Principles of Remote Sensing

  • Pamela Elizabeth Clark
  • Michael Lee Rilee


Instruments available today, whether in the laboratory, in situ (observing instrument close to target in a natural, remote location), or remote in every way (observing instrument distant from target in natural, remote location), are elaborate and sophisticated extensions of the most ancient and venerable remote sensing devices: binocular human vision. The eyes, probably the most sensitive organs, can sense only a small portion of the electromagnetic spectrum-the visual-but the brain can then interpret this information in many ways: as brightness or color, yielding compositional information, and as shape, orientation, or perspective, yielding morphological or structural information. The ears act in similar fashion, providing information that can be interpreted in terms of sonic frequency spectrum and direction of a source.


Remote Sensing Wave Model Data Fusion Black Body Radiation Electromagnetic Spectrum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Campbell, J., Introduction to Remote Sensing, 4th Edition, Guilford Press, 626 p., 2006. Google Scholar
  2. Clark P.E., McFadden L., New results and implications for lunar crustal iron distribution using sensor data fusion techniques. JGR Planets, 105(E2): 4291–4316, 2000. Google Scholar
  3. Compton, R., Geology in the Field, Wiley, New York, 416 p., 1985. Google Scholar
  4. Elachi, C. and A. van Zyl, Introduction to the Physics and Techniques of Remote Sensing, 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 413 p., 2006. Google Scholar
  5. Feinberg, G., Light, in The Surveillant Science: Remote Sensing, R.H. Kolz, ed., New York, Houghton Mifflin, 1973. Google Scholar
  6. Jensen, J., Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective, 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, New York, 608 p., 2006. Google Scholar
  7. Lillesand, R., R. Kiefer, J. and Chipman, Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, Wiley, New York, 784 p., 2003. Google Scholar
  8. Remote Sensing, R.H. Kolz, ed., New York, Houghton Mifflin, 1973. Google Scholar
  9. Siegal, B. and A. Gillespie, Remote Sensing in Geology, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 702 p., 1980. Google Scholar
  10. Sabins, F., Remote Sensing: Principles and Interpretation, 2nd Edition, Freeman, San Francisco, 432 p., 1996. Google Scholar
  11. Short, N., The remote sensing tutorial (rst),, 2007. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physics Department NASA/GSFC Code 695.0Catholic University of AmericaGreenbeltUSA
  2. 2.Rilee Systems Technologies LLCHerndonUSA

Personalised recommendations