Factors Affecting the Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) Analysis of Archaeological Obsidian

  • M. Kathleen Davis
  • Thomas L. Jackson
  • M. Steven Shackley
  • Timothy Teague
  • Joachim H. Hampel
Chapter

Abstract

Non-destructive XRF analysis of obsidian artifacts presents unique challenges for quantitative trace element characterization. These empirical tests of the effects of sample size and surface configuration allow estimation of minimum size requirements for different analyses. The results also show that errors resulting from surface irregularities are usually insignificant relative to other errors in the analysis.

Keywords

TiO2 Barium Geophysics Weathering Rhodium 

References

  1. Bouey, P., (1991), Recognizing the limits of archaeological applications of non-destructive energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis of obsidians. Materials Research Society Proceedings 185, 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Davis, M.K., (1994), Bremsstrahlung ratio technique applied to the non-destructive energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis of obsidian. International Association for Obsidian Studies Bulletin 11.Google Scholar
  3. Franzini, M., Leoni, L., and Saitta M., (1976), Determination of the X-ray fluorescence mass absorption coefficient by measurement of the intensity of Ag Kα Compton scattered radiation. X-ray Spectrometry 5:84–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Govindaraju, K., (1989), 1989 Compilation of working values and sample description for 272 geostandards. Geostandards Newsletter 13 (special issue).Google Scholar
  5. Jenkins, R., Gould, R.W., and Gedcke, D., (1981), Quantitative X-ray Spectrometry. New York: Marcel DekkerGoogle Scholar
  6. Hughes, R.E., (1984), Obsidian source studies in the Great Basin: Problems and Prospects. In Hughes, R.E., Ed., Obsidian Studies in the Great Basin, (pp. 1–20). Berkeley: Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 45.Google Scholar
  7. Hughes RE (1988), The Coso Volcanic field reexamined: implications for obsidian sourcing and hydration dating research. Geoarchaeology 3:253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jackson, T.L. and Hampel, J.H., (1992), Size effects in the energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) analysis of archaeological obsidian artifacts. Presented at the 28th International Symposium on Archaeometry, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  9. McCarthy, J.J. and Schamber, F.H., (1981), Least-squares fit with digital filter: a status report. In Heinrich, K.F.J., Newbury, D.E., Myklebust, R.L. and Fiori, E. Eds., Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry, (pp. 273–296). Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 604.Google Scholar
  10. Schamber, F.H., (1977), A modification of the linear least-squares fitting method which provides continuum suppression. In Dzubay, T.G., Ed., X-ray Fluorescence Analysis of Environmental Samples, (pp. 241–257). Ann Arbor: Ann Arbor Science.Google Scholar
  11. Shackley MS (1988), Sources of archaeological obsidian in the Southwest: an archaeological, petrological, and geochemical study. American Antiquity 53:752–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shackley,M.S. and Hampel, J., (1992), Surface effects in the energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) analysis of archaeological obsidian. Presented at the 28th International Symposium on Archaeometry, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  13. Tatlock, D.B., Flanagan, F.J., Bastron, H., Berman, S., and Sutton, A.L. Jr., (1976), Rhyolite, RGM-1, from Glass Mountain, California. In Flanagan, F.J., Ed., Descriptions and Analyses of Eight New USGS Rock Standards. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 850, (pp. 11–14).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Kathleen Davis
  • Thomas L. Jackson
  • M. Steven Shackley
    • 1
  • Timothy Teague
  • Joachim H. Hampel
  1. 1.Far Western Anthropological Research GroupDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations