Workforce Development in the United States: Key Legislative Initiatives and the Roles of the Private and Nonprofit Sectors

  • Burt S. Barnow
  • Stefan Toepler
Part of the Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies book series (NCSS)

Abstract

As in many other policy arenas, there is no comprehensive, overall system in place in the United States that guides the variety of existing workforce development programs and measures. Programs tend to emerge in response to specific needs and issues and are frequently tailored towards specific components of the population, such as displaced workers, unemployed youth, welfare recipients, or persons generally living in highly economically distressed areas. This approach has essentially remained unchanged despite various Congressional efforts over the past three decades to pass legislation in this area that would consolidate many — if not most — of the diverse, pre-existing programs. These efforts have included the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) of 1973, the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) of 1982, as well as the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) of 1998.

Keywords

Depression Europe Income Arena Larg 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bamow, Burt S. (1993). “Thirty Years of Changing Federal, State, and Local Relationships in Employment and Training Programs,” Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 23 (3).Google Scholar
  2. Bamow, Burt S. (1999), “Job Creation for Low-Wage Workers: An Assessment of Public Service Jobs, Tax Credits, and Empowerment Zones.” In Urban Institute (ed.), The Low-Wage Labor Market: Challenges and Opportunities for Economic Self-Sufficiency Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [http://www.aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/lwlm99]Google Scholar
  3. Barrow, Burt S., Michael Bell, and Shayne Spaulding (2001). Workforce Development in Baltimore: A Survey of Vendors/Providers (mimeo). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Barrow, Burt S., Michael Bell, Shayne Spaulding, and Jason Shultz (2001). Workforce Development in Baltimore: Catalogue of Funding Stream Programs (mimeo). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  5. Barnow, Burt S. and Christopher T. King (eds.) (2000). Improving the Odds: Increasing the Effectiveness of Publicly Funded Training. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dewees, Sarah and Lester M. Salamon (forthcoming). A Time of Change: Findings from the 1997 Economic Census Unpublished manuscript. Baltimore, Md.: Center for Civil Society Studies, Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  7. GAO (2000). Multiple Employment and Training Programs: Overlapping Programs Indicate Need for Closer Examination of Structure Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. [Available online at www.gao.gov/new.items/d0171.pdf]Google Scholar
  8. Hall, Peter D. (1994). Historical Perspectives on Nonprofit Organisations. In R. Herman (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass Handbook of Nonprofit Leadership and Management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 3–43.Google Scholar
  9. Heinrich, Carolyn J. (2000). “Organisational Form and Performance: An Empirical Investigation of Nonprofit and For-Profit Job-Training Service Providers.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19 (2), 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heinrich, Carolyn J. and L. E. Lynn (1999). Governance and Performance: The Influence of Program Structures and Management on Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) Program Outcomes. (Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies Working Paper 99. 2 ). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, George and James Tomola (1977). “The Fiscal Substitution Effect of Alternative Approaches to Public Service Employment Policy.” Journal of Human Resources, 12 (1).Google Scholar
  12. Kesselman, Jonathan R. (1978). “Work Relief Programs in the Great Depression,” in John L. Palmer (ed.), Creating Jobs: Public Employment Programs and Wage Subsidies. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  13. O’Leary, Christopher J. and Robert A. Straits (2000). Intergovernmental Relations in Employment Policy: The United States Experience. (Upjohn Institute Staff Working Paper 00–60 ). Kalamazoo: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
  14. OMB (1987). Standard Industrial Classification Manual. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget.Google Scholar
  15. Salamon, Lester M. (1993). “The Marketization of Welfare: Changing Nonprofit and For- profit Roles in the American Welfare State.” Social Service Review, 67 (1), 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Salamon, Lester M. (1995). Partners in Public Service: Government/Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Salamon, Lester M., Anheier, Helmut K., List, Regina, Toepler, Stefan, and Sokolowski, Wojciech (1999). Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.Google Scholar
  18. Weisbrod, B. (1997). “The Future of the Nonprofit Sector: Its Entwining with Private Enterprise and Government.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(4), 541–555.Google Scholar
  19. Weisbrod (ed.) (1998). To Profit or Not to profit? The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Burt S. Barnow
  • Stefan Toepler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations