The Effects of English Proficiency Among Childhood Immigrants: Are Hispanics Different?

  • Mevlude Akbulut-Yuksel
  • Hoyt Bleakley
  • Aimee Chin
Part of the Immigrants and Minorities, Politics and Policy book series (IMPP)


We test whether the effect of English proficiency differs between Hispanic and non-Hispanic immigrants. Using 2000 US Census microdata on immigrants who arrived before age 15, we relate labor market, education, marriage, fertility, and location of residence variables to their age at arrival in the US, and in particular whether that age fell within the “critical period” of language acquisition. We interpret the observed difference in outcomes between childhood immigrants who arrive during the critical period and those who arrive later (adjusted for non-language-related age-at-arrival effects using childhood immigrants from English-speaking countries) as an effect of English-language skills and construct an instrumental variable for English-language skills. We find that both Hispanics and non-Hispanics exhibit lower English proficiency if they arrive after the critical period, but this drop in English proficiency is larger for Hispanics. The effect of English proficiency on earnings and education is nevertheless quite similar across groups, while some differences are seen for marriage, fertility, and location of residence outcomes. In particular, although higher English proficiency reduces (for both groups) the number of children and the propensity to be married, marry someone with the same birthplace or origin, and live in an “ethnic enclave,” these effects are smaller for Hispanics.


Language Acquisition English Proficiency Official Language Ethnic Community Childhood Immigrant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We thank Chinhui Juhn, Stephen Trejo, and participants in the IUPLR Conference in April 2007 for helpful comments and discussion. Financial support from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R03HD051562) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors bear sole responsibility for the content of this chapter.


  1. 1.
    Chiswick, Barry. 1991. “Speaking, Reading and Earnings among Low-Skilled Immigrants.” Journal of Labor Economics, 9(2): 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kossoudji, Sherrie. 1988. “English Language Ability and the Labor Market Opportunities of Hispanic and East Asian Immigrant Men.” Journal of Labor Economics, 6(2): 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McManus, Walter, William Gould, and Finis Welch. 1983. “Earnings of Hispanic Men: The Role of English Language Proficiency.” Journal of Labor Economics, 1(2): 101–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tanier, Evelina. 1988. “English Language Proficiency and Earnings among Foreign-born Men.” Journal of Human Resources, 23(1): 108–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glick, Jennifer, and Michael White. 2003. “The Academic Trajectories of Immigrant Youths: Analysis Within and Across Cohorts.” Demography, 40(4): 759–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Portes, Alejandro, and Dag MacLeod. 1999. “Educating the Second Generation: Determinants of Academic Achievement among Children of Immigrants in the United States.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 25(3): 373–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davila, Alberto, and Marie Mora. 2001. “The Marital Status of Recent Immigrants in the United States in 1980 and 1990.” International Migration Review, 35(2): 506–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meng, Xin, and Robert Gregory. 2005. “Intermarriage and the Economic Assimilation of Immigrants.” Journal of Labor Economics, 23(1): 135–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stevens, Gillian, and Gray Swicegood. 1987. “The Linguistic Context of Ethnic Endogamy.” American Sociological Review, 52(1): 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sorenson, Ann Marie. 1988. “The Fertility and Language Characteristics of Mexican-American and Non-Hispanic Husbands and Wives.” Sociological Quarterly, 29(1): 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Swicegood, Gray, Frank Bean, Elizabeth Stephen, and Wolfgang Opitz. 1988. “Language Usage and Fertility in the Mexican-Origin Population of the United States.” Demography, 25(1): 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Angrist, Joshua, and Victor Lavy. 1997. “The Effect of a Change in Language of Instruction on the Returns to Schooling in Morocco.” Journal of Labor Economics, 15(1): S48–S76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chiswick, Barry, and Paul W. Miller. 1995. “The Endogeneity between Language and Earnings: International Analyses.” Journal of Labor Economics, 13(2): 246–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dustmann, Christian, and Arthur van Soest. 2002. “Language and the Earnings of Immigrants.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 55(3): 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bleakley, Hoyt, and Aimee Chin. 2004. “Language Skills and Earnings: Evidence from Childhood Immigrants.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2): 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bleakley, Hoyt, and Aimee Chin. 2010. “Age at Arrival, English Proficiency, and Social Assimilation among U.S. Immigrants.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(1): 165–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bleakley, Hoyt, and Aimee Chin. 2008. “What Holds Back the Second Generation? The Intergenerational Transmission of Language Human Capital among Immigrants.” Journal of Human Resources, 43(2): 267–298.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kominski, Robert. 1989. “How Good Is ‘How Well’? An Examination of the Census English-Speaking Ability Question.” Paper presented at the 1989 Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lenneberg, Eric. 1967. Biological Foundation of Language. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fry, Richard, and Shirin Hakimzadeh. 2006a. A Statistical Portrait of the Foreign-born Population at Mid-Decade.” Pew Hispanic Center Report, Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ruggles, Steven, Matthew Sobek, Trent Alexander, Catherine Fitch, Ronald Goeken, Patricia Hall, Miriam King, and Chad Ronnander. 2004. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 3.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Population Center.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    World Almanac, and Robert Famighetti. 1999. World Almanac and Book of Facts, 1999, New York: World Almanac Books.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Duncan, Brian, and Stephen Trejo. 2007. “Ethnic Identification, Intermarriage and Unmeasured Progress by Mexican Americans.” In Mexican Immigration to the United States, ed. George Borjas, 229–268. Chicago: National Bureau of Economic Research and the University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Newport, Elissa. 2002. “Critical Periods in Language Development.” In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, ed. L. Nadel, 737. London: Macmillan Publishers, Nature Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mevlude Akbulut-Yuksel
    • 1
  • Hoyt Bleakley
    • 2
  • Aimee Chin
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Dalhousie universityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  3. 3.University of HoustonHoustonUSA
  4. 4.National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)CambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations