Abstract
In this chapter, we discuss some approaches to the problem of protein structure prediction by addressing “simpler” sub-problems. The rationale behind this strategy is to develop methods for predicting some interesting structural characteristics of the protein, which can be useful per se and, at the same time, can be of help in solving the main problem. In particular, we discuss the problem of predicting the protein secondary structure, which is at the moment one of the most successful sub-problems addressed in computational biology. Available secondary structure predictors are very reliable and can be routinely used for annotating new genomes or as input for other more complex prediction tasks, such as remote homology detection and functional assignments. As a second example, we also discuss the problem of predicting residue–residue contacts in proteins. In this case, the task is much more complex than secondary structure prediction, and no satisfactory results have been achieved so far. Differently from the secondary structure sub-problem, the residue–residue contact sub-problem is not intrinsically simpler than the prediction of the protein structure, since a roughly correctly predicted set of residue–residue contacts would directly lead to prediction of a protein backbone very close to the real structure. These two protein structure sub-problems are discussed in the light of the current evaluation of the performance that are based on periodical blind-checks (CASP meetings) and permanent evaluation (EVA servers).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
BAliBASE3 database: http://www-bio3d-igbmc.u-strasbg.fr/balibase/
- 4.
Jalview software: http://www.jalview.org/
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
References
Aloy, P., Stark, A., Hadley, C., Russell, R.B.: Predictions without templates: new folds, secondary structure, and contacts in CASP5. Proteins 53, 436–456 (2003)
Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., Lipman, D.J.: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402 (1997)
Bartoli, L., Capriotti, E., Fariselli, P., Martelli, P.L., Casadio, R.: The pros and cons of predicting protein contact maps. Methods Mol Biol. 413, 199–217 (2008)
Benner, S.A., Gerloff, D.: Patterns of divergence in homologous proteins as indicators of secondary and tertiary structure: a prediction of the structure of the catalytic domain of protein kinases. Adv. Enzyme Regul. 31, 121–181 (1991)
Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Chou, P.Y., Fasman, G.D.: Conformational parameters for amino acids in helical, beta-sheet, and random coil regions calculated from proteins. Biochemistry 13, 211–222 (1974)
Cozzetto, D., Tramontano, A.: Advances and pitfalls in protein structure prediction. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 9, 567–577 (2008)
Dayhoff, M.O.: Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington DC (1978)
Di Lena, P., Fariselli, P., Margara, L., Vassura, M., Casadio, R.: On the Upper Bound of the Prediction Accuracy of Residue Contacts in Proteins with Correlated Mutations: The Case Study of the Similarity Matrices. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5488, 210–221 (2009)
Edgar, R.C.: MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004)
Ezkurdia, I., Graña, O., Izarzugaza, J.M., Tress, M.L.: Assessment of domain boundary predictions and the prediction of intramolecular contacts in CASP8. Proteins 77, 196–209 (2009)
Fariselli, P., Olmea, O., Valencia, A., Casadio, R.: Prediction of contact maps with neural networks and correlated mutations. Protein Eng. 14, 835–843 (2001)
Fariselli, P., Olmea, O., Valencia, A., Casadio, R.: Progress in predicting inter-residue contacts of proteins with neural networks and correlated mutations. Proteins 5, 157–162 (2001)
Fodor, A.A., Aldrich, R.W.: Influence of conservation on calculations of amino acid covariance in multiple sequence alignments. Proteins 56, 211–221 (2004)
Garcia-Boronat, M., Diez-Rivero, C.M., Reinherz, E.L., Reche, P.A.: PVS: a web server for protein sequence variability analysis tuned to facilitate conserved epitope discovery. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 35–41 (2008)
Garnier, J., Osguthorpe, D.J., Robson, B.: Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 120, 97–120 (1978)
Göbel, U., Sander, C., Schneider, R., Valencia, A.: Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins 18, 309–317 (1994)
Graña, O., Baker, D., MacCallum, R.M., Meiler, J., Punta, M., Rost, B., Tress, M.L., Valencia, A.: CASP6 assessment of contact prediction. Proteins 61, 214–224 (2005)
Horner, D.S., Pirovano, W., Pesole, G.: Correlated substitution analysis and the prediction of amino acid structural contacts. Brief. Bioinform. 9, 46–56 (2008)
Izarzugaza, J.M., Graña, O., Tress, M.L., Valencia, A., Clarke, N.D.: Assessment of intramolecular contact predictions for CASP7. Proteins 69, 152–158 (2007)
Jones, D.T.: Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 292, 195–202 (1999)
Jones, D.T., Taylor, W.R., Thornton, J.M.: A model recognition approach to the pre-diction of all-helical membrane protein structure and topology. Biochemistry 33, 3038–3049 (1994)
Kabsch, W., Sander, C.: Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22, 2577–2637 (1983)
Karplus, K., Barrett, C., Hughey, R.: Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 14, 846–856 (1998)
Karplus, K., Katzman, S., Shackleford, G., Koeva, M., Draper, J., Barnes, B., Soriano, M., Hughey, R.: SAM-T04: what is new in protein-structure prediction for CASP6. Proteins 61, 135–142 (2005)
Lesk, A.: Introduction to Bioinformatics. Oxford University Press, London (2006)
Lin, K., Simossis, V.A., Taylor, W.R., Heringa, J.: A simple and fast secondary structure prediction method using hidden neural networks. Bioinformatics 21, 152–159 (2005)
McLachlan, A.D.: Tests for comparing related amino-acid sequences. Cytochrome c and cytochrome c 551. J. Mol. Biol. 61, 409–424 (1971)
Notredame, C., Higgins, D.G., Heringa, J.: T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol. 302, 205–217 (2000)
Ouali, M., King, R.D.: Cascaded multiple classifiers for secondary structure pre-diction. Protein Sci. 9, 1162–1176 (2000)
Pauling, L., Corey, R.B.: Configurations of polypeptide chains with favored orientations around single bonds: two new pleated sheets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 37, 729–740 (1951)
Pauling, L., Corey, R.B., Branson, H.R.: The structure of proteins: two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 37, 205–211 (1951)
Pollastri, G., McLysaght, A.: Porter: a new, accurate server for protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics 21, 1719–1720 (2005)
Pollastri, G., Przybylski. D., Rost, B., Baldi, P.: Improving the prediction of protein secondary structure in three and eight classes using recurrent neural networks and profiles. Proteins 47, 228–235 (2002)
Pollock, D.D., Taylor, W.R.: Effectiveness of correlation analysis in identifying protein residues undergoing correlated evolution. Protein 10, 647–657 (1997)
Porollo, A., Adamczak, R., Wagner, M., Meller, J.: Maximum Feasibility Approach for Consensus Classifiers: Applications to Protein Structure Prediction. In proceedings of CIRAS 2003
Przybylski, D., Rost, B.: Alignments grow, secondary structure prediction improves. Proteins 46, 197–205 (2002)
Punta, M., Rost, B.: PROFcon: novel prediction of long-range contacts. Bioinformatics 21, 2960–2968 (2005)
Raghava, G.P.S.: APSSP2: A combination method for protein secondary structure prediction based on neural network and example based learning. CASP5 A-132 (2002)
Rost, B.: Rising accuracy of protein secondary structure prediction. In: Chasman D (ed.) Protein structure determination, analysis, and modeling for drug discovery, pp. 207–249. Dekker, New York (2003)
Rost, B., Sander, C.: Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J. Mol. Biol. 232, 584–599 (1993)
Rost, B., Sander, C.: Third generation prediction of secondary structures. Methods Mol. Biol. 143, 71–95 (2000)
Sander, C., Schneider, R.: Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins 9, 56–68 (1991)
Shackelford, G., Karplus, K.: Contact prediction using mutual information and neural nets. Proteins 69,159–164 (2007)
Sjölander, K., Karplus, K., Brown, M., Hughey, R., Krogh, A., Mian, I.S., Haussler, D.: Dirichlet mixtures: a method for improved detection of weak but significant protein sequence homology. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12, 327–345 (1996)
Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., Gibson, T.J.: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673–4680 (1994)
Ward, J.J., McGuffin, L.J., Buxton, B.F., Jones, D.T.: Secondary structure prediction with support vector machines. Bioinformatics 19, 1650–1655 (2003)
Wootton, J.C., Federhen, S.: Statistics of local complexity in amino acid sequences and sequence databases. Comput. Chem. 17,149–163 (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Di Lena, P., Fariselli, P., Margara, L., Vassura, M., Casadio, R. (2011). Divide and Conquer Strategies for Protein Structure Prediction. In: Bruni, R. (eds) Mathematical Approaches to Polymer Sequence Analysis and Related Problems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6800-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6800-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-6799-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-6800-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)