Barrier Dressings for Wounds

  • Jan W. Gooch
Part of the Topics in Applied Chemistry book series (TAPP)


The skin is the largest human organ and is the essential interface between the host and its environment. Among the major functions of this organ are mechanisms that provide heat loss or heat retention; water loss or water retention; elimination of waste via exfoliation; protection against penetration of ultraviolet light; touch location of physical objects; and, perhaps most obviously, protection of underlying tissues from microbial pathogens contacted in the environment. Methods to establish an artificial barrier function over damaged skin by use of bandages, compresses, poultices, and other devices have been recorded during all phases of medical history. Today, there are adequate methods and devices for skin closure and/or bandaging at medical institutions capable of providing definitive surgical care, for example, hospital emergency and operating suites. The general availability of such facilities and emergency medical transportation systems are basic infrastructure components of modern societies. The wide variety of sizes, shapes, materials, and mechanical devices necessary to accomplish this level of wound care, however, is dependent upon an extensive logistic and storage base.


Polyvinyl Acetate Water Vapor Transport Miniemulsion Polymerization Water Vapor Transmission Rate Monomer Droplet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Addad, J.P., ed., Physical Properties of Emulsions, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  2. ASTM F 2256 – 03, Standard Test Method for Strength Properties of Tissue Adhesives in T-Peel by Tension Loading, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.Google Scholar
  3. ASTM D 1653 – 03, Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Organic Coating Films, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.Google Scholar
  4. Barrow, G.M., Physical Chemistry, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1973, pp. 741–742.Google Scholar
  5. Barnette, D.T., and Schork, F.J., Chem. Eng. Progress, 83, No. 6, 25–30 (1987).Google Scholar
  6. Black, J.G., Microbiology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2002, pp. 97–99.Google Scholar
  7. Block, S. S. ed., 5th Ed., Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, New York, 2001, pp. 324–327.Google Scholar
  8. Chamberlain, B.J., Napper, D.H., and Gilbert, R. G., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I, 78, 591–601 (1982). “Chemistry of Acrylamide,” American Cyanamide Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christophersen, A.G., Jun, H., Jørgensen, K., and Skibsted, L.H. Photobleaching of astaxanthin and canthaxanthin: quantum-yields dependence of solvent, temperature, and wavelength of irradiation in relation to packageing and storage of carotenoid pigmented salmonoids. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch., 192, 433–439 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choi, Y. T., El-Aasser, M. S., Sudol, E. D., and Vanderhoff, J. W., J. Appl. Polym Sci., 23, 2973–2987 (1985).Google Scholar
  11. Coover, H.W., Dreifus, D.W., and O’Connor, J.T., Handbook of Adhesives, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1990, pp. 463–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fontenot, K., and Schork, F.J., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 49, 633–655 (1993a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fontenot, K., and Schork, F.J., I&EC Res., 32, 373–385 (1993b).Google Scholar
  14. Gerhardt, P, ed., Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C., 2001, p. 155.Google Scholar
  15. Gooch, J.W., Analysis and Deformulation of Polymeric Materials, Plenum Publishing, New York, 1997.Google Scholar
  16. Gooch, J.W., Emulsification and Polymerization of Alkyd Resins, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publising, New York, 2002.Google Scholar
  17. Heard, D.D., and Ashworth, R.W., The collodial properties of chlorhexidine and its interaction with some macromolecules, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 20, 505–512 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kimura, M., Sunami, K.K., and Takeda, A., Anaphylactic shock caused by chlorhexidine gluconate and maltose. Matsui to Sosi, 30:319–322 (1994).Google Scholar
  19. Lionelli, G.T., and Lawrence, W.T., Surg. Clin. North Am., 83, 617–638, (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mathews, C.K., van Holde, K.E., and Ahern, K.G., Biochemistry, An Imprint of Addison, Wesley Longman, Inc., New York, 2000, pp. 26–41.Google Scholar
  21. McCarthy, J.G., ed., Plastic Surgery, Vol. 1, W. B. Sanders Company, Philadelphia, PA, 1990, p. 282.Google Scholar
  22. Jansson, L., Masters Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1983. Testing on Rats.Google Scholar
  23. Maw, J., and Quinn, J. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives. Am. J. Cosmet. Surg., 14, 4 (1997).Google Scholar
  24. Mertz, P.M., Davis, S.C., Cazzangi, A.L., Drosou, A., Eaglstein, W.H., University of Miami School of Medicine and Narang, U., Closure Medical Corporation Raleigh, NC, “Microbial Proliferation and Barrier Protection of 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate Derived Wound Treatment Films,” July 2001 (Research Report).Google Scholar
  25. Morrison, R.T., and Boyd, R.N., Organic Chemistry, 6th Ed., Prentice Hall, New York, 1992.Google Scholar
  26. Mouron, D., Reimers, J., and Schork, F.J., Miniemulsion polymerization of methyl methacrylate with dodecyl mercaptan as cosurfactant. J. Polym. Sci. (Polym. Chem.), 34, 1073–1081 (1996).Google Scholar
  27. Narang, U., Mainwaring, L., Spath, G., and Barefoot, J., J. Cutan. Med. Surg., 7, No. 1, 13–19 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ostwald, W.Z., Phys. Chem., 37, 385–390 (1901).Google Scholar
  29. Ottenbrite, R. M., Huang, S. J., and Park, K., eds., Hydrogels and Biodegradable Polymers for Bioapplications, 208th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Washington, D. C., August 21–26, 1994, pp. 2–10, 17–24.Google Scholar
  30. Pollack, S.V., J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol., 5, No. 6, 477–481 (1979).Google Scholar
  31. Rauck, A., Orbital Interaction Theory of Organic Chemistry, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001.Google Scholar
  32. Reimers, J.L., and Schork, F.J., Miniemulsion copolymerization using water-insoluble comonomers as cosurfactants, Polym. React. Eng., 4, No. 2&3, 135–152 (1996a).Google Scholar
  33. Reimers, J.L., and Schork, F.J., Robust nucleation in polymer-stabilized miniemulsion polymerization, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 59, 1833–1841 (1996b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sepe, Michael P., Dynamic mechanical analysis for plastics engineering, pp. 6–16 (1998)Google Scholar
  35. Sichina, W.J., SPE ANTEC, 34,1139 (1988)Google Scholar
  36. Segel, I.H., Biochemical Calculations, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, M.B., and March, J., March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2001.Google Scholar
  38. Sorokin, A., “Influence of the Intramolecular distribution of vinyl acetate groups in polyvinyl alcohols on their physiochemical and biological properties,” Polymeric Materials Science and Engineering of the American Chemical Society Meeting, Vol. 78, Spring, Dallas TX 1998.Google Scholar
  39. “Surgical Applications of Tissue Sealants and Adhesives 6th, 7 and 8th Annual Conferences (2001–2004),” sponsored by the Cambridge Healthtech Institute, 1037 Chestnut Street, Newton Upper Falls, MA.Google Scholar
  40. Tandara, A.A., and Mustoe, T.A., Oxygen in wound healing – more than a nutrient. World J. Surg., 28, 294–300 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Visscher, M., Hoath, S.B., Conroy, E., and Wickett, R.R., Arch. Dermatol. Res., 293, 491–499 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Winter, J.D., Nature, 193, 293–294 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Woodcock, P.M., Biguanides as industrial biocides, in Payne, K.R., ed., Industrial Biocides, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1988, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations