Nuclear Power Contracts and International Cooperation: Analyzing Innovation and Social Distribution in Russian Foreign Policy



What is the role of nuclear contracts in Russian foreign policy? This chapter analyzes the political economy of nuclear power regulation in Russia and its implications for Russian foreign policy when it comes to international cooperation in the advanced and the developing world. Complementarities between the civil and military uses of nuclear power may explain its extensive adoption by states defined by high electricity demand, market interventionism, and great power status. Now that nuclear technology focuses primarily on civil rather than military applications, sustainable development fueled by sufficient growth rates is part of the core logic of nuclear investment. In that regard, is it possible to argue that international business activity in the nuclear sector may have positive domestic implications for social welfare? The latter includes all those policy instruments that guarantee the provision of a distributive minimum to the median citizen of the middle- and lower-class continuum price subsidies on energy commodities, social peace-preserving employment rates, and the provision of adequate health and education services form a set of energy-induced distributive rents for middle- and low-income citizens (Roemer 1993; World Energy Outlook 2006). Low electricity prices have been more important than nuclear weapons for governmental survival since the end of the Cold War; nuclear innovation reduces the marginal cost of electricity production and thus allows higher consumption rates for the median citizen. This first-order assumption implies that nuclear innovation is expected to exert positive welfare influence at the domestic level; international nuclear power contracts are less likely to occur when, despite their high sunk costs, they are not linked with social peace and public opinion.


Nuclear Technology Russian Government Nuclear Waste Disposal Social Distribution Innovation Incentive 


  1. Aukutsionek, Sergey, and Valeri Mironov. 2007. Rasshirenie ES i Rossiiskaia Ekonomika. Mirovaia Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniia 5(May): 58–64.Google Scholar
  2. Avdasheva, Svetlana, and Yuri Simachev. 2009. Gosudarstvennye Korporatsii: Mozhno li otsenit’ korporativnoe upravlenie? Voprosy Ekonomiki 6(June): 97–110.Google Scholar
  3. CEA. 2006. Memento Sur l`Energie – Energy Handbook.Google Scholar
  4. CEA. 2008a. Produire de l’Énergie sans Gaz d’ Effet de Serre: L’action du CEA. CEA Dossier de Presse, 28 Octobre.Google Scholar
  5. CEA. 2008b. Memento Sur l’Energie – Energy Handbook.Google Scholar
  6. CEA/Cadarache. 2005. ITER a Cadarache.Google Scholar
  7. Cowan, Robin. 1990. Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-in. The Journal of Economic History 50(3): 541–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deliagin, Mikhail. 2008. Goskorporatsii: Modernizatsiia ili Korruptsiia. Nash Sovremennik, 11 November: 201–204.Google Scholar
  9. Dorian, James P., Herman T. Franssen and Dale R. Simbeck. 2006. Global Challenges in Energy. Energy Policy 34: 1984–1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drezner, Daniel W. 2007. All Politics is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dubinin, Yurii. 2004. Rasprostranenie bez granits: Yadernii Dreyf Ukrainy. Rossiia v Global’noi Politike, April (2): 149–164.Google Scholar
  12. Faizullaev, D. A. 2009. Tsentralnoaziatskii Atomnii “Renessans”. Aziia i Afrika segodnia (8), August: 25–31.Google Scholar
  13. Fedorovich V. O. 2008. Restrukturizatsia Gossektora: formirovanie iadernogo energopromyshlennogo kholdinga. E’KO Vserossiiskii Ekonomicheskii Zhurnal 7(July): 16–29.Google Scholar
  14. Fiore, Karin. 2006. Nuclear Energy and Sustainability: Understanding ITER. Energy Policy 34: 3334–3341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Generation IV International Forum. 2008. Introduction to Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems and the International Forum. Available from < ash/intro/index.html>. Accessed 1 March 2011.
  16. IAEA. 2007. Milestones in the Development of a National Infrastructure for Nuclear Power. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series, NG-G-3.1. Google Scholar
  17. Ivashentsov, Gleb. 2010. Aziatskii Vektor Rossiiskoi Energetiki. Mezhdunarodnaia Zhizn 2(March): 67–72.Google Scholar
  18. Kamalova, F. R. 2006. VTB kak gosudarstvennyi bank budet uchastvovat’ v proektakh Rosatoma. Atomnaia Strategia (25): Kontseptsiia Razvitiia, Sentiabr’. Google Scholar
  19. Kraft, Michael E. 2000. Policy Design and the Acceptability of Environmental Risks: Nuclear Waste Disposal in Canada and the United States. Policy Studies Journal 28(1): 206–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kryukov, Oleg V. 2006. Nam Doveriyaiut Atomshchiki 14 Stran Mira. Atomnaia Strategia (25): Glavnaia Tema, Sentiabr’. Google Scholar
  21. Kungurov, Yu. A. 2008. Organizatsionnye i Finansovye Aspekty Reformirovaniia Atomnogo Energopromyshlennogo Kompleksa Rossii. Aval Mart-Aprel 2’. Google Scholar
  22. Martinez-Val, Jose and Mireia Piera. 2007. Nuclear Fission Sustainability with Hybrid Nuclear Cycles. Energy Conversion and Management 48: 1480–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. OECD/IEA. 2000. Nuclear Power in Competitive Electricity Markets. OECD/IEA Report. Google Scholar
  24. OECD/IEA. 2007. Nuclear Power. IEA Energy Technology Essentials, March.Google Scholar
  25. OECD/Nuclear Energy Agency. 2000. Nuclear Energy in a Sustainable Development Perspective. OECD/IEA Report. Google Scholar
  26. OECD/Nuclear Energy Agency. 2002. Nuclear Energy and the Kyoto Protocol. OECD/IEA Report. Google Scholar
  27. Rineiskii, Anatolii A. 2006. Inzhiniring Energobloka s Reaktorom Na Bystrykh NeitronakhGoogle Scholar
  28. BN-800: Sravnenie s Mirovymi Analogami. Atomnaia Strategia (23): Atomnye Tekhnologii. Google Scholar
  29. Roemer, John. 1993. A Pragmatic Theory of Responsibility for the Egalitarian Planner. Philosophy and Public Affairs 22(2): 146–166.Google Scholar
  30. Roland, Gérard. 2000. Transition and Economics: Politics, Markets and Firms. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Roland, Gérard. 2002. The Political Economy of Transition. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(1): 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosatom. 2008a. Atomnaia Energetika v Rossii.Google Scholar
  33. Rosatom. 2008b. Dokumenty Goskorporatsii Rosatom.Google Scholar
  34. Rosatom. 2008c. Geografi ia Atomnykh Obektov.Google Scholar
  35. Rossiiskaia Federatsiia. 1995. Federalnii Zakon ob Ispolzovanii Atomnoi Energetiki.20 October.Google Scholar
  36. Rossiiskaia Federatsiia. 2007. Federalnii Zakon o Gosudarstvennoi Korporatsii po atomnoi energetike Rosatom. 1 December.Google Scholar
  37. Rothman, Stanley and Robert Lichter. 1987. Elite Ideology and Risk Perception in Nuclear Energy Policy. American Political Science Review 81(2): 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schneider, Mycle. 2000. Changement Climatique et Énergie Nucléaire. WWF, Aout.Google Scholar
  39. Semenov S. et al. 2008. Lokomotiv Rossiiskoi Ekonomiki. Voprosy Ekonomiki (11), November: 102–109.Google Scholar
  40. Sokolov, Yury A. et al. 2004. Nuclear Power in the 21 st Century and its Role in Developing Countries. An International Journal of Nuclear Power 18 (2–3): 21–26.Google Scholar
  41. Tsvetkov, V. A. 2006. Gosudarstvo i Ekonomika: Blagie Namerenia i Podvodnie Kamni. E’KO Vserossiiskii Ekonomicheskii Zhurnal 10(October): 92–105.Google Scholar
  42. Yildiz, Bilge and Mujid Kazimi. 2006. Effi ciency of Hydrogen Systems Using Alternative Nuclear Energy Technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31(1): 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. World Energy Outlook. 2006. Are Conditions Right for a Nuclear Revival? Fact Sheet – Nuclear. Available from <>. Accessed 1 March 2011.
  44. World Energy Council. 2007. The Role of Nuclear Power in Europe. Available from <>. Accessed 1 March 2011.
  45. World Nuclear Association. 2008. The Economics of Nuclear Power. Nuclear Issue Papers 5. Yildiz, Bilge and Mujid S. Kazimi. 2006. Effi ciency of Hydrogen Production Systems Using Alternative Nuclear Energy Technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31: 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations