Advertisement

Roles for Sphingolipids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  • Robert C. Dickson
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 688)

Abstract

Studies using Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the common baker’s or brewer’s yeast, have progressed over the past twenty years from knowing which sphingolipids are present in cells and a basic outline of how they are made to a complete or nearly complete directory of the genes that catalyze their anabolism and catabolism. In addition, cellular processes that depend upon sphingolipids have been identified including protein trafficking/exocytosis, endocytosis and actin cytoskeleton dynamics, membrane microdomains, calcium signaling, regulation of transcription and translation, cell cycle control, stress resistance, nutrient uptake and aging. These will be summarized here along with new data not previously reviewed. Advances in our knowledge of sphingolipids and their roles in yeast are impressive but molecular mechanisms remain elusive and are a primary challenge for further progress in understanding the specific functions of sphingolipids.

Keywords

Heat Stress Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Sphingolipid Synthesis Chronological Lifespan Complex Sphingolipids 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Carter HE, Hendrickson HS. Biochemistry of the sphingolipids. XV. Structure of phytosphingosine and dehydrophytospingosine. Biochemistry 1963; 2:389–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dickson RC, Lester RL. Metabolism and selected functions of sphingolipids in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1999; 1438(3):305–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dickson RC, Lester RL. Yeast sphingolipids. Biochim Biophys Acta 1999; 1426(2):347–357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dickson RC, Lester RL. Sphingolipid functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002; 1583(1):13–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sims KJ, Spassieva SD, Voit EO et al. Yeast sphingolipid metabolism: clues and connections. Biochem Cell Biol 2004; 82(1):45–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dickson RC. Thematic review series: sphingolipids. New insights into sphingolipid metabolism and function in budding yeast. J Lipid Res 2008; 49(5):909–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patton JL, Lester RL. The phosphoinositol sphingolipids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are highly localized in the plasma membrane. J Bacteriol 1991; 173(10):3101–3108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Funato K, Vallee B, Riezman H. Biosynthesis and trafficking of sphingolipids in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemistry 2002; 41(51):15105–15114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dickson RC, Sumanasekera C, Lester RL. Functions and metabolism of sphingolipids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Prog Lipid Res 2006; 45(6):447–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cowart LA, Obeid LM. Yeast sphingolipids: recent developments in understanding biosynthesis, regulation and function. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007; 1771(3):421–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Funato K, Riezman H. Vesicular and nonvesicular transport of ceramide from ER to the Golgi apparatus in yeast. J Cell Biol 2001; 155(6):949–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Natter K, Leitner P, Faschinger A et al. The spatial organization of lipid synthesis in the yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae derived from large scale green fluorescent protein tagging and high resolution microscopy. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005; 4(5):662–672.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hechtberger P, Daum G. Intracellular transport of inositol-containing sphingolipids in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 1995; 367(2):201–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Futerman AH, Riezman H. The ins and outs of sphingolipid synthesis. Trends Cell Biol 2005; 15(6):312–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hechtberger P, Zinser E, Saf R et al. Characterization, quantification and subcellular localization of inositol-containing sphingolipids of the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur J Biochem 1994; 225(2):641–649.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schneiter R, Brugger B, Sandhoff R et al. Electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) analysis of the lipid molecular species composition of yeast subcellular membranes reveals acyl chain-based sorting/remodeling of distinct molecular species en route to the plasma membrane. J Cell Biol 1999; 146(4):741–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kitagaki H, Cowart LA, Matmati N et al. Isc1 regulates sphingolipid metabolism in yeast mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007; 1768(11):2849–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith SW, Lester RL. Inositol phosphorylceramide, a novel substance and a chief member of a major group of yeast sphingolipids containing single inositol phosphate. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1974; 249:3395–3405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oh CS, Toke DA, Mandala S et al. ELO2 and ELO3, homologues of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ELO1 gene, function in fatty acid elongation and are required for sphingolipid formation. J Biol Chem 1997; 272(28):17376–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kohlwein SD, Eder S, Oh CS et al. Tsc13p is required for fatty acid elongation and localizes to a novel structure at the nuclear-vacuolar interface in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21(1):109–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rossler H, Rieck C, Delong T et al. Functional differentiation and selective inactivation of multiple Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes involved in very-long-chain fatty acid synthesis. Mol Genet Genomics 2003; 269(2):290–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Denic V, Weissman JS. A molecular caliper mechanism for determining very long-chain fatty acid length. Cell 2007; 130(4):663–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schneiter R, Hitomi M, Ivessa AS et al. A yeast acetyl coenzyme a carboxylase mutant links very-long-chain fatty acid synthesis to the structure and function of the nuclear membrane-pore complex. Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16(12):7161–7172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cerantola V, Vionnet C, Aebischer OF et al. Yeast sphingolipids do not need to contain very long chain fatty acids. Biochem J 2007; 401(1):205–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lynch V, Dunn T. An introduction to plant sphingolipids and a review of recent advances in understanding their metabolism and function. New Phytologist 2004; 16(3):677–702.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Markham JE, Li J, Cahoon EB et al. Separation and identification of major plant sphingolipid classes from leaves. J Biol Chem 2006; 281(32):22684–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Replansky T, Koufopanou V, Greig D et al. Saccharomyces sensu stricto as a model system for evolution and ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 2008; 23(9):494–501.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Raas-Rothschild A, Pankova-Kholmyansky I, Kacher Y et al. Glycosphingolipidoses: beyond the enzymatic defect. Glycoconj J 2004; 21(6):295–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Welsch CA, Roth LW, Goetschy JF et al. Genetic, biochemical and transcriptional responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the novel immunomodulator FTY720 largely mimic those of the natural sphingolipid phytosphingosine. J Biol Chem 2004; 279(35):36720–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sawai H, Okamoto Y, Luberto C et al. Identification of ISC1 (YER019w) as inositol phosphosphingolipid phospholipase C in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2000; 275(50):39793–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wells GB, Dickson RC, Lester RL. Isolation and composition of inositolphosphorylceramide-type sphingolipids of hyphal forms of Candida albicans. Journal of Bacteriology 1996; 178(21):6223–6226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vaena de Avalos S, Su X, Zhang M et al. The phosphatidylglycerol/cardiolipin biosynthetic pathway is required for the activation of inositol phosphosphingolipid phospholipase C, Isc1p, during growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2005; 280(8):7170–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhao C, Beeler T, Dunn T. Suppressors of the Ca(2+)-sensitive yeast mutant (csg2) identify genes involved in sphingolipid biosynthesis. Cloning and characterization of SCS1, a gene required for serine palmitoyltransferase activity. J Biol Chem 1994; 269(34):21480–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Beeler T, Bacikova D, Gable K et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae TSC10/YBR265w gene encoding 3-ketosphinganine reductase is identified in a screen for temperature-sensitive suppressors of the Ca2+-sensitive csg2 Delta mutant. J Biol Chem 1998; 273(46):30688–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mao C, Xu R, Bielawska A et al. Cloning of an alkaline ceramidase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. An enzyme with reverse (CoA-independent) ceramide synthase activity. J Biol Chem 2000; 275(10):6876–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mao C, Xu R, Bielawska A et al. Cloning and characterization of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae alkaline ceramidase with specificity for dihydroceramide. J Biol Chem 2000; 275(40):31369–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pruett ST, Bushnev A, Hagedorn K et al. Biodiversity of sphingoid bases (“sphingosines”) and related amino alcohols. J Lipid Res 2008; 49(8):1621–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Munn AL, Riezman H. Endocytosis is required for the growth of vacuolar H(+)-ATPase-defective yeast: identification of six new END genes. J Cell Biol 1994; 127(2):373–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sutterlin C, Doering TL, Schimmoller F et al. Specific requirements for the ER to Golgi transport of GPI-anchored proteins in yeast. Journal of Cell Science 1997; 110(Pt 21):2703–2714.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chung N, Jenkins G, Hannun YA et al. Sphingolipids signal heat stress-induced ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. J Biol Chem 2000; 275(23):17229–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zanolari B, Friant S, Funato K et al. Sphingoid base synthesis requirement for endocytosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 2000; 19(12):2824–2833.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hearn JD, Lester RL, Dickson RC. The uracil transporter Fur4p associates with lipid rafts. J Biol Chem 2003; 278(6):3679–3686.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Grote E, Vlacich G, Pypaert M et al. A snc1 endocytosis mutant: phenotypic analysis and suppression by overproduction of dihydrosphingosine phosphate lyase. Mol Biol Cell 2000; 11(12):4051–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bultynck G, Heath VL, Majeed AP et al. Slm1 and slm2 are novel substrates of the calcineurin phosphatase required for heat stress-induced endocytosis of the yeast uracil permease. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26(12):4729–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bagnat M, Simons K. Lipid rafts in protein sorting and cell polarity in budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biol Chem 2002; 383(10):1475–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Simons K, Vaz WL. Model systems, lipid rafts and cell membranes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2004; 33:269–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lisman Q, Pomorski T, Vogelzangs C et al. Protein sorting in the late Golgi of Saccharomyces cerevisiae does not require mannosylated sphingolipids. J Biol Chem 2004; 279(2):1020–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Proszynski TJ, Klemm RW, Gravert M et al. A genome-wide visual screen reveals a role for sphingolipids and ergosterol in cell surface delivery in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102(50):17981–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bagnat M, Keranen S, Shevchenko A et al. Lipid rafts function in biosynthetic delivery of proteins to the cell surface in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97(7):3254–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wang Q, Chang A. Sphingoid base synthesis is required for oligomerization and cell surface stability of the yeast plasma membrane ATPase, Pma1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99(20):12853–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lee MC, Hamamoto S, Schekman R. Ceramide biosynthesis is required for the formation of the oligomeric H+-ATPase Pma1p in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 2002; 277(25):22395–401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Eisenkolb M, Zenzmaier C, Leitner E et al. A specific structural requirement for ergosterol in long-chain fatty acid synthesis mutants important for maintaining raft domains in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2002; 13(12):4414–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gaigg B, Timischl B, Corbino L et al. Synthesis of sphingolipids with very long chain fatty acids but not ergosterol is required for routing of newly synthesized plasma membrane ATPase to the cell surface of yeast. J Biol Chem 2005; 280(23):22515–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Toulmay A, Schneiter R. Lipid-dependent surface transport of the proton pumping ATPase: a model to study plasma membrane biogenesis in yeast. Biochimie 2007; 89(2):249–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bagnat M, Simons K. Cell surface polarization during yeast mating. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99(22):14183–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Dupre S, Haguenauer-Tsapis R. Raft partitioning of the yeast uracil permease during trafficking along the endocytic pathway. Traffic 2003; 4(2):83–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Opekarova M, Malinska K, Novakova L et al. Differential effect of phosphatidylethanolamine depletion on raft proteins: further evidence for diversity of rafts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 2005; 1711(1):87–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lauwers E, Grossmann G, Andre B. Evidence for coupled biogenesis of yeast Gap1 permease and sphingolipids: essential role in transport activity and normal control by ubiquitination. Mol Biol Cell 2007; 18(8):3068–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gaigg B, Toulmay A, Schneiter R. Very long-chain fatty acid-containing lipids rather than sphingolipids per se are required for raft association and stable surface transport of newly synthesized plasma membrane ATPase in yeast. J Biol Chem 2006; 281(45):34135–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Olivera A, Zhang H, Carlson RO et al. Stereospecificity of sphingosine-induced intracellular calcium mobilization and cellular proliferation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1994; 269(27):17924–17930.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Birchwood CJ, Saba JD, Dickson RC et al. Calcium influx and signaling in yeast stimulated by intracellular sphingosine 1-phosphate accumulation. J Biol Chem 2001; 276(15):11712–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Beeler T, Gable K, Zhao C et al. A novel protein, CSG2p, is required for Ca2+ regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 1994; 269(10):7279–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Lisman Q, Urli-Stam D, Holthuis JC. HOR7, a multicopy suppressor of the Ca2+-induced growth defect in sphingolipid mannosyltransferase-deficient yeast. J Biol Chem 2004; 279(35):36390–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Skrzypek MS, Nagiec MM, Lester RL et al. Inhibition of amino acid transport by sphingoid long chain bases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 1998; 273(5):2829–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Chung N, Mao C, Heitman J et al. Phytosphingosine as a specific inhibitor of growth and nutrient import in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2001; 276(38):35614–35621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Friant S, Meier KD, Riezman H. Increased ubiquitin-dependent degradation can replace the essential requirement for heat shock protein induction. EMBO J 2003; 22(15):3783–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Gelperin D, Horton L, DeChant A et al. Loss of ypk1 function causes rapamycin sensitivity, inhibition of translation initiation and synthetic lethality in 14-3-3-deficient yeast. Genetics 2002; 161(4):1453–1464.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kraakman L, Lemaire K, Ma P et al. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae G-protein coupled receptor, Gpr1, is specifically required for glucose activation of the cAMP pathway during the transition to growth on glucose. Mol Microbiol 1999; 32(5):1002–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Roosen J, Engelen K, Marchal K et al. PKA and Sch9 control a molecular switch important for the proper adaptation to nutrient availability. Molecular Microbiology 2005; 55(3):862–880.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Valachovic M, Wilcox LI, Sturley SL et al. A mutation in sphingolipid synthesis suppresses defects in yeast ergosterol metabolism. Lipids 2004; 39(8):747–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Valachovic M, Bareither BM, Shah Alam Bhuiyan M et al. Cumulative mutations affecting sterol biosynthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae result in synthetic lethality that is suppressed by alterations in sphingolipid profiles. Genetics 2006; 173(4):1893–908.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Swain E, Baudry K, Stukey J et al. Sterol-dependent regulation of sphingolipid metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2002; 277(29):26177–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Kihara A, Igarashi Y. Cross talk between sphingolipids and glycerophospholipids in the establishment of plasma membrane asymmetry. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15(11):4949–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Thevissen K, Francois IE, Takemoto JY et al. DmAMP1, an antifungal plant defensin from dahlia (Dahlia merckii), interacts with sphingolipids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2003; 226(1):169–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Thevissen K, Cammue BP, Lemaire K et al. A gene encoding a sphingolipid biosynthesis enzyme determines the sensitivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an antifungal plant defensin from dahlia (Dahlia merckii). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97(17):9531–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Stock SD, Hama H, Radding JA et al. Syringomycin E inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: requirement for biosynthesis of sphingolipids with very-long-chain fatty acids and mannose-and phosphoinositol-containing head groups. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 44(5):1174–1180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Hama H, Youngb DA, Raddingb JA et al. Requirement of sphingolipid alpha-hydroxylation for fungicidal action of syringomycin E. FEBS Lett 2000; 478(1–2):26–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Grilley MM, Stock SD, Dickson RC et al. Syringomycin action gene SYR2 is essential for sphingolipid 4-hydroxylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 1998; 273(18):11062–11068.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Bosson R, Conzelmann A. Multiple functions of inositolphosphorylceramides in the formation and intracellular transport of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins in yeast. Biochem Soc Symp 2007(74):199–209.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Horvath A, Sutterlin C, Manning-Krieg U et al. Ceramide synthesis enhances transport of GPI-anchored proteins to the Golgi apparatus in yeast. Embo J 1994; 13(16):3687–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Skrzypek M, Lester RL, Dickson RC. Suppressor gene analysis reveals an essential role for sphingolipids in transport of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 1997; 179(5):1513–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Daquinag A, Fadri M, Jung SY et al. The yeast PH domain proteins Slm1 and Slm2 are targets of sphingolipid signaling during the response to heat stress. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27(2):633–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Chung JH, Lester RL, Dickson RC. Sphingolipid requirement for generation of a functional v1 component of the vacuolar ATPase. J Biol Chem 2003; 278(31):28872–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Carpinteiro A, Dumitru C, Schenck M et al. Ceramide-induced cell death in malignant cells. Cancer Lett 2008; 264(1):1–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Hanun YA, Obeid LM. Principles of bioactive lipid signalling: lessons from sphingolipids. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008; 9(2):139–50.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Hait NC, Oskeritzian CA, Paugh SW et al. Sphingosine kinases, sphingosine 1-phosphate, apoptosis and diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006; 1758(12):2016–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Dickson RC, Nagiec EE, Skrzypek M et al. Sphingolipids are potential heat stress signals in Saccharomyces. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1997; 272:30196–30200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Jenkins GM, Richards A, Wahl T et al. Involvement of yeast sphingolipids in the heat stress response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 1997; 272(51):32566–32572.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Sun Y, Taniguchi R, Tanoue D et al. Sli2 (Ypk1), a homologue of mammalian protein kinase SGK, is a downstream kinase in the sphingolipid-mediated signaling pathway of yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20(12):4411–4419.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Schmelzle T, Helliwell SB, Hall MN. Yeast protein kinases and the RHO1 exchange factor TUS1 are novel components of the cell integrity pathway in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22(5):1329–1339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Roelants FM, Torrance PD, Bezman N et al. Pkh1 and Pkh2 differentially phosphorylate and activate Ypk1 and Ykr2 and define protein kinase modules required for maintenance of cell wall integrity. Mol Biol Cell 2002; 13(9):3005–3028.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    deHart AK, Schnell JD, Allen DA et al. The conserved Pkh-Ypk kinase cascade is required for endocytosis in yeast. J Cell Biol 2002; 156(2):241–248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Casamayor A, Torrance PD, Kobayashi T et al. Functional counterparts of mammalian protein kinases PDK1 and SGK in budding yeast. Current Biology 1999; 9(4):186–197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Urban J, Soulard A, Huber A et al. Sch9 is a major target of TORC1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell 2007; 26(5):663–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Zhang X, Lester RL, Dickson RC. Pil1p and Lsp1p negatively regulate the 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-like kinase Pkh1p and downstream signaling pathways Pkc1p and Ypk1p. J Biol Chem 2004; 279(21):22030–22038.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Hillenmeyer ME, Fung E, Wildenhain J et al. The chemical genomic portrait of yeast: uncovering a phenotype for all genes. Science 2008; 320(5874):362–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Liu K, Zhang X, Lester RL et al. The sphingoid long chain base phytosphingosine activates AGC-type protein kinases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae including Ypk1, Ypk2 and Sch9. J Biol Chem 2005; 280(24):22679–22987.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Walther TC, Aguilar PS, Frohlich F et al. Pkh-kinases control eisosome assembly and organization. Embo J 2007; 26(24):4946–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Walther TC, Brickner JH, Aguilar PS et al. Eisosomes mark static sites of endocytosis. Nature 2006; 439(7079):998–1003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Luo G, Gruhler A, Liu Y et al. The sphingolipid long-chain base-Pkh1/2-Ypk1/2 signaling pathway regulates eisosome assembly and turnover. J Biol Chem 2008; 283(16):10433–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Kobayashi T, Takematsu H, Yamaji T et al. Disturbance of sphingolipid biosynthesis abrogates the signaling of Mss4, phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase, in yeast. J Biol Chem 2005; 280(18):18087–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Tabuchi M, Audhya A, Parsons AB et al. The phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate and TORC2 binding proteins Slm1 and Slm2 function in sphingolipid regulation. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26(15):5861–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Audhya A, Loewith R, Parsons AB et al. Genome-wide lethality screen identifies new PI4,5P2 effectors that regulate the actin cytoskeleton. Embo J 2004; 23(19):3747–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Yu JW, Mendrola JM, Audhya A et al. Genome-wide analysis of membrane targeting by S. cerevisiae pleckstrin homology domains. Mol Cell 2004; 13(5):677–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Fadri M, Daquinag A, Wang S et al. The pleckstrin homology domain proteins Slm1 and Slm2 are required for actin cytoskeleton organization in yeast and bind phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate and TORC2. Mol Biol Cell 2005; 16(4):1883–900.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Sturgill TW, Cohen A, Diefenbacher M et al. TOR1 and TOR2 have distinct locations in live cells. Eukaryot Cell 2008; 7(10):1819–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Dunn TM, Haak D, Monaghan E et al. Synthesis of monohydroxylated inositolphosphorylceramide (IPC-C) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires Scs7p, a protein with both a cytochrome b5-like domain and a hydroxylase/desaturase domain. Yeast 1998; 14(4):311–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Brace JL, Lester RL, Dickson RC et al. SVF1 regulates cell survival by affecting sphingolipid metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2007; 175(1):65–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    D’Mello NP, Childress AM, Franklin DS et al. Cloning and characterization of LAG1, a longevity-assurance gene in yeast. J Biol Chem 1994; 269(22):15451–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Guillas I, Kirchman PA, Chuard R et al. C26-CoA-dependent ceramide synthesis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is operated by Lag1p and Lac1p. Embo J 2001; 20(11):2655–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Schorling S, Vallee B, Barz WP et al. Lag1p and Lac1p are essential for the Acyl-CoA-dependent Ceramide synthase reaction in saccharomyces cerevisae. Mol Biol Cell 2001; 12(11):3417–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Fabrizio P, Pozza F, Pletcher SD et al. Regulation of longevity and stress resistance by Sch9 in yeast. Science 2001; 292(5515):288–290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Kaeberlein M, Powers RW 3rd, Steffen KK et al. Regulation of yeast replicative life span by TOR and Sch9 in response to nutrients. Science 2005; 310(5751):1193–1196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Almeida T, Marques M, Mojzita D et al. Isc1p plays a key role in hydrogen peroxide resistance and chronological lifespan through modulation of iron levels and apoptosis. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19(3):865–876.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Madeo F, Frohlich E, Ligr M et al. Oxygen stress: a regulator of apoptosis in yeast. J Cell Biol 1999; 145(4):757–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Madeo F, Herker E, Maldener C et al. A caspase-related protease regulates apoptosis in yeast. Mol Cell 2002; 9(4):911–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Fabrizio P, Battistella L, Vardavas R et al. Superoxide is a mediator of an altruistic aging program in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 2004; 166(7):1055–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Herker E, Jungwirth H, Lehmann KA et al. Chronological aging leads to apoptosis in yeast. J Cell Biol 2004; 164(4):501–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Ogretmen B, Hannun YA. Biologically active sphingolipids in cancer pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Cancer 2004; 4(8):604–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Taha TA, Mullen TD, Obeid LM. A house divided: ceramide, sphingosine and sphingosine-1-phosphate in programmed cell death. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006; 1758(12):2027–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Aerts AM, Zabrocki P, Francois IE et al. Ydc1p ceramidase triggers organelle fragmentation, apoptosis and accelerated ageing in yeast. Cell Mol Life Sci 2008; 65(12):1933–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Aronova S, Wedaman K, Aronov PA et al. Regulation of ceramide biosynthesis by TOR complex 2. Cell Metab 2008; 7(2):148–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Wullschleger S, Loewith R, Hall MN. TOR signaling in growth and metabolism. Cell 2006; 124(3):471–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Kamada Y, Fujioka Y, Suzuki NN et al. Tor2 directly phosphorylates the AGC kinase Ypk2 to regulate actin polarization. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25(16):7239–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Dickson RC. More chores for TOR: de novo ceramide synthesis. Cell Metab 2008; 7(2):99–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Bammert GF, Fostel JM. Genome-wide expression patterns in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Comparison of drug treatments and genetic alterations affecting biosynthesis of ergosterol. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 44(5):1255–1265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Kwast KE, Lai LC, Menda N et al. Genomic analyses of anaerobically induced genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: functional roles of Rox1 and other factors in mediating the anoxic response. J Bacteriol 2002; 184(1):250–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Cowart LA, Okamoto Y, Pinto FR et al. Roles for sphingolipid biosynthesis in mediation of specific programs of the heat stress response determined through gene expression profiling. J Biol Chem 2003; 278(32):30328–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Baetz K, McHardy L, Gable K et al. Yeast genome-wide drug-induced haploinsufficiency screen to determine drug mode of action. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101(13):4525–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Laun P, Ramachandran L, Jarolim S et al. A comparison of the aging and apoptotic transcriptome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2005; 5(12):1261–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Bielawski J, Szulc ZM, Hannun YA et al. Simultaneous quantitative analysis of bioactive sphingolipids by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Methods 2006; 39(2):82–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Guan XL, Wenk MR. Mass spectrometry-based profiling of phospholipids and sphingolipids in extracts from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2006; 23(6):465–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Sullards MC, Allegood JC, Kelly S et al. Structure-specific, quantitative methods for analysis of sphingolipids by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: “inside-out” sphingolipidomics. Methods Enzymol 2007; 432:83–115.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert C. Dickson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry and the Lucille P. Markey Cancer CenterUniversity of Kentucky College of MedicineLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations