Processing Information and Data

  • Pamela Elizabeth Clark
  • Michael Lee Rilee


Tracking and processing information in all forms is essential at every stage of a remote sensing project. Increasingly sophisticated processing capabilities have been both driven by remote sensing requirements and a driving force behind the development of remote sensing. In fact, due to the large volume of information and the large number and complexity of steps involved in transforming it, sophisticated data handling capabilities became an absolute necessity for remote sensing long ago. Thus, computer science and engineering have played major roles in remote sensing.


Deep Space Carrier Wave Open Geospatial Consortium Technological Readiness Level Planetary Data System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acton C (1996) Ancillary data services of NASA’s navigation and Ancillary Information Facility, Space Science, 44, 65-70, 1996. Google Scholar
  2. Allemang, D. and J. Hendler, Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist, Morgan Kaufmann. 2008. Google Scholar
  3. Allison, J., Geant4 Developments and Applications, IEEE Trans. on Nucl. Sci., 53, 1, 2006. Google Scholar
  4. Amsler, C. and 169 others, Particle Data Group, Physics Letters B667, 1, 2008. Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, P.B., Map Projections,, Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science (CSISS), accessed 2009. Google Scholar
  6. Andzik, R., G. Chaudhri, B. KizzortUtilizing Focused Standards as Building Blocks for Satellite Control, presented at Ground Systems Architecture Workshop (GSAW), Torrance, California, U.S., 2009. Google Scholar
  7. Ang, A. and W. Tang, Statistical Inferences from Observational Data, in Probability Concepts in Engineering: Emphasis on Applications in Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 245-277, 2007. Google Scholar
  8. Ashish, N., “NASA and the Semantic Web”, presented at the Dagstuhl Seminar on Semantic Interoperability and Integration, Dagstuhl Germany, Sep 2004 Google Scholar
  9. Ashour-Abdalla, M. P. Pritchett, D. Schriver Active electron and ion beam experiments in space. Final Report, 18 Feb. 1988 -31 Dec. 1992, UCLA, Inst. of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, 1993. Google Scholar
  10. Balakrishnan, N., and V. B. Nevzorov, A Primer on Statistical Distributions, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2003. Google Scholar
  11. Barrington, R.E. and Belrose, J.S., Nature, 198, 651, 1963. Google Scholar
  12. Benedict G.F., B. McArthur, E. Nelan, D. Story, A.L. Whipple, W. Jeffreys, Q. Wang, P. Shelus, Google Scholar
  13. P. Hemenway, J. McCartney, W. van Altena, R. Duncombe, O. Franz, L. Fredrick Astrometry with Hubble Space Telescope Fine Guidance Sensor Number 3: Position-Mode Stability and Precision, Publ. Astronomical Soc. of the Pacific, 106, 327-336, 1994. Google Scholar
  14. Berners-Lee, T., J. Hendler, and O. LassilaThe Semantic Web, Scientific American, 284, 5, 3443, 2001. Google Scholar
  15. Boardsen, S.A. and R.L. Kessel, Spin Index Determination of the Hawkeye Spacecraft, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 39, 5, 780-787, 2002. Google Scholar
  16. Bose, T., Digital Signal and Image Processing, John Wiley & Sons, 2004. Google Scholar
  17. Boulet, B., Fundamentals of Signals and Systems, Da Vinci Engineering Press, 2006. Google Scholar
  18. Brown, C.D., “Command and Data System” and "Telecommunication". Elements of Spacecraft Design. AIAA, 409-502, 2002. Google Scholar
  19. Campbell, J.P., L.C. Yu, K.P. Cheung, J. Quinn, J.S. Suehle, A. Oates, and K. Sheng, Large Random Telegraph Noise in Sub-Threshold Operation of Nano-scale nMOSFETs, IEEE International Conference on Integrated Circuit Design and Technology, Austin, Texas,19 May 2009; and Random Telegraph Noise in Highly Scaled nMOSFETs, 2009 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, Montreal, Canada, 29 April 2009. Google Scholar
  20. Campbell, J.P., L.C. Yu, K.P. Cheung, J. Quinn, J.S. Suehle, A. Oates, and K. Sheng Random Telegraph Noise in highly scaled nMOSFETs, IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, Montreal, Canada, 29 April 2009. Google Scholar
  21. Chapra, S., R. CanaleNumerical Methods for Engineers. 5th ed. McGraw Hill, New York, 960pp, 2005. Cheeseman, P. and J. StutzBayesian Classification (AutoClass): Theory and Results, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 153-180, 1996.Google Scholar
  22. Cheney, E., D. Kincaid Numerical mathematics and computing, 5th ed.Thomson-Brooks/Cole, Belmont, 817pp, 2004. Christiansen, D., C. Alexander, and R.K. Jurgen, Standard Handbook of Electronic Engineering, 5th Edition, McGraw-Hill Engineering, 2005. 6. Processing Information and Data Google Scholar
  23. Clark P.E., E. Eliason, C. Andre, I. Adler A New Color Correlation Method applied to XRF Al/Si Ratios and Other Lunar Remote Data, Proc. 9th Lun. Plan. Sci. Conf., 3015-3207, 1978. Google Scholar
  24. Clark P.E, B.R. HawkeCompositional Variation in the Hadley Apennine Region, Proc. 12th Lun. Plan. Sci. Conf., 727-750, 1981. Google Scholar
  25. Clark P.E., B.R. HawkeThe Relationship Between Geology and Geochemistry in the Undarum/Spumans/Balmer Region of the Moon, Earth, Moon, and Planets 38, 97-112, 1987. Google Scholar
  26. Clark P.E., B.R. HawkeThe lunar farside: the nature of highlands east of Mare Smythii, Earth, Moon, and Planets, 53, 93-107, 1991. Google Scholar
  27. Clauset, A., C.R. Shalizi, and M.E.J. Newman, Power-law distributions in empirical data. arXiv:0706.1062, SIAM Reviews, 2009. Google Scholar
  28. CCSDS2006, cf.; XML Telemetric and Command Exchange (XTCE) “Green Book,” CCSDS 660.0-G-1, The Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems, 2006. Google Scholar
  29. Cressie, N.A., Statistics for Spatial Data, Wiley Interscience, New York, 900pp, 1993. Google Scholar
  30. Cybenko, G., Approximation by Superposition of a Sigmoidal Function, Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, 2, 303-14, 1989. Google Scholar
  31. Dana, P.H., The Geographer’s Craft Project, Department of Geography, The University of Colorado at Boulder, notes/mapproj/ mapproj_f.htmlaccessed June 2009, 1999. Google Scholar
  32. Di L., P. Zhao , W. Yang and P. Yue, Ontology-driven Automatic Geospatial-Processing Model¬ing based on Web-service Chaining, Proceedings of the Sixth Annual NASA Earth Science Technology Conference, College Park, MD, US, 27-29 June 2006. Google Scholar
  33. Dutra, J., and L. Smith, Strategic plan: providing high precision search to NASA employees using the NASA engineering network, NASA Knowledge Management Conference, 2 March 2006, Houston, TX, United States,, 2006. Google Scholar
  34. El-Sheimy, N., C. Valeo, and A. Habib, Digital Terrain Modeling: Acquisition, Manipulation, and Applications, Artech House, Norwood, MA, 270pp, 2005. Google Scholar
  35. Ellwood, J., H. Wartenberg, J-F. Clervoy, F. Castel, A. NovelliCome H Jules Verne’s journey from Earth to ISS – ESA’s first space ferry, ESA Bulletin 136, European Space Agency, Belgium, 2008. Google Scholar
  36. Fayez, M., D. Cope, A. Kaylani, M. Callinan, E. Zapata, M. MollaghesemiEarth to orbit logistics and supply chain modeling and simulation for NASA exploration systems, in Proceedings of the IEEE 38th Winter Simulation Conference, Perrone L.F., F. Wieland, J. Liu, B. Lawson, Google Scholar
  37. D. Nicol, R. Fujimoto, eds., Piscataway, 2006. Fehse, W., The Onboard Rendezvous Control System, in Automated Rendezvous and Docking of Spacecraft, Cambridge University Press, 171-217, 2003. Filippone, M., F. Camastra, F. Masulli, S. Rovetta, "A survey of kernel and spectral methods for clustering," Pattern Recognition, 41, 1, 176-190, 2008. Google Scholar
  38. Frigeri, A., C. Federico, C. Pauselli, and G. Minelli, Procedures for using Geographic Information Systems for the handling and processing of scientific data from the planetary surfaces, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplement, 11, 103, 2007. Google Scholar
  39. Furuti, C., Map Projections,, 1997. Google Scholar
  40. Goebel, J., K Volk, H. Walker, F. Gerbault, P. Cheeseman, M. Self, J. Stutz, W. TaylorA Bayesian classification of the IRAS LRS Atlas, Astronomy and Astrophysics 222, L5-L8, 1989. Google Scholar
  41. Gershenfeld, N.The Nature of Mathematical Modeling, Cambridge University Press, 344 pp, 1999. Google Scholar
  42. Gray, R.M. and L. D. Davisson, An Introduction to Statistical Signal Processing, Cambridge University Press, 2004. Google Scholar
  43. Gregory, P.C., Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences, Cambridge University Press, 2005. Google Scholar
  44. GIS, 1995, Understanding GIS, Environmental Systems Research Institute, 1995. Google Scholar
  45. Griffin, M.D. and French, J.R., Spacecraft Environment, in Space Vehicle Design, AIAA, 49 102, 2004. Google Scholar
  46. Hare, T.M. and L. Plesea, Planetary GIS Updates for 2007, 39th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 39, 2536, 2008. Google Scholar
  47. Hodgson, R., P. Keller, H. KnublauchOntology-Based XML Schemas for Interoperability between Systems and Tools, Proceedings of XML Conference, Accessed 2009, 2006. Google Scholar
  48. Hudson, R., “Optical Modulation". Infrared System Engineering. John Wiley & Sons., 235-263, 2006. Google Scholar
  49. Hughes, J.S., D. Crichton, C. Mattmann A Framework to Manage Information Models --The Planetary Data System Case Study, 40th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 40, 1139, 2009. Google Scholar
  50. Imbriale, W.A. and D.L. Jones, Radio-Telescope Antennas. in Antenna Engineering Handbook, Fourth Edition, Volakis, J.L., editor, McGraw-Hill, 49-1, 2007. Google Scholar
  51. Jackson, M., D. Schell, and D.R.F. Taylor, The Evolution of Geospatial Technology Calls for Changes in Geospatial Research, Education and Government Management, Directions Magazine,, Accessed 2010, 2009. Google Scholar
  52. Jähne, B., Digital Image Processing, 6th Revised and Extended Edition. Springer, 2005. Google Scholar
  53. Jain, A. K., Murty, M. N., and Flynn, P. J., Data clustering: a review, ACM Comput. Surv. 31, 3, 264-323, 1999. Google Scholar
  54. Jankiraman, M., Design of Multi-Frequency CW Radars, SciTech, Raleigh, 351pp, 2007. Google Scholar
  55. Jensen J., S. Schill Introductory Digital Image Processing, Volume 3, Remote Sensing Core 1972 Curriculum, rslab/Rscc/rscc-no-frames.html. Accessed 2009, 2009. Google Scholar
  56. Johnson, S.P. NOAA Sponsored 2005-2015 International Remote Sensing Research Overview Paper Number: 1045, 2006 ESRI International User Conference Proceedings, 2006. Google Scholar
  57. Johnson, S.P. NOAA Sponsored Asian Remote Sensing Research Study 2006-2016, 2007 ESRI International User Conference Proceedings, 1069, 2007. Google Scholar
  58. Kaercher, H.J., Evolution of the SOFIA Telescope system design: lessons learned during design and manufacturing, in Airborne telescope systems II, Melugin, R., H. Roser, Eds., SPIE, Bellingham, 4857-26, 257-265, 2003. Google Scholar
  59. Kletzing C.A., R. Ergun, R. Torbert, J. Burch, S. Bounds, M. Hesse, B. Mauk, T. Moore, D. YoungBurst Memory and Event Trigger System for the Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission, 2005 Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union, SM23A-0397, 2005. Google Scholar
  60. Kogan, J., Introduction to Clustering Large and High-Dimensional Data, Cambridge University Press, 205pp, 2007. Google Scholar
  61. Komolgorov, A.N., On the Representation of Continuous Functions of Several Variables by Superposition of Continuous Functions of One Variable and Addition, Doklady Akademeiia Nauk SSSR, 114, 953-6, 1957. Google Scholar
  62. Koza, J., Genetic Programming: On the programming of computers by means of natural selection, MIT Press, Boston, 819pp, 1992. Google Scholar
  63. Kriegel, H.-P., P. Kroger, A. ZimekClustering high-dimensional data: A survey on subspace clustering, pattern-based clustering, and correlation clustering, Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 3, 1, 2009. Google Scholar
  64. Lai, S.T., and M.F. Tautz, Aspects of Spacecraft Charging in Sunlight, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 34, 2053, 2006. Google Scholar
  65. Landgrebe, D., Signal Theory Methods in Multi-spectral Remote Sensing, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 508pp, 2003. Google Scholar
  66. Lary, D. and Mussa, H. , Using an extended Kalman filter learning algorithm for feed-forward neural networks to describe tracer correlations, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 4, 3653-3667, 2004. Google Scholar
  67. Leary, W.E., Robot ship cleared to dock at space station, New York Times, 2 April 2008. Google Scholar
  68. Lesh, J.R., Chapter 1, in Deep Space Optical Communications, Hemmati, H., Ed. John Wiley & Sons, 1-82, 2006. Google Scholar
  69. Maly, J. R., B.B. Reed, M.J. Viens, B.H. Parker, S.C. Pendleton, Life cycle testing of viscoelastic materials for Hubble Space Telescope solar array 3 damper in Smart Structures and 6. Processing Information and Data Google Scholar
  70. Materials 2003: Damping and Isolation, G.S. Agnes, K.-W. Wang, editors, Proceedings of the SPIE, 5052, 128-140, 2003. Google Scholar
  71. McClanahan, T.P. and NEAR XGRS Team, Data processing for the Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous (NEAR), X-ray and Gamma-ray Spectrometer (XGRS) ground system, in Conference on Hard X-Ray, Gamma-Ray, and Neutron Detector Physics, Denver, Colorado, SPIE, Bellingham, 3768, 1999. Google Scholar
  72. McClaning, K., and T. Vito, Radio Receiver Design, SciTech, Noble, Atlanta, 778pp, 2000. Google Scholar
  73. McMahon, S.K., Overview of the Planetary Data System, Planetary and Space Science, 44, 3, 1996. Google Scholar
  74. Mitola III, J., Software Radio Architecture, John Wiley & Sons, 543pp, 2000. Google Scholar
  75. Moore, R.W., National Virtual Observatory Architecture, P.J. Quinn and K.M. Górski, editors, ESO Symposia: Toward an International Virtual Observatory, Springer, Berlin, New York, 67-74, 2004. Google Scholar
  76. NRC, Sounding Rockets:Their Role in Space Research, Space Studies Board, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 1969. Google Scholar
  77. NRC, Building a Better NASA Workforce:Meeting the Workforce Needs for the National Vision for Space Exploration, Space Studies Board and the Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, The National Research Council, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2007. Google Scholar
  78. NSRPH, NASA Sounding Rocket Program Handbook, 1999. Google Scholar
  79. NSRP, NASA Sounding Rockets Program 2008 Annual Report, 2008. Google Scholar
  80. Nguyen, D. H., L.M. Skladany, B.D. Pratts, Thermal Performance of the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Solar Array-3 during the Disturbance Verification Test (DVT) Fourth International Symposium Environmental Testing for Space Programmes, June 12-14, 2001, Palais de Congrès, Liège, Belgium, Brigitte Schürmann, editor, European Space Agency, ESA SP-467, 165, 2001. Google Scholar
  81. OGC, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., http://www.opengeospatial. org/, accessed June 2009. Park, H., R. Mackey, M. James, M. Zak, E. Baroth BEAM: technology for autonomous vehicle health monitoring, 2nd JANNAF Modeling and Simulation Subcommittee Meeting, 2002. Google Scholar
  82. Planetary Data System (PDS) Imaging Node,, accessed 2009. Google Scholar
  83. PDSTools: NASAView, accessed June 2009. The SPICE Toolkit,, accessed June 2009.Integrated Software for Imagers and Spectrometers (ISIS), USGS,, accessed June 2009. Google Scholar
  84. Press, W., S. Teukolsky, W. Vetterling, B. Flannery Numerical Recipes, Cambridge University, 2007. Google Scholar
  85. Ransone, E.D. and D.D. Gregory, An overview of the NASA Sounding Rockets and Balloon Programs, 17th ESA Symposium on European Rocket and Balloon Programmes and Related Research, Sandefford, Norway, 30 May – 2 June 2005, ESA SP-590, 19, 2005. Google Scholar
  86. Raskin. R., SWEET 2.0: Moving Toward Community-Based Ontologies, 2008 Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union, #IN11B-1027, 2008. Google Scholar
  87. Rönnmark, K., Quantitative Methods for Waves in Space Plasmas, Space Science Reviews, 54, 1-2, 1-73, 1990. Google Scholar
  88. Schiek, B., I. Rolfes, and H.-J. Siweris, Noise in High-Frequency Circuits and Oscillators, John Wiley & Sons, 2006. Google Scholar
  89. Schreier, R., and G.C. Temes, Understanding Delta-Sigma Data Converters, IEEE Press, Wiley, Hoboken, 2005. Google Scholar
  90. Sessler, G.M.A., R. Abello, N. James, R. Madde, E. VassalloGMSK Demodulator Implementation for ESA Deep-Space Missions, Proceedings of the IEEE, 95, 11, 2132-2141, 2007. Google Scholar
  91. Sherwood R., A. Schlutsmeyer, M. Sue, E. WyattAerospace Conference Proceedings, IEEE, Piscataway, 2:377-387, 2000. Google Scholar
  92. Shishko, R., The application of architecture frameworks to modeling exploration operations costs, 16th Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), Orlando, FL, United States, 8-14 July 2006. Google Scholar
  93. SOHO Mission Interruption Joint NASA/ESA Investigation Board Final Report, M. Trella and Google Scholar
  94. M. Greenfield, Co-chairs, 31 August 1998. Sinha, A., K. Lin, R. Raskin, C. Barnes, D. McGuinness, J. Najdi: Empowering new Discoveries in Earth Sciences, Fall Meeting 2005, #IN41B-04, American Geophysical Union, 2005. Smith, R.B., Introduction to Map Projections, Microimages.Inc., http://www. (accessed July 2009). Sze, S. M. and K.K. Ng., Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 2007. Sze, S.M., Semiconductor Devices: Physics and Technology, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 2002. Tanaka, K., The NASA/USGS Planetary Geologic Mapping Program, European Planetary Google Scholar
  95. Science Congress 2006, Berlin, Germany, 354, 2006. Google Scholar
  96. Thompson J.R. Empirical Model Building. Wiley, NY, 242 pp, 1989. Google Scholar
  97. Timmer, J. and M. König, On generating power law noise, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 300, 707, 1995. Google Scholar
  98. Tokhi, O. and S. Veres (Eds), Active Sound and Vibration Control: Theory and Applications, IET, 2002. Google Scholar
  99. Torkar, K., M. Fehringer, C. Escoubet, M. Andre, A. Pederson, K. Svenes, P. DecreauAnalysis of Cluster spacecraft potential during active control, Advances in Space Research, 36, 1922, 2005. Google Scholar
  100. Trella M, Greenfield M, Co-chairs (1998) SOHO mission interruption joint NASA/ESA investigation board final report, 1998. Google Scholar
  101. Weisstein, E., Map Projection, from MathWorld-A Wolfram Web Resource, http://mathworld,, accessed August 2009. Google Scholar
  102. Whipple, E.C., Potentials of surfaces in space, Reports on Progress in Physics, 44, 1197, 1981. Google Scholar
  103. Wie, B., Space vehicle dynamics and control, AIAA, 1998. Google Scholar
  104. Wyatt, E., Lessons from Implementation of Beacon Spacecraft Operations on Deep Space One, IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2000. Google Scholar
  105. Zhong, S., Efficient Online Spherical K-means Clustering, Proc. IEEE Int. Joint Conf. Neural Networks (IJCNN 2005), Montreal, Canada, July 31-August 4, 3180-3185, 2005. Google Scholar
  106. Zurbuchen, T.H., statement before the Aerospace States Association, Capitol Hill Hearing on STEM Education, Aviation, and Space, 9 March 2009 and, http://www.usra. edu/galleries/defaultfile/whitepaper.pdf, accessed June 2009. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physics Department NASA/GSFC Code 695.0Catholic University of AmericaGreenbeltUSA
  2. 2.Rilee Systems Technologies LLCHerndonUSA

Personalised recommendations