Advertisement

Antibacterial Aqueous Emulsions

  • Jan W. Gooch
Chapter
Part of the Topics in Applied Chemistry book series (TAPP)

Abstract

Researchers at the Center for Biologic Nanotechnology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Michigan published and patented results of project MDA 972-1-007 of the Unconventional Pathogen Countermeasures Program, Defense Advanced Research Project Agency. The introduction of biological agents to our working and living environment has forced an examination of preventative and decontamination methods (Mobley 1995). The project involved antibacterial aqueous nanoemulsions to treat bacteria-infected people and disinfect contaminated surfaces such as vehicles and medical equipment exposed to anthrax spores. Literature and patents were reviewed, materials and equipment were procured, and emulsions were prepared and evaluated for antibacterial activity. The antibacterial emulsion technology could possibly be useful if it is reproducible. Regarding emulsion technology, the term “emulsion” is the industry standard, and “nanoemulsion” pertains to emulsified particle less than a micron in diameter (e.g., typical of paint latex particle size), but greater than a nanometer. Actually, particle diameters for industrial emulsions are usually in the nanometer range.

Keywords

Oleic Acid Antibacterial Activity Caprylic Acid Tributyl Phosphate Defense Advance Research Project Agency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. AccuSizer, Particle Sizing Systems Co., 75 Aero Camino, Santa Barbara, California, 93117.Google Scholar
  2. Acme-Hardesty Company, 1787 Sentry Parkway West, Suite 18-460, Blue Bell, PA 19422.Google Scholar
  3. APV Products – Homogenizer, 439 South Union Street, Bldg. 2, Lawrence Maryland, 01843.Google Scholar
  4. Asculai, S. S., US Patent 4,020,183 (1977).Google Scholar
  5. Baker, J. R., US Patent 6,015,832 (2000).Google Scholar
  6. Black, J. C., Microbilogy, 5th ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2002, pp. 313–335, 346.Google Scholar
  7. Block, S. S., ed., Disinfection , Sterilization and Preservation, Loppincott, Williams & Wilins, New York, 2001, pp. 41, 195.Google Scholar
  8. Block, S. S., ed., Sterilants, Disinfectants and Antiseptics, Disinfection, Preservation and Sterilization, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, New York, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. Fisher Scientific Sonic Dismembrator, Model 500, 2000 Park Avenue, Pittsburg, PA 15275.Google Scholar
  10. Foster, S. J., and Johnstone, K., Pulling the rigger: the mechanism of bacterial spore germination, Mol. Microbiol., 1990, 4, 1, 137–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gooch, J. W., Emulsification and Polymerization of Alkyd Resins, KluwerAcademic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 2002, p. 169.Google Scholar
  12. Gooch, J. W., Auotoxidative Polymerization of Vegetable Oil Based Emulsions, Doctoral Dissertation, Polymer Science and Engineering Department, University of Southern Mississippi, 1980.Google Scholar
  13. Gooch, J. W., Analysis and Deformulation of Polymeric Materials, Plenum, New York, 1997.Google Scholar
  14. Guyton, A. C., Textbook of Medical Physiology, 7th ed. W. B. Sanders, Philadelphia, PA, 1986, pp. 96–97.Google Scholar
  15. Hamouda, T., and Baker, J. R., Antimicrobial mechanism of action of surfactant lipid preparations in enteric Gram-negative bacilli, Jr. App. Micro., 2000, 89, 397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heavy Duty Laboratory Mixer Emulsifier, Model L4RT-A, Silverson Machines Ltd., Waterside Chesham, Bucks., England, HP5 1PQ.Google Scholar
  17. Helenius, A., and Simmons, K., Solubilization of membranes by detergents, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1975, 415, 29–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hilgren, J. D., and Salverda, J. A., Antimicrobial efficacy of a peroxyacetic/octanoic acid mixture, J. Food Sci., 2000, 65, 8, 1376–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howard, R., Topical antimicrobial toxicity, Arch. Surg., March 1985, 120, 3, 267–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leive, L., The barrier function of the gram-negative envelope, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., New York, 1973, 235, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McDonnell, G., and Russell, D., Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance, Clin. Microbiol. Rev., Jan. 1999, 12, 1, 147–179.Google Scholar
  22. Mobley, J. A., Biological warfare in the twentieth century: lessons learned from the past, challenges for the future, Mil. Med., November 1995, 160, 11, 547–553.Google Scholar
  23. Morrison, R. T., and Boyd, R. N., Organic Chemistry, 6th ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1992, pp.713, 732–736.Google Scholar
  24. Neurath, A. R., US Patent 4,450,573 (1985).Google Scholar
  25. Nixdorff, K., Interaction of lipopolysaccharide with detergents and its possible role in the detergent resistance of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1978, 510, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ochiai, M. K., US Patent 4,636,525 (1987).Google Scholar
  27. LS Particle Size Analyzer, Beckman Coulter, 27 March 2002, MC 195-00P.O. Box 169015 Miami, Florida 33116-9015.Google Scholar
  28. Russell, A. D., Bacterial spores and chemical sporicidal agents, Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1990, 3, 2, 99–119.Google Scholar
  29. Rutala, W. A., APIC guideline for selection and use of disinfectant, AJIC Am. J. Infect. Control, August 1996, 24, 4, 313–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rutledge, T. F., US Patent 4,147,663 (1979).Google Scholar
  31. Segel, I. H., Biochemical Calculations, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1976, p. 3.Google Scholar
  32. Silverson Homogenizer, Model L4R, Silverson Machines, LTD, Waterside, Chesham, Bucks., England, HP5 1PQ.Google Scholar
  33. Sipos, T. J., US Patent 4,006,218 (1977).Google Scholar
  34. Sipos, T. J., US Patent 4,197,318 (1980).Google Scholar
  35. Sonic Dismembrator Model 500, Fisher Scientific Co., 200 Park Lane, Pittsburg, PA 15275.Google Scholar
  36. Tagesson, C., and Edling, C., Influence of surface-active food additives on the integrity and permeability of rat intestinal mucosa, Food Chem. Toxicol., 1984, 22, 11, 861–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tween 20, Chemical Classification – Ethoxylated Fatty Acids, Chemical Description – Polyoxyethylene (20) Sorbitan Monolaurate, Hydrophile-Lipophile Balance (HLB) 16.7, Uniqema, 1000 Uniqema Blvd., New Castle, Delaware 19720.Google Scholar
  38. Viscometer, Model DV-E Digital, Brookfield Engineering Laboratories, Inc., 11 Commerce Boulevard, Middleboro, Maryland 02346.Google Scholar
  39. Wright, D. C., US Patent 5,547,677 (1996).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations