Protected Land pp 115-127 | Cite as

Grassland Ecosystems

Part of the Springer Series on Environmental Management book series (SSEM)


The ecosystems that we protect were forged by a long history of disturbance, stress, and response. In some ecosystems the disturbance and stress regimes have been harsher than others. Frequent, intense disruption can make a place nonviable for many species, as can severe and prolonged physiological limitations. As a ­consequence, we see simpler ecosystems in conditions of extreme disturbance and stress. The organisms that inhabit such ecosystems manage to exist as they do because they are in some way tolerant to the stress, adapted to the disturbance regime, and/or highly specialized to exploit some particular resource. The community- and system-level features of such environments consequently include some unique and fragile associations. When the disturbance regime changes abruptly, or when new stress is imposed, the former associations can rapidly dissolve, to be replaced by a new community as time and conditions allow.


Conservation Reserve Program Leafy Spurge Land Trust Umbrella Species Shortgrass Prairie 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anderson, R. 1973. The use of fire as a management tool on the Curtis Prairie. Proceedings, 12th Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference, June 8–9, 1972, Lubbock, TX. Tallahassee: Tall Timbers Research Station.Google Scholar
  2. Cottam, G., and Wilson, H. 1966. Community dynamics on an artificial prairie. Ecology 47:88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Curtis, J., and Partch, M. 1948. Effect of fire on the competition between blue grass and certain prairie plants. American Midland Naturalist 39:437–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guest, B. 1968. The Cimarron National Grassland: a study in land use adjustment. Journal of Range Management 21:167–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hurt, R. 1985. The national grasslands: origin and development in the dust bowl. Agricultural History 59:246–259.Google Scholar
  6. Kucharik, C., Fayram, N., and Cahill, K. 2006. A paired study of prairie carbon stocks, fluxes, and phenology: comparing the world’s oldest prairie restoration with an adjacent remnant. Global Change Biology 12:122–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leopold, A. 1988. American eye: what is an arboretum? The North American Review 273:10–13.Google Scholar
  8. Leopold, A., Callicott, J. B., and Freyfogle, E. T. 1999. Aldo Leopold: For the Health of the Land: Previously Unpublished Essays and Other Writings. Washington: Island Press Shearwater Books.Google Scholar
  9. Lym, R., and Zollinger, R. 1995. Integrated management of leafy spurge Circular W-866. Fargo: North Dakota State University Extension Service.Google Scholar
  10. Miller, B., Ceballos, G., and Reading R. 1994. The prairie dog and biotic diversity. Conservation Biology 8:677–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ojima, D. S., and Lackett, J. M. 2002. Preparing for a Changing Climate: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change – Central Great Plains. Report for the US Global Change Research Program. Fort Collins: Colorado State University.Google Scholar
  12. Olson, E. 1997. National Grasslands Management: A Primer. Natural Resources Division, Office of the General Counsel. Washington: United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  13. Popper, D., and Popper, F. 1987. The Great Plains: from dust to dust. Planning 53:12–18.Google Scholar
  14. Pyne, S. J. 1997. Fire in America: A Cultural History of Wildland and Rural Fire. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rodgers, R. 1999. Why haven’t pheasant populations in western Kansas increased with CRP? Wildlife Society Bulletin 27:654–665.Google Scholar
  16. Rodgers, R., and Hoffman, R. 2005. Prairie grouse population response to conservation reserve grasslands: an overview. In The Conservation Reserve Program–Planting for the Future: Proceedings of the National Conference, June 6–9, 2004: Fort Collins Science Center Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5145, ed. Allen, A. W., and Vandever, M. W., pp. 120–128. Fort Collins: United States Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  17. Samson, F., and Knopf, F. 1994. Prairie conservation in North America. BioScience 44:418–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Samson, F., Knopf, F., McCarthy, C., Noon, B., Ostlie, W., Rinehart, S., Larson, S., Plumb, G., Schenbeck, G., and Svingen, D. 2003. Planning for population viability on Northern Great Plains national grasslands. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31:986–999.Google Scholar
  19. Samson, F., Knopf, F., and Ostlie, W. 2004. Great Plains ecosystems: past, present, and future. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32:6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Savage, C., Williams, J. A., and Page, J. R. 2004. Prairie: A Natural History. Vancouver: Greystone Books.Google Scholar
  21. Vodehnal, W. L., and Haufler, J. B. 2007. A Grassland Conservation Plan for Prairie Grouse. Fruita: North American Grouse Partnership.Google Scholar
  22. Weaver, T., Payson, E. M., and Gustafson, D. L. 1996. Prairie ecology – the shortgrass prairie. In Prairie Conservation: Preserving North America’s Most Endangered Ecosystem, ed. Samson, F., and Knopf, F., pp. 67–75. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  23. Whidbey Camano Land Trust. 2008. Land trust begins prairie restoration in Ebey’s Reserve. Press Release, April 2008.Google Scholar
  24. Wilcox, B. A. 1984. In situ conservation of genetic resources: determinants of minimum area requirements. In National Parks, Conservation, and Development: The Role of Protected Areas in Sustaining Society. Proceedings of the World Congress on National Parks, Bali, Indonesia, October 11–22, 1982, ed. McNeely, J. A., and Miller, K., pp. 18–30. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Denison UniversityGranvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations