M. (2006), An Archaeology of the Instant? Action and Narrative in Microscopic Archaeological Residue Analysis. Journal of Social Archaeology 6, 402–424.
Jones, A. (2004), Archaeometry and Materiality: Materials-Based Analysis in Theory and Practice. Archaeometry 46, 327–338.
Jones, A. (2005), Lives in Fragments? Personhood and the European Neolithic. Journal of Social Archaeology 5, 193–224.
Joyce, R. A. (2007), Figurines, meaning, and meaning-making in early Mesoamerica. In C. Renfrew and I. Morley, Eds., Material Beginnings: A Global Prehistory of Figurative Representation, (pp. 107–116). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Joyce, R. A. (2008), Practice in and as deposition. In B. Mills and W. Walker, Eds,, Memory Work, (pp. 25–40). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
Journal of Social Archaeology Editors (2001), Editorial Statement. Journal of Social Archaeology 1, 5–12.
Keane, W. (2008), On the Materiality of Religion. Material Religion 4, 230–231.
Killick, D. (2004), Social Constructionist Approaches to the Study of Technology. World Archaeology 36, 571–578.
Knappett, C. (2002), Photographs, Skeumorphs and Marionettes: some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object. Journal of Material Culture 7, 97–117.
Lele, V. P. (2006), Material Habits, Identity, Semeiotic. Journal of Social Archaeology 6, 48–70.
Pollard, A. M., and Bray, P. (2007), A Bicycle Made for Two? The Integration of Scientific Techniques in Archaeological Interpretation. Annual Review of Anthropology 36, 245–259.
Preucel, R. W. (1995), The Postprocessual Condition. Journal of Archaeological Research 3, 147–175.
Preucel, R. W. (2005), Archaeological Semiotics. Malden: Blackwell.
Preucel, R. W. and Bauer, A. (2001), Archaeological Pragmatics. Norwegian Archaeological Review 34, 85–96.
Robin, C. (2002), Outside of Houses: The Practices of Everyday Life at Chan Nòohol, Belize. Journal of Social Archaeology 2, 245–268.
Sillar, B., and Tite, M. S. (2000), The Challenge of “Technological Choices” for Materials Science Approaches in Archaeology. Archaeometry 42, 2–20.
Silliman, S. (2001), Agency, Practical Politics, and the Archaeology of Culture Contact. Journal of Social Archaeology 1, 190–209.
Wallis, N. J. (2008), Networks of History and Memory: Creating a Nexus of Social Identities in Woodland Period Mounds on the Lower St. Johns River, Florida. Journal of Social Archaeology 8, 236–271.
White, C. D. (2005). Gendered Food Behaviour Among the Maya: Time, Place, Status and Ritual. Journal of Social Archaeology 5, 356–382.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Joyce, R.A. (2011). Is There a Future for XRF in Twenty-First Century Archaeology?. In: Shackley, M. (eds) X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (XRF) in Geoarchaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6886-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6886-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6885-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6886-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)