Quantitative Methods for the Analysis of Verbal Interactions in Psychotherapy

Chapter

Abstract

When psychotherapy is viewed as an interpersonal and interactive process, sequential methods for analyzing the intersubjective dimension of the psychotherapeutic dialogue become a strategic tool. In the first section, this chapter shows a short overview of the currently used methods in the quantitative approach to verbal interactions, and particularly those statistical tools able to handle information collected as a sequence of countable events. Then in the second section, we propose a process to move from recorded interviews to a statistically summarized result (see Fig. 10.1). The sequential steps identified in this process aim to codify the interviews, transferring them into a stream of units, classified by a nominal scale. Since every unit can be univocally assigned to a specific category, observations become countable. Despite the limitations of a nominal scale, this information may be quantitatively summarized by using appropriate statistical techniques based on frequency counts.

Keywords

Depression Psoriasis 

References

  1. Altham, P. M. (1979). Detecting relationships between categorical variables observed over time: A problem of deflating a chi-squared statistic. Applied Statistics, 28, 2115–2125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1992). SDIS: A sequential data interchange standard. Behavioral Research. Methods, Instruments and Computers, 24, 554–559.Google Scholar
  4. Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995a). Log-linear approaches to lag-sequential analysis when consecutive codes may and cannot repeat. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 2272–2284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995b). Analysing interaction. Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bockenholt, U. (1999). Analyzing multiple emotions over time by autoregressive negative multinomial regression models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 757–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiu, M. M., & Khoo, L. (2005). A new method for analyzing sequential process: Dynamic multilevel analysis. Small Group Research, 36, 600–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connor, M., Fletcher, I., & Salmon, P. (2009). The analysis of verbal interaction sequences in dyadic clinical communication: A review of methods. Patient Education and Counseling, 75, 169–177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dagne, G. A., Brown, C. H., & Howe, G. W. (2007). Hierarchical modeling of sequential behavioral data: Examining complex association patterns in mediation models. Psychological Methods, 12, 298–316.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dagne, G. A., Howe, G. W., Brown, C. H., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). Hierarchical modeling of sequential behavioral data: An empirical Bayesian approach. Psychological Methods, 7, 262–280.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dagne, G. A., & Snyder, J. (2010). Bayesian analysis of the repeated events using event-dependent frailty models: An application to behavioral observation data. Communication in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 39, 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Del Piccolo, L., Mazzi, M. A., Dunn, G., Sandri, M., & Zimmermann, C. (2007). Sequence analysis in multilevel models. A study on different sources of patient cues in medical consultations. Social Science and Medicine, 65, 2357–2370.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Doucette, A., & Wolf, A. W. (2009). Questioning the measurement precision of psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 374–389.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dumas, J. E. (1986). Controlling for autocorrelation in social interaction analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 1125–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edwards, J. A., & Lamperts, M. D. (1993). Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Eid, M., Geiser, C., & Nussbeck, F. W. (2009). Multitrait–multimethod analysis in psychotherapy research: New methodological approaches. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 390–396.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Eide, H., Quera, V., Graugaard, P., & Finset, A. (2004). Physician–patient dialogue surrounding patients' expression of concern: Applying sequence analysis to RIAS. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 145–155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Faraone, S. V., & Dorfman, D. D. (1987). Lag sequential analysis: Robust statistical methods. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 2312–2323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Finset, A. (2008). New developments in analysis of turns and sequences in clinical communication research. Patient Education and Counseling, 71, 1–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Frank, G. H., & Sweetland, A. A. (1962). Study of the process of psychotherapy: The verbal interaction. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 26, 135–138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gallop, R., & Tasca, G. A. (2009). Multilevel modelling of longitudinal data for psychotherapy researchers: II. The complexities. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 438–452.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaston, L., & Marmar, C. R. (1989). Quantitative and qualitative analyses for psychotherapy research: Integration through time-series designs. Psychotherapy, 26, 169–176.Google Scholar
  23. Goss, C., Mazzi, M. A., Del Piccolo, L., Rimondini, M., & Zimmermann, C. (2005). Information-giving sequences in general practice consultations. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 11, 339–349.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gottman, J. M., & Roy, A. K. (1990). Sequential analysis: A guide for behavioral researchers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gottschalk, L. A. (1994). The development, validation, and applications of a computerized measurement of cognitive impairment from the content analysis of verbal behaviour. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50, 349–361.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gottschalk, L. A. (2000). The application of computerized content analysis of natural language in psychotherapy research now and in future. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 54, 305–311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gottschalk, L. A., Fronczek, J., & Abel, L. (1993). Emotions, defences, coping mechanisms, and symptoms. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 10, 237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Griffin, W. A., & Gardner, W. (1989). Analysis of behavioral durations in observational studies of social interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 497–502.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hardy, G. E., Stiles, W. B., Barkham, M., & Startup, M. (1998). Therapist responsiveness to client interpersonal styles during time-limited treatments for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 304–312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89.Google Scholar
  31. Hoff, P. D. (2005). Bilinear mixed-effects models for dyadic data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 286–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Howe, G. W., Dagne, G., & Brown, C. H. (2005). Multilevel methods for modeling observed sequences of family interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 72–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  36. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Measuring the reliability of qualitative text analysis data. Quality and Quantity, 38, 787–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Langewitz, W., Nübling, M., & Weber, H. (2003). A theory-based approach to analysing conversation sequences. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 12, 103–108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lapadat, J. C., & Lindsay, A. C. (1999). Transcription in research and practice: From standardization of technique to interpretative positioning. Qualitative Inquiry, 5, 64–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leiva, F. M., Montori, F. J., & Martinez, T. L. (2006). Assessment of interjudge reliability in the open-ended questions coding process. Quality and Quantity, 40, 519–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Magnusson, M. S. (2000). Discovering hidden time patterns in behavior: T-patterns and their detection. Behavioral Research. Methods, Instruments and Computers, 32, 93–110.Google Scholar
  42. Margison, F. R., Barkham, M., Evans, C., McGrath, G., Clark, J. M., Audin, K., et al. (2000). Measurement and psychotherapy. Evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 123–130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis [28 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 1(2). Retrieved January 25, 2010 from http://qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-e/2-00inhalt-e.htm
  44. Mazzi, M., Del Piccolo, L., & Zimmermann, C. (2003). Event-based categorical sequential analyses of the medical interview. A review. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 12, 81–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Morberg Pain, C., Chadwick, P., & Abba, N. (2008). Clients' experience of case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 127–138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  47. Putnam, S. M., & Stiles, W. B. (1993). Verbal exchange in medical interviews: Implications and innovation. Social Science and Medicine, 36, 1597–1604.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Quera, V., Bakeman, R., & Gnisci, A. (2007). Observer agreement for even sequences: Methods and software for sequences alignment and reliability estimates. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 39–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Reyes, L., Aristegui, R., Krause, M., Strasser, K., Tomicic, A., Valdes, N., et al. (2008). Language and therapeutic change: A speech acts analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 355–362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in the quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sackett, G. P. (1979). The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction research. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
  52. Schilling, J. (2006). On the pragmatics of qualitative assessments. Designing the process for content analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Singer, J. B., & Willett, J. D. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Stiles, W. B., & Shapiro, D. A. (1995). Verbal exchange structure of brief psychodynamic–inter-personal and cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 15–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Tasca, G. A., & Gallop, R. (2009). Multilevel modelling of longitudinal data for psychotherapy researchers: I. The basics. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 429–437.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Tasca, G. A., & Mc Mullen, L. (1992). Interpersonal complementarity and antithesis within a stage model of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 29, 515–523.Google Scholar
  57. Tavaré, S., & Altham, P. M. (1983). Serial dependence of observations leading to contingency tables, and corrections to chi-squared statistics. Biometrika, 70, 1139–1144.Google Scholar
  58. Tschacher, W., & Ramseyer, F. (2009). Modeling psychotherapy process by time-series panel analysis (TSPA). Psychotherapy Research, 19, 469–481.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Turkington, D., & Kingdon, D. (2000). Cognitive-behavioural techniques for general psychiatrists in the management of patients with psychoses. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 101–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Van-Beek, Y., de-Roos, B., Hoeksma, J. B., & Hopkins, B. (1992). Sequential analysis of nominal data in mother–infant communication: Quantifying dominance and bidirectionality. Behaviour, 122, 306–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Viney, L. L. (1994). Sequences of emotional distress expressed by clients and acknowledged by therapists: Are they associated more with some therapists than others? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 469–481.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Wasserman, R. H., Levy, K. N., & Loken, E. (2009). Generalizability theory in psychotherapy research: The impact of multiple sources of variances on the dependability of psychotherapy process ratings. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 397–408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wiseman, H., & Rice, L. N. (1989). Sequential analyses of therapist–client interaction during change events: A task-focused approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 281–286.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Yoder, P. J., Bruce, P., & Tapp, J. (2001). Comparing sequential associations within a single dyad. Behavioral Research. Methods, Instruments and Computers, 33, 331–338.Google Scholar
  65. Zimmermann, C., Del Piccolo, L., & Mazzi, M. A. (2003). Patient cues and medical interviewing in general practice. Examples of the application of sequential analysis. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 12, 115–123.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Health and Community MedicineUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations